Twenty Years Later, 'An Inconvenient Truth' Has Been Thoroughly Debunked

Climate change will take at least centuries, maybe a full millennium, before it settles down into new climates. But the situation is becoming urgent for many island nations with just inches above sea level. They need friends in high places, any nation on high ground with spare habitable land.
 
https://www.outkick.com/analysis/tw...ey-environmental-predictions-prove-inaccurate

Glacier National Park removes signs predicting end of glaciers in 2020 after Gore's prediction

(Excerpt: Go to the link for the full story)
Trump's cronies in the government removing the signs doesn't mean it isn't happening. Just look to europe. Formally profitable ski resorts have no snow this year, and all of these people are here near my hometown skiing in the five mountains that surround the valley here.

The sooner that senile grifter falls down a staircase the better. But obviously the damage is done and the United States will never recover from him. And nobody will trust them again

I'd like prime minister Carney's speech at Davos. That's how adults with upbringing and intelligence talk
 
Climate change will take at least centuries, maybe a full millennium, before it settles down into new climates.

Climate always changes. At no point in the historical record is there any evidence of a stable climate.

ut the situation is becoming urgent for many island nations with just inches above sea level. They need friends in high places, any nation on high ground with spare habitable land.

Please list the island nations that have gone underwater.
 
Environmental Insurrectionists? Okay that's definitely a new insult. I really, really like that one. It sounds awesome!
 
Please list the island nations that have gone underwater.
I don't know any yet that are completely under, but they're all losing land now: Bahamas, Maldives, etc. The slow process gives warning to do something now while they have options. Sea level rise is uneven, with millimeters per year on some coasts and centimeters on other coasts. The icecaps melting completely will probably take centuries, with up to 60 meters of sea level rise, and then many nations will be gone, including Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, etc. Many new seas and bays will form, in the Mississippi River Valley, California's Central Valley, southern Australia, the Amazon Basin, etc. A river may connect the Black Sea with the Caspian. Overall, the world will probably gain habitable land with heat distribution becoming more even pole to pole, minus the regions that stay polluted or irradiated for thousands of years.
 
I don't know any yet that are completely under, but they're all losing land now: Bahamas, Maldives, etc. The slow process gives warning to do something now while they have options. Sea level rise is uneven, with millimeters per year on some coasts and centimeters on other coasts. The icecaps melting completely will probably take centuries, with up to 60 meters of sea level rise, and then many nations will be gone, including Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, etc. Many new seas and bays will form, in the Mississippi River Valley, California's Central Valley, southern Australia, the Amazon Basin, etc. A river may connect the Black Sea with the Caspian. Overall, the world will probably gain habitable land with heat distribution becoming more even pole to pole, minus the regions that stay polluted or irradiated for thousands of years.
It won't be like "Waterworld" because it never was that before. But there have been periods where there was no ice at the poles -- and they all predate the emergence of Homo sapiens -- we're not adapted to that world.
 
No you don't because that never happened.
Oh yes it did. I grew up in Northern California and the state went all out on how we can prepare for the pending cold. People built bunkers and were trying to grow crops underground, new types of insulation were frantically being developed. It was madness for the better part of a decade.
 
MAGA sheep support more air pollution because Crooked Donnie told them to.
As with most things, carbons in the air is a math question. Where are the carbons coming from and how are they getting in the air. Great Britain is .2% of all the pollution in the world. Even if Great Britain could possibly manage to not emit any pollution it would do nothing in “saving the world”.
 
As with most things, carbons in the air is a math question. Where are the carbons coming from and how are they getting in the air. Great Britain is .2% of all the pollution in the world. Even if Great Britain could possibly manage to not emit any pollution it would do nothing in “saving the world”.
Please forgive me, @Mature_fun_wife, but "carbons in the air" will trigger some reflexive laughter from the old timers here. It brings to mind the single most inane post in the history of Literotica, and I am not joking.

Right wing mouthbreather Ishmael (banned here but eventually respawned as "Rebel5Soul") once made the following "scientific" assertion:

"Oil is a renewable resource and there is PEER-REVIEWED science to back this up: Oil is burned by consumers, releasing hydrocarbons into the atmosphere. Hydrocarbons mix with water vapor in clouds, returning to Earth as rain. Since hydrocarbons weigh significantly more than water, they are absorbed into the ground faster, sinking beneath the water table. There they pool into reservoirs and coalesce into petroleum, and the cycle begins anew".

THIS 👆 is the "peer-reviewed science" you are up against here.

"♫♫ It's the circle, the cirrrrrrcle of liiiiifffffffffffffe ♫♫"
 
As with most things, carbons in the air is a math question. Where are the carbons coming from and how are they getting in the air. Great Britain is .2% of all the pollution in the world. Even if Great Britain could possibly manage to not emit any pollution it would do nothing in “saving the world”.

Your support of air pollution is noted. 👍
 
Please forgive me, @Mature_fun_wife, but "carbons in the air" will trigger some reflexive laughter from the old timers here. It brings to mind the single most inane post in the history of Literotica, and I am not joking.

Right wing mouthbreather Ishmael (banned here but eventually respawned as "Rebel5Soul") once made the following "scientific" assertion:

"Oil is a renewable resource and there is PEER-REVIEWED science to back this up: Oil is burned by consumers, releasing hydrocarbons into the atmosphere. Hydrocarbons mix with water vapor in clouds, returning to Earth as rain. Since hydrocarbons weigh significantly more than water, they are absorbed into the ground faster, sinking beneath the water table. There they pool into reservoirs and coalesce into petroleum, and the cycle begins anew".

THIS 👆 is the "peer-reviewed science" you are up against here.

"♫♫ It's the circle, the cirrrrrrcle of liiiiifffffffffffffe ♫♫"
Correct, how many here can grasp that concept though? I was merely focusing on the “pollution” factor and how ludicrous it is.
 
Back
Top