Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
probaby correctThat’s not trauma bonding that’s Stockholm syndrome.
Strong nonconsent. I don't hang out in that category, so not sure how it would play with the audience.Woman who lost her virginity to an assault has to leave her therapist husband and kids to return home for funeral, ends up stalked by her assaulter who seduces, brainwashes and makes her his live in slut
Thoughts?
Happily Ever AfterHEA?
I sat for a half hour scribbling ideas for what I would do if someone asked me to write this story. Based on that exercise, here is my advice to you:Woman who lost her virginity to an assault has to leave her therapist husband and kids to return home for funeral, ends up stalked by her assaulter who seduces, brainwashes and makes her his live in slut
Thoughts?
I agree it would be boring and reductive to make her a ready made damsel, perhaps she sees herself as the predator when she heads home, sort of Lisbeth Salander type, the woman who hurts men who hurt women type and decides to “go after” her attacker but under estimates him, she feels armed by every weapon of coping her therapist husband has given her but ultimately fail her. I’d put in a bit about her wanting to but being afraid to heal from her trauma through safely roleplaying it with her husband but worried about being judged for it and ultimately this curiosity is used against her by her stalker. She expects to lead the man who upended her life into the trap but the trap was already set by him.I sat for a half hour scribbling ideas for what I would do if someone asked me to write this story. Based on that exercise, here is my advice to you:
There’s a potentially powerful psychological story buried in your premise, but in its current form it reads like coercive-fetish shorthand. The biggest danger is that the “brainwashed into becoming his slut” collapses the protagonist into a sex object instead of a character.
The premise becomes much more interesting if the story is framed around trauma reactivation and identity destabilization rather than erotic inevitability because of a kidnapping and coercion. That is why someone else commented that this is Stockholm syndrome.
It seems that you are reducing sexual assault to a backstory simply to be the fuel for later erotica. There should be a strong believable foundation that you let the erotic flow from.
A stronger version would treat the assaulter less like a dominant figure and more like a manipulative predator who understands her unresolved trauma better than she does. Instead of kidnapping her, he goes after her mind to make her a willing participant in her enslavement.
The therapist husband angle is excellent because it creates irony and emotional tension because she married safety after the trauma, she has structure, he offers analysis, language for healing,
yet she remains psychologically vulnerable in ways neither she nor her husband fully understands.
Returning home for the funeral is also strong because funerals naturally destabilize identity: old rooms, old smells, old power structures, old shame, old versions of self.
That old home environment can plausibly crack open dissociation, compulsive behavior, unresolved trauma bonding, self-destructive sexuality, or obsessive reenactment patterns without the story needing a literal “brainwashing” or a kidnapping.
If you want this to feel psychologically serious rather than exploitative, I’d suggest that you make the woman intelligent and self-aware, let her recognize the danger repeatedly, show how isolation and emotional regression weaken her boundaries, and make the assaulter frighteningly perceptive rather than hypnotically irresistible.
The best version is probably a domestic/psychological style: she knows she should leave, she even tries to leave, but the encounter awakens unresolved conflicts about shame, desire, punishment, identity, and control.
That creates tragic tension.
One thing I would strongly recommend avoiding: “She secretly wanted it all along.” Instead; she hates what he represents, fears what he awakens, and slowly loses confidence in her ability to distinguish desire from trauma reenactment.
That’s dark, adult, and psychologically believable.
The phrase “live-in slut” hurts the pitch because it flattens the story into exploitation fantasy before the emotional architecture has even been established. If you want broader buy-in, you may want to describe the transformation more psychologically: isolated, dependent, sexually compulsive, trauma-bonded, emotionally captured (not kidnapped), unable to return to her former life.
Good Luck.