Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
President Obama has been out of office for over two years, little fella. I suggest you move on.

His minions remain as agents provocateurs in the administration to subvert the policies of the Trump administration, you know this as well, little dude. I suggest you mince your way home.![]()
TSD, HisArpy:General lack of intelligence). You, however, don't have any such excuse. Shameful.We tend to overlook delusions from a number of posters here for a number of different reasons (Conager:Aspberger Brain Chemistry, BotanyBoomerTSD, HisArpy:General lack of intelligence). You, however, don't have any such excuse. Shameful.
This is your daily reminder that the whistleblower's allegations have long since been corroborated, and that the obsessive continuing focus on him is a pathetic effort at deflection from a fanbase that can't accept that they hitched all their hopes and dreams to an incompetent racist criminal.
Have a nice day!
This is your daily reminder that the whistleblower's allegations have long since been corroborated, and that the obsessive continuing focus on him is a pathetic effort at deflection from a fanbase that can't accept that they hitched all their hopes and dreams to an incompetent racist criminal.
Have a nice day!
You should change you handle to HisOstrich .1. What is immoral or corrupt by an "expensive replacement wall"?
2. What is immoral or corrupt about not believing the same intelligence agencies who falsely said there are WMD's in Iraq (which, BTW is only 1 item on the list of their other recent failures of analysis and fact finding)?
Please dont interrupt their character assasination, it's what they do when they know they are losing.

You should change you handle to HisOstrich .
It was Trump and his minions who diverted funds from other projects to fund his wall .
And deflecting to Bush & Cheney who had sexed up various reports to say there were WMD's is going back a president too far .
You voted Democratic. right? That makes you ineligible to register an observation on loserhood.![]()
as opposed to being an expert loser like yourself![]()


Not hardly. I'm a winner in life, and my side is winning this political argument while your side surfs a wave of bullshit that pollutes the shores of reality every morning. You've wiped out so many times trying to hang ten your eyes are brown.![]()
You voted Democratic. right?
"hang ten"? you were old before i was born![]()
Not hardly. I'm a winner in life, and my side is winning this political argument while your side surfs a wave of bullshit that pollutes the shores of reality every morning. You've wiped out so many times trying to hang ten your eyes are brown.![]()
https://media1.giphy.com/media/l0HlCzHGak3padyQ8/giphy.gifIt's a common term in the surfing community where I go to the beach. I might have been in my twenties when you were born if you're thirty or so. But don't worry you couldn't keep up with this American at any age. One has to be in good shape to do what I do and go where I go.![]()
WB #1 "I heard that from my second cousin twice removed who heard it her husbands third cousin."
WB #2 "I heard the same thing from MY neice's boyfriends mother."
There ya go, corroboration.![]()

Did you catch this in Morrison's testimony just released?
Mr. Castor asking Morrison why he chose not to include Vindman in a conversation Morrison had with Ambassador Taylor
Q: Okay. It had nothing to do with your trust in Colonel Vindman?
MR. MORRISON: I had concerns about Lieutenant Colonel Vindman's judgment .
BY MR. CASTOR: Judgment with respect to what?
A Among the discussions I had with Dr. Hill in the transition was our team, my team, its strengths and its weaknesses. And Fiona and others had raised concerns about Alex's judgment.
Q Okay. Did you ever have any concerns that he might leak something?
A No.
Q: Did anyone ever bring concerns to you that they believed Colonel Vindman may have leaked something?
A Yes.
How's that for a bread crumb.![]()
Did you catch this in Morrison's testimony just released?
Mr. Castor asking Morrison why he chose not to include Vindman in a conversation Morrison had with Ambassador Taylor
Q: Okay. It had nothing to do with your trust in Colonel Vindman?
MR. MORRISON: I had concerns about Lieutenant Colonel Vindman's judgment .
BY MR. CASTOR: Judgment with respect to what?
A Among the discussions I had with Dr. Hill in the transition was our team, my team, its strengths and its weaknesses. And Fiona and others had raised concerns about Alex's judgment.
Q Okay. Did you ever have any concerns that he might leak something?
A No.
Q: Did anyone ever bring concerns to you that they believed Colonel Vindman may have leaked something?
A Yes.
How's that for a bread crumb.![]()
Let's step back from the details and look at the implications. So Morrison had a team that was divided against itself. Vindman's judgement was called into question by Morrison (and at least one other). But there is no reason to believe that Morrison's judgement was/is any better than Vindman's. Without placing a value on the quality of anyone's judgement it's obvious that they were fractured over WHOSE foreign policy was going to be applied. What they seem to have forgotten is the fact that they neither make nor control foreign policy. They were engaged in an internal power struggle over something that was NOT contained in their job description. About the only thing they seem to be in agreement on is they all disagreed with the presidents policy, and that IS in his job description. That description also gives the president the power, actually the requirement, to request investigations of US citizens where there is an indication of corruption, political adversary or not.