dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 3,332
And you grin without so much as a gnat's ass worth of knowledge to contribute to the discussion... as usual.The usual suspects, all tilting at windmills.
Lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And you grin without so much as a gnat's ass worth of knowledge to contribute to the discussion... as usual.The usual suspects, all tilting at windmills.
Lol
Windmills can't be all bad. The governor of Texas is putting them up to augment his failed electrical grid independence platform. Seems Texans don't like freezing to death because there wasn't enough electricity to keep homes warm except for the guy, Cancun Cruz, who flew his family south of the border for a warm vacation while his constituents froze their asses off.One is tempted to suspect RG of opposing wind power just because Trump does -- no other reason.
And Trump does because 1) he's in the pocket of Big Oil and 2) doesn't like windmills near his golf courses -- no other reason.
In fairness to Cruz, he's a Senator, not the Governor. There was nothing he could do to help by staying home.Windmills can't be all bad. The governor of Texas is putting them up to augment his failed electrical grid independence platform. Seems Texans don't like freezing to death because there wasn't enough electricity to keep homes warm except for the guy, Cancun Cruz, who flew his family south of the border for a warm vacation while his constituents froze their asses off.
Could you tell that to those who voted for him? When he realized the impact of his actions, he jumped right back on the plane and returned to help pass out relief items. It's called concern for your constituents.In fairness to Cruz, he's a Senator, not the Governor. There was nothing he could do to help by staying home.
Why?Fossil fuels and nuclear are better options.
The current huge windmills are placed mostly in areas where there is nothing else to see for many miles. There is still plenty of skyline around them, much more than we can see in any city. On my long drives there, I was glad to see anything at all besides road and flat empty land.
They will eventually be demolished as costing more energy than they produce, but the smaller windmills that many farmers built for direct personal use before the national electric grid will probably return.
In the eastern woodlands, windmills have been placed on cropland that was previously forest. Letting some forests regrow will be necessary to fuel our woodburning stoves without fossil fuels.
Those are too densely located. Crowding them together would be more convenient in land cost, but one tower blocking the next mill's wind is another energy cost, in addition to the energy lost as heat on many miles of low conductance steel wires from remote locations to cities.They're ugly and a blight.
Why?Fossil fuels and nuclear are better options.
I tried to get the actual court decision but so far no luck. It may explain the court's thinking and the opposing arguments in detail. Even the U.S. Attorney didn't fully explain the issue. Here is a bit more detail;
https://osagenews.org/historic-win-judge-orders-enel-to-remove-turbines-by-december-2025/
Here is a discussion that might help to flesh this case out: https://weatherguardwind.com/enel-vs-the-osage-nation-an-explanation-w-doug-sandridge/?
You're welcome.
Why?Fossil fuels and nuclear are better options.