Because the RR are dominionists. Their agenda is flatly incompatible with the Libertarians'.Why not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the RR are dominionists. Their agenda is flatly incompatible with the Libertarians'.Why not?
Because the RR are dominionists. Their agenda is flatly incompatible with the Libertarians'.
THat's 100% pure racist MAGA hate speech right there!!! WHYTE SUPREMACIST!!!!! Absolute fuckin' NAZI SCUM!!!!
Shit they'll probably accuse you of rape too if you aren't careful saying far right wing stuff like that. Even just pointing that misinformation out makes you a fascist.....
See!!! The lefties ^^^ fucking hate the USA.
Dominionism is no fantasy. And there is nothing lame about RationalWiki.No they aren't, that's an MSNBC/Salon fantasy. Knock off wiki is still lame.
Dominionism is no fantasy. And there is nothing lame about RationalWiki.
We do need to bear always in mind that the word "conservative" is as demonizable as "liberal." To poison the conservative brand, we need to out-demonize them. Start by pretending there is no difference that matters between "conservative" and "fascist" -- a pretense which in fact grows nearer to the truth every year. Unlike the difference between "liberal" and "communist."
RationalWiki is nothing like that. Their page on Communism is . . . not respectful.Yea, it's commiewiki, when someone needs a lefty bias they go for a commie wiki.
Christian Nationalism matters more in the GOP than Libertarianism does.MIght as well be, it's got no prevalence whatsoever in the GOP.
RationalWiki is nothing like that. Their page on Communism is . . . not respectful.
Christian Nationalism matters more in the GOP than Libertarianism does.
We do need to bear always in mind that the word "conservative" is as demonizable as "liberal." To poison the conservative brand, we need to out-demonize them.
Yep.... That's why conservatives just lost so badly.... Wait! Got that flipped. Sorry.They do a Hell of job by themselves.
di nadaThis is by far my favorite response ever..... You just forgot these...
I fear it will not be long before similar opportunity arises.The way to demonize conservatism is to associate it with what most Americans dislike. During the 1930's conservatism was blamed for the Great Depression.
Who is "we?" You are not a we. You are a you.We do need to bear always in mind that the word "conservative" is as demonizable as "liberal." To poison the conservative brand, we need to out-demonize them. Start by pretending there is no difference that matters between "conservative" and "fascist" -- a pretense which in fact grows nearer to the truth every year. Unlike the difference between "liberal" and "communist."
If Trump messes up the economy, and I expect him to, conservatives who supported him will have some explaining to do.I fear it will not be long before similar opportunity arises.
It is and even they know to be ashamed of it when confronted directly.
![]()
![]()
![]()
That's 1950's Red Scare talk.
There were not then really any secret, underground crypto-Commies, and there are not any now.
You are a liar.So? It's accurate and still holds true today. Demonstrably so at large and on lit.
Of course there are, they call themselves "progressives" and "liberals". Both lies.
Not at all.You are a liar.
As usual.
A simple search for billionaire plutocrats supporting the Democrat Party:What makes no sense is calling the plutocrats leftist. The Kochs and Scaifes and Coorses ain't leftist.
*sigh* Once again:
There is a real American left, and its existence matters, and it is to the left of the Democrats, and its influence in that party is negligible. Not even an innocuous, vanilla, more-or-leftist social democrat like Bernie Sanders can get the Dem nomination.
If he had it, he could've beaten Trump. Many voters in 2016 were wavering between Trump and Sanders, seeing both as anti-establishment. But even harmless old Sanders was too anti-establishment for the Democrats.
It's like I keep saying: The Dems are almost as wholly owned by the plutocracy as the Pubs.A simple search for billionaire plutocrats supporting the Democrat Party:
Several billionaires have supported the Democratic Party or its candidates over the years, either through political donations, public endorsements, or other forms of support. Here's a list of some notable billionaires who have been known for backing the Democratic Party:
Just a helpful note. When you do so in the public square you might try something other than that sibilant voice laced with a lisp and with less hysteria as well. Your going to have to face American men and you'll need to get your point across before the first hint of a guffaw brings the house down before you're done. Just sayin.And all of these things need to be demonized more fiercely and bitterly and loudly than ever Communism was in any Red-Scare period.

Trump has the backing of labor. You clowns are all done for a decade or so.It's like I keep saying: The Dems are almost as wholly owned by the plutocracy as the Pubs.
The Dems do pay lip-service to labor. That's something.