eric_erosfan
Rationalist
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2023
- Posts
- 4,625
I feel like even his family must hide their faces in embarrassment when he posts things like this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I feel like even his family must hide their faces in embarrassment when he posts things like this.
your premise is flawed because you assume the trump crime family has any shame at allI feel like even his family must hide their faces in embarrassment when he posts things like this.
Trump's cronies in the government removing the signs doesn't mean it isn't happening. Just look to europe. Formally profitable ski resorts have no snow this year, and all of these people are here near my hometown skiing in the five mountains that surround the valley here.https://www.outkick.com/analysis/tw...ey-environmental-predictions-prove-inaccurate
Glacier National Park removes signs predicting end of glaciers in 2020 after Gore's prediction
(Excerpt: Go to the link for the full story)
I'd like prime minister Carney's speech at Davos. That's how adults with upbringing and intelligence talk
Climate change will take at least centuries, maybe a full millennium, before it settles down into new climates.
ut the situation is becoming urgent for many island nations with just inches above sea level. They need friends in high places, any nation on high ground with spare habitable land.
Ignorant MAGAts always display their anti American rhetoric.When are you moving to Canada?
At least they can expect to get warmer.When are you moving to Canada?
I don't know any yet that are completely under, but they're all losing land now: Bahamas, Maldives, etc. The slow process gives warning to do something now while they have options. Sea level rise is uneven, with millimeters per year on some coasts and centimeters on other coasts. The icecaps melting completely will probably take centuries, with up to 60 meters of sea level rise, and then many nations will be gone, including Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, etc. Many new seas and bays will form, in the Mississippi River Valley, California's Central Valley, southern Australia, the Amazon Basin, etc. A river may connect the Black Sea with the Caspian. Overall, the world will probably gain habitable land with heat distribution becoming more even pole to pole, minus the regions that stay polluted or irradiated for thousands of years.Please list the island nations that have gone underwater.
It won't be like "Waterworld" because it never was that before. But there have been periods where there was no ice at the poles -- and they all predate the emergence of Homo sapiens -- we're not adapted to that world.I don't know any yet that are completely under, but they're all losing land now: Bahamas, Maldives, etc. The slow process gives warning to do something now while they have options. Sea level rise is uneven, with millimeters per year on some coasts and centimeters on other coasts. The icecaps melting completely will probably take centuries, with up to 60 meters of sea level rise, and then many nations will be gone, including Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, etc. Many new seas and bays will form, in the Mississippi River Valley, California's Central Valley, southern Australia, the Amazon Basin, etc. A river may connect the Black Sea with the Caspian. Overall, the world will probably gain habitable land with heat distribution becoming more even pole to pole, minus the regions that stay polluted or irradiated for thousands of years.
The article does not question the sea level is rising, "an inch each decade."
Oh yes it did. I grew up in Northern California and the state went all out on how we can prepare for the pending cold. People built bunkers and were trying to grow crops underground, new types of insulation were frantically being developed. It was madness for the better part of a decade.No you don't because that never happened.
They were right, we are in an ice age.I remember back in the 70's (?) the science nerds were forecasting an ice age. Freezing to death tho is supposed to be the way to go.![]()
As with most things, carbons in the air is a math question. Where are the carbons coming from and how are they getting in the air. Great Britain is .2% of all the pollution in the world. Even if Great Britain could possibly manage to not emit any pollution it would do nothing in “saving the world”.MAGA sheep support more air pollution because Crooked Donnie told them to.
Climate always changes. At no point in the historical record is there any evidence of a stable climate.
Please list the island nations that have gone underwater.
We have hundreds of years of photographs of the coastlines. Seems we could research with those.Excellent point. When in history has the climate ever changed this fast?
Please forgive me, @Mature_fun_wife, but "carbons in the air" will trigger some reflexive laughter from the old timers here. It brings to mind the single most inane post in the history of Literotica, and I am not joking.As with most things, carbons in the air is a math question. Where are the carbons coming from and how are they getting in the air. Great Britain is .2% of all the pollution in the world. Even if Great Britain could possibly manage to not emit any pollution it would do nothing in “saving the world”.
As with most things, carbons in the air is a math question. Where are the carbons coming from and how are they getting in the air. Great Britain is .2% of all the pollution in the world. Even if Great Britain could possibly manage to not emit any pollution it would do nothing in “saving the world”.
Correct, how many here can grasp that concept though? I was merely focusing on the “pollution” factor and how ludicrous it is.Please forgive me, @Mature_fun_wife, but "carbons in the air" will trigger some reflexive laughter from the old timers here. It brings to mind the single most inane post in the history of Literotica, and I am not joking.
Right wing mouthbreather Ishmael (banned here but eventually respawned as "Rebel5Soul") once made the following "scientific" assertion:
"Oil is a renewable resource and there is PEER-REVIEWED science to back this up: Oil is burned by consumers, releasing hydrocarbons into the atmosphere. Hydrocarbons mix with water vapor in clouds, returning to Earth as rain. Since hydrocarbons weigh significantly more than water, they are absorbed into the ground faster, sinking beneath the water table. There they pool into reservoirs and coalesce into petroleum, and the cycle begins anew".
THISis the "peer-reviewed science" you are up against here.
"♫♫ It's the circle, the cirrrrrrcle of liiiiifffffffffffffe ♫♫"