Walker Has No College Degree...

[RobDownSouth]

There is no torturing of the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law..." In America people can say what they want. Black people use the N word all day long, yet I've never seen or heard your condemnation of those Americans.<bigot snip>

Did somebody say.....VETTEBINGO?


I-5!
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/vettebingo_zps8643920c.gif

 

[unregistered]

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

God Damn what a dumb bastard, The 2nd Amendment isn't about free speech, it's about the right to keep and bear arms. You continue to demonstrate world class idiocy and a specific lack of education about the Constitution. I pegged you well when I tagged you with the moniker UltraDunce ™. What a dope.

Oh no. I hit 2 instead of 1. For the record, I'm also arguing with another moron about the 2nd amendment on another message board.

wait, you aren't PatriotGunny101 on any other boards are you?

Concentrate on that typo rather than face up to your own cowardice.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

http://couchpirates.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/bingowings_171534a.jpg
Rob's Bingo Wings

It finally comes out, Rob now ascribes his Wednesday night habits to the vetteman. Old Rob flaps his Bingo Wings down Texas way and wants others to believe I'm just like him, typical ascription on Rob's part. I wonder if he knows he inspired the all new "Fat Hate Bingo 3"?

Gutless porker Marine is trying to deflect. Squeal, porky pig, squeal.

You couldn't rise to the challenge, and now you're trying to rewrite history, as loser Vietnam-era Marines often do.

Keep the insults coming, fatty.

The only thing "coming out" is you from the closet.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Yes yes of course, tell us all about it, you big dummy. There is no cowardice on my part, dipshit.

I call 'em as I see 'em.

Cowards always have "reasons" not to stand up to despicable douche-nozzles. Yours is a tortured definition of "Free Speech".

It's not actually your worst trait though, not by a long shot.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Yes yes of course, tell us all about it, you big dummy. There is no cowardice on my part, dipshit.

There is ALWAYS cowardice on your part, you fat lump.

Cowardice defined you in 'Nam, cowardice defines you today.

 

[unregistered]

 

[KingOrfeo]

7-year-old asks Scott Walker, "Do you even care about climate change?" Walker has no coherent answer.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

Considering more than half the country votes that's bullshit, what you mean is nobody makes it their top priority, but that's because like the debt pushing things down the road is a time honored tradition.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

Nobody who votes cares, the indoctrination of little children notwithstanding.

they should send the creep to jail, it is gonna be a parasite

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Half the country doesn't vote, you idiot.

That depends on the election. In the U.S., about 60% of the voting eligible population votes during presidential election years, and about 40% votes during midterm elections.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Nobody who votes cares, the indoctrination of little children notwithstanding.

I repeat:

The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is extremely likely (at least 95% probability) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels. In addition, it is likely that some potential further greenhouse gas warming has been offset by increased aerosols.[1][2][3][4] This scientific consensus is expressed in synthesis reports, by scientific bodies of national or international standing, and by surveys of opinion among climate scientists. Individual scientists, universities, and laboratories contribute to the overall scientific opinion via their peer-reviewed publications, and the areas of collective agreement and relative certainty are summarised in these high level reports and surveys.

(I suppose now you're gonna tell me Wikipedia, founded by the Objectivist Jimmy Wales, has a liberal bias.)

And:

Scientific consensus

A scientific consensus is reached when the vast majority of the scientists involved in a discipline broadly agree on the interpretation of the evidence pertaining to a specific scientific question. When this occurs the case can be considered to have been demonstrated and the burden of proof then falls on those who would dispute the consensus. The following national and international organizations are part of the consensus that global warming is a real phenomenon for which humans are responsible:
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
The Royal Society of the UK (RS)
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS)
UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
And many more.

Though some have taken non-committal stances, the vast majority of scientific bodies are convinced by the evidence.[14] In addition, those pinko tree-huggers at the Pentagon now rank global warming as a "destabilizing force" (damn enviro-weenies).[15][16]

 

[Sean Renaud]

Half the country doesn't vote, you idiot.

So what's that really got to do with anything? You don't really think that the people who are big on the enviroment are the ones who don't vote vs it being roughly spread out over the entire country.

 

[unregistered]

 

[KingOrfeo]

It addresses your false claim that half the nation votes, for openers.

Your claim that "Nobody who votes cares" about climate change was the false one.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

It addresses your false claim that half the nation votes, for openers.

On average 60% of eligible voters cast ballots in Presidential election years, 40% in mid-term elections.. making the average voter turnout 50%.

I know, math is hard.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Those who do are a distinct minority, and the issue itself is far down the list of American priorities as presented by a majority of Americans.

Oh, it's far down the list all right; but, 61% believe global warming exists and 48% believe it is a major threat to the U.S.

There are some folks here who like Unicorns and Fairies too, but of what consequence?

None, but anthropogenic climate change exists and is a real threat.

 

[sr71plt]

Those who do are a distinct minority,

Oh, I don't think that's true. Nor do I think you have any credible stats in hand to back up the claim. So, I'll just dismiss it as you being you.

 

[unregistered]

 

[KingOrfeo]

Please, be my guest, go ahead and side with the looney left. I do ask one consideration, read this rebuttal of the alleged "consensus" of those scientists who believe in man caused climate change:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136

A small tease from the above:

"Of the various petitions on global warming circulated for signatures by scientists, the one by the Petition Project, a group of physicists and physical chemists based in La Jolla, Calif., has by far the most signatures—more than 31,000 (more than 9,000 with a Ph.D.). It was most recently published in 2009, and most signers were added or reaffirmed since 2007. The petition states that "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of . . . carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate."

I've seen such petitions purportedly signed by scientists before, but for some reason the scientists are almost never climatologists. E.g., the Oregon Petition:

Specialist in everything

However, even if one were to assume that every single signature the petition has gathered was genuine, the petition fails in three other regards:
* The validity of science is determined by the veracity of the evidence, not the number of people who think a scientific proposition is true. Thus the petition is little more than an example of argument from popularity.
* Even if scientific truth could be derived from the people who accept it, the number of signatures is only a small fraction of all scientists.
* Even by the admission and records of the petition itself, only a tiny fraction of the people who signed the petition hold a degree in any field relevant or related to climatology, with the plurality of signatures coming from engineers,[8] who are not scientists. The petition might as well be from the general public.