Using basic terms incorrectly...

[richard_daily]

And there aren't thousands of pages of examples that counter my argument.

There are. You've been shown hundreds of pages of it. You've simply chosen to ignore it.

Or you just can't come up with any sort of counterargument other than "look I have proof a socialist says Anarchism is totally left wing!" which is fucking pathetic.

You don't understand what socialism is, anymore than you understand what anarchism is. You have a completely flawed understanding of basic concepts. This Bud's for you!

Just because you can't find where it says "egalitarianism" in the definition and can't explain how the actual definition facilitates or is even tolerant of egalitarianism doesn't make my argument that the definition precludes anarchism from being definitively and inherently a left wing political ideology a nonsensical version of the definition of anarchism.

I showed you contextual situation after contextual situation. Every source out there, including the ones you quoted, shows anarchy as extreme left wing. Left wing means egalitarianism, therefore anarchy is egalitarian. It's basic logic. I'm sorry you're having trouble with it.


Make an argument of your own or cite someone else's specifically reconciling the definition of anarchism (being anti-government authority) with egalitarianism (pro government authority, Socialism and Social Justice) and how it facilitates, advocates or supports it in any way shape form or fashion.[/QUOTE]

 

[BotanyBoy]

There are. You've been shown hundreds of pages of it. You've simply chosen to ignore it.

No there aren't.

You don't understand that hundreds of pages citing socialist claiming that anarchism is really about egalitarianism with no way whatsoever of implementing such absurd bullshit......is NOT a counterargument.

You don't understand what socialism is, anymore than you understand what anarchism is. You have a completely flawed understanding of basic concepts. This Bud's for you!

I'm not the one who thinks Soviet Russia and Red China were right wing and capitalist nor am I the one who thinks anarchism is about equality, not anti-government authority.

I'm also not the one who can't explain what they are talking about or point out exactly where I'm wrong about what these things are.

You need to go read the definitions of socialism and anarchism.

I showed you contextual situation after contextual situation. Every source out there, including the ones you quoted, shows anarchy as extreme left wing. Left wing means egalitarianism, therefore anarchy is egalitarian. It's basic logic. I'm sorry you're having trouble with it.

No, it shows some socialist claiming anarchy is left wing and all about equality!!

Which is not the same thing as them defining anarchy as left wing.

The definition says anarchism is a political philosophy that holds all government authority to be undesirable and anarchy as a state of disorder due to lack of authority. Which in the real world doesn't facilitate left wing anything in any way, shape, form or fashion. Because all egalitarianism (leftism) requires government authority to enforce it. Without that socialist and social vengeance warrior putting a gun to everyones head to artificially force egalitarianism...there will be no equality in social and economic status that leftist desire, because people are not equal.

 

[richard_daily]

BB's argument: "Those people that are called anarchists in all of the history books, they're not anarchists!"

Cool story bro.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Opps!

 

[richard_daily]

Opps!

BB has some serious issues, no?

 

[Bad_Doggie]

BB has some serious issues, no?

This.....

(snip)

Words have meanings. They don't mean what you simply want them to mean. They don't mean what you hope they mean. They don't mean what you really, really want them to mean.

Your devolution of these words is a path down the road to stupidity, ignorance, and Khmer Rouge-style totalitarianism.

So now, we have the right not only embracing nazis and fascism, but also communistic propaganda tactics and tendencies as well.

(snip)

Right wing media has done a great job of confusing these folks and conflating basic terms. Right wing media has convinced its audience that nazis are "left wing fascists", and that anyone who they disagree with is a "socialist".

The people running these media outlets know exactly what they're doing, and the path down this road to total ignorance leads to a totalitarian state, with no individual rights or liberty.

(snip)

He's an example of the path we're travelling; where an objective reality can be suspended in favour of alternative facts! Wherever this path is taking us it can't be good.

Woof!