They've got it bad, so bad for Hillary

But Walker bought a sweater for $1......where is teh OUTRAGE????????????????????????????????


Scarborough: IG report on emails “just the tip of the iceberg” for Hillary


Ever since the New York Times’ Thursday-night exposé of the Inspectors General referrals to the Department of Justice and FBI, the Hillary Clinton campaign and its allies have been trying to attack the media that reports on it. A follow-up from the Wall Street Journal that specifies that the IGs found four e-mails out of a sample of 40 contained then-classified intelligence material has been largely ignored by these entities as they focus on the NYT’s original reporting. In a long, measured takedown earlier today on Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough steps through a comprehensive overview of the entire scandal, Hillary Clinton’s dodging, and the stakes involved.

Be sure to watch this in full, because there have been few presentations in the media as comprehensive as this on the e-mail scandal, and none at all on MSNBC, I’d bet:



Interestingly, Bloomberg’s Mark Halperin gets to the heart of the matter at the very end:

It matters in terms of security. If there was classified information in there — Secretary [Clinton] says there wasn’t, the Inspectors General say there was — and that got hacked into in the private server, that is a huge breach of her responsibilities. That to me is where the story’s going. Will the FBI investigate the question of was there a security breach on the private server, or on the outside server, the outside vendor that — the Clintons switched their information — making sure that there was no security breach. And they’ve not addressed that one bit.
Former Obama auto czar Steve Rattner advises Hillary to get this issue “off the table,” to which Mika Brzezinski expresses total amazement. She needs to cough up the server as a first step, Rattner advises, and then thinks she can get back to status quo ante (via Michael Warren):

“I think Hillary Clinton needs to get this issue off the table as best she can by being as open and as disclosive as possible about what happened,” Rattner said.

“How can she do that?” asked co-host Mika Brzezinski.

“Personally, I think she should basically say, ‘Yeah, at this point, I have no secrets, you can look at the server, you can see what’s there, I’ll help you the best I can,'” Rattner replied.

Warren also notes at The Weekly Standard that Rattner and his wife are bundlers for Team Hillary, having raised more than $100,000. Why, exactly, is Rattner participating in this conversation at all without disclosure of his political connections to the subject of the story? But if the “Hillblazers” are now asking Hillary to release the server and its backups, the story is beginning to hit critical mass.
 
You're trying to hold Hillary to a different standard than Powell. Just admit it....it'll be okay.

The only people who care about missing e-mail letters and Benghazi are cranks who would never vote for Hillary anyway.
 
If you don't see the potential danger to the security of the country not to mention the ability to cover up illegal transaction and or influence peddling then you are either a partisan hack or a moron. Which is it?

How'd that Iraq war turn out? Did you see through the lies? You going to the mat to defend your bro Bush II? If you do you're either a partisan hack or a moron. Which is it?
 
btw, CuntClinton voted for WAR, if you say she was lied to, then she isnt very smart, if Bush lied to her, world leaders will as well, we cant risk the CUNT as Potus
 
How'd that Iraq war turn out? Did you see through the lies? You going to the mat to defend your bro Bush II? If you do you're either a partisan hack or a moron. Which is it?

I will agree that the war in Iraq could now be considered a cluster F but due largely to Obama pulling out prematurely. Without getting off the subject of the thread would you like to be more specific when referring to lies, "BushII" and how these things have anything to do with Hillary and the subject at hand?

Do you plan to justify illegal behavior by a Sec of Defense who is now running (essentially unopposed) for the highest office in the land to what you want to claim a past President did?
 
The war in Iraq was a clusterfuck and has nothing to do with anything Obama did. Not largely, not in part. It was 100% Bush's fault. As for Hillary it's just how life goes. She didn't do anything wrong in the grand scheme of things and people are trying to use it to slander her.
 
The war in Iraq was a clusterfuck and has nothing to do with anything Obama did. Not largely, not in part. It was 100% Bush's fault. As for Hillary it's just how life goes. She didn't do anything wrong in the grand scheme of things and people are trying to use it to slander her.


Nonsense, as we have heard from testimony from military officials that know a bit more about the war then you or me.

OK, its been asked before I know but I have to ask again. If she didn't do anything wrong why didn't she turn over her mail server in full disclosure? Why did her mail server disappear?

If its just slander as you say... so far its seems to be fairly effective. Slander in politics doesn't typically does't have much in the way of legs. That does not seem to be the case here.
 
It is nonsense, worse than nonsense. We should have never been there in the first place. People are up the Bush camp lies, and the cluster f#%k commenced.

Who's saying her server disappeared?

Legs you say? Tell me one "scandal" you've let
Go of yet? :rolleyes:
 
It is nonsense, worse than nonsense. We should have never been there in the first place. People are up the Bush camp lies, and the cluster f#%k commenced.

Who's saying her server disappeared?

Legs you say? Tell me one "scandal" you've let
Go of yet? :rolleyes:



If it didn't disappear why doesn't she give it up and prove her innocence once and for all?
 
Why don't you just stop making crap up out of the blue. That, would be a good start.
 
It is nonsense, worse than nonsense. We should have never been there in the first place. People are up the Bush camp lies, and the cluster f#%k commenced.

Who's saying her server disappeared?

Legs you say? Tell me one "scandal" you've let
Go of yet? :rolleyes:

CuntClinton said it was destroyed:cool:
 
Nonsense, as we have heard from testimony from military officials that know a bit more about the war then you or me.

OK, its been asked before I know but I have to ask again. If she didn't do anything wrong why didn't she turn over her mail server in full disclosure? Why did her mail server disappear?

If its just slander as you say... so far its seems to be fairly effective. Slander in politics doesn't typically does't have much in the way of legs. That does not seem to be the case here.

It is nonsense, worse than nonsense. We should have never been there in the first place. People are up the Bush camp lies, and the cluster f#%k commenced.

Who's saying her server disappeared?

Legs you say? Tell me one "scandal" you've let
Go of yet? :rolleyes:

If it didn't disappear why doesn't she give it up and prove her innocence once and for all?

CuntClinton said it was destroyed :cool:

it doesnt exist
depends what you mean by DESTROYED:mad:

The fishy cat said it "disappeared". You did it was "destroyed" in support of his statement.

Don't let the pedal hit your shin, as you backpedal so furiously.
 
Why don't you just stop making crap up out of the blue. That, would be a good start.

OK, then answer the question those on the right and left want to know, if the server was not lost, stolen or destroyed and still in her possession, then why doesn't she turn it over to the proper authorities and clear her name so she can move on (.org) with her campaign?
 
OK, then answer the question those on the right and left want to know, if the server was not lost, stolen or destroyed and still in her possession, then why doesn't she turn it over to the proper authorities and clear her name so she can move on (.org) with her campaign?

we KNOW why
 
OK, then answer the question those on the right and left want to know, if the server was not lost, stolen or destroyed and still in her possession, then why doesn't she turn it over to the proper authorities and clear her name so she can move on (.org) with her campaign?

Well, you'd have to ask her that now wouldn't you.
 
Back
Top