U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You make a statement and can't back it up. It's your MO.
When it comes to being "informed" you're a neophyte compared too me. I'm still waiting for proof that NKs had nukes in the 50s and 60s.
When it comes to being "informed" you're a neophyte compared too me. I'm still waiting for proof that NKs had nukes in the 50s and 60s.
Kim Il-sung was even crazier than his progeny and posterity. I don't see how he could have had nukes and not used them.
The Soviet's didn't give control of the nukes to Crazy old Kim, but they were there. You can bet the farm on that.
I doubt it, I was working on the Atlas ICBM program before I joined the Marine Corps, and you manning a missile battery doesn't give you anymore knowledge of a nuclear warhead than any serviceman standing guard on them aboard ship or on the shore. It certainly doesn't give you superior knowledge of how the NKs are armed. So, show me the proof they had nukes in 50s and 60s.
Nope, no Soviet nucs in North Korea. Their relations fell out in the 1950s. No way the Soviets would give control of anything like this to the North Koreans or that the North Koreans would allow the Soviets to control anything in North Korea. North Korea was a client state of China, although not an easily controlled one--by China or anyone else.
North Korea and the USSR were close allies during the cold war. Their falling out didn't happen until later, when the USSR started crumbling and the Russian Federation took shape in the late 80's, early 90s.
You said the Soviet Union gave them nukes, which is false. You can't find any proof, and you don't have a farm to bet, that's why it's so easy for you to say so.![]()
Nope. The falling out was in the 50s. The Soviets didn't support them in the Korean War and the Kim Il-song became disenchanted with Stalin's attempt to control even before that. I've worked arms control. The Soviets were never dumb enough to put nukes in North Korea. (The Chinese didn't give them much of anything that worked either. Neither the Soviets nor the Chinese were that dumb about North Korea's leadership).
Incidental facts that aren't in dispute. Where is the proof that Soviets gave the NKs nuclear warheads?
I was a cold warrior manning nuclear weapons. You think you know something about what was going on overseas, you know squat.
Spare me the ageist bullshit of being a neophyte compared "too" you. Your lack of knowledge on any number of topics is displayed daily.
I'm sure you're much more informed on the subject of jungle warfare against the Viet-Cong and canned corn than I, but I've forgotten more (and can't discuss even more than that) about nuclear weaponry than you've ever known.
Although they denied active participation, the Soviet Union played a significant, covert role in the conflict through its provision of material, medical services, as well as Soviet pilots and aircrafts (most notably MiG 15 jet fighters), and many aircraft carriers to aid the North Korean-Chinese forces engaged in combat with United Nations Forces during the Korean war.
Soviet military aid was instrumental to equipping both North Korean and Chinese armies in Korea. The Soviet PPSh-41 (nicknamed by US forces the "Burp Gun" after the sound it made) was widely supplied to both armies, as was the T-34/85 tank which was of great importance during the first offensive when no US armor or anti-tank rockets could penetrate its armor.
Soviet material aid was also fundamental for the air force. By April 1950, the Soviet Union had provided 63 of the air force's 178 aircraft.
According to your bio, you were born in 1967, and would have been in your early twenties when the Cold War with the USSR ended.![]()
OK, that's believable. If there were Soviet missiles in Cuba, there might have been Soviet missiles in NK. I just can't buy NK having its own before China did.