spacekowboy
Edgar Allan Bro
- Joined
- May 17, 2001
- Posts
- 48,944
I do love me some Queen and I own the Live Aid concert on dvd, but Queen was very reliant upon the studio sound. That sound could never be recreated live. Not by a 4 piece band anyway.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do love me some Queen and I own the Live Aid concert on dvd, but Queen was very reliant upon the studio sound. That sound could never be recreated live. Not by a 4 piece band anyway.
I do love me some Queen and I own the Live Aid concert on dvd, but Queen was very reliant upon the studio sound. That sound could never be recreated live. Not by a 4 piece band anyway.
There was the whole phenomenon in the '70s of acts that really broke through due to a successful live album (Seger, Cheap Trick, Frampton).
Little Feat would possibly be in that category too, if Lowell George hadn't died so soon afterwards (and if he hadn't been such a pain in the ass even on the rare occasions he was sober). Unfortunately, I rarely run into anyone, especially anyone younger than me, who knows the first thing about them.
I do love me some Queen and I own the Live Aid concert on dvd, but Queen was very reliant upon the studio sound. That sound could never be recreated live. Not by a 4 piece band anyway.
Same with their layered vocals.
how many hammonds and rhythm guitar players did zep use live
Enhanced by the studio sound, maybe...reliant, no. Freddie Mercury had a larger-than-life stage presence and Brian May is just fucking amazing. I was too young to see them live wen Freddie was alive and John Deacon was still with them, but I’ve seen Queen + Paul Rodgers and Queen + Adam Lambert live, and Brian and Roger can still rock out!
This is exactly my point with Queen.
They CAN get that sound now with all the digital tricks you can implement live these days. Back in the day you could not. I'm not taking anything away from their creativity or their ability. The facts are that Queen made that sound in the studio. That sound could not be recreated live without the aid of a full orchestra and backing vocalists and no one is going on tour with a circus like that. Not even Freddy Mercury.
There was the whole phenomenon in the '70s of acts that really broke through due to a successful live album (Seger, Cheap Trick, Frampton).
Little Feat would possibly be in that category too, if Lowell George hadn't died so soon afterwards (and if he hadn't been such a pain in the ass even on the rare occasions he was sober). Unfortunately, I rarely run into anyone, especially anyone younger than me, who knows the first thing about them.
I saw Queen at the Forum in LA way back in a magical time called the 70's during the Day At The Races/Night Of The Opera Tour. I'll probably get eatin alive for saying this but I thought their live sound was better than their studio sound in a lot of ways. A lot of the Album stuff sounded flat and muted to me. Live these guys put the pedal down and rocked...and Freddie...well he just stole the show. That man commanded the stage. I just saw Adam Lambert and Queen in Vegas at the Park MGM (great venue) and they still bring it. If you like Queen there's a tribute band that kicks around in LA called Queen Nation and they are very, very good.
I far prefered Queen live to their studio albums, as I thought the albums overproduced, especially the later ones. Freddie was a superb front man and the other guys were great musicians, all fused into a great unit. With Paul Rodgers they were still great, though could never be the same they managed to put a different slant on some classic songs. I'm afraid that the tribute band with Lambert is not Queen, I've only seen them on TV as I wouldn't pay to see that.
I might argue that Queen’s set at Live Aid deserves one of those slots, but technically, it’s not a live album in itself, as the entire concert was probably about 16 hours long. Still among the best live performances ever recorded, and even better on video than audio formats alone.
There’s no arguing with Johnny Cash at Folsom.