Wanker or thinker?

[milfylata]

I've noticed something on these forums. There is a great distinction between two groups of people. Wankers and thinkers. It's as if the forums are permanently divided between the two. Wankers who chase cheap thrills and thinkers who delve deep into the erotic literature and are very invested. I think I'm somewhere in between and I want to try to bring them together! So, connoisseurs of literotica, is the person above a wanker or a thinker?

PS: Deep inside, I know that the thinkers won't even consider entering this thread.

 

[hugh_jarce69]

Erm……I was thinking of having a wank

 

[NGrey]

Its an interesting perspective. I suspect most people are a bit if both, but there Lit contributions reflect their current situation.

If they are as horney as hell or life filled with mundane c**p then focussing on the short term thrills is likely.
Taking time to delve into erotic literature however may need some personal space and be easier for some.

These are just my thoughrs based on my own experience - and almost certainly wrong. So be kind to me when you tell me so.

Thanks for the thoughts @milfylata

 

[milfylata]

Its an interesting perspective. I suspect most people are a bit if both, but there Lit contributions reflect their current situation.

If they are as horney as hell or life filled with mundane c**p then focussing on the short term thrills is likely.
Taking time to delve into erotic literature however may need some personal space and be easier for some.

These are just my thoughrs based on my own experience - and almost certainly wrong. So be kind to me when you tell me so.

Thanks for the thoughts @milfylata

I'm waiting for a thinker to respond!

 

[NGrey]

I'm waiting for a thinker to respond!

Im thinking hard how to respond

 

[richfun]

Different sections of the brain ?
On Star Trek the energuser goes wrong andcspkits James Kirk into two. The rational planner, with conscience. And aggressive, packed with emotions, good and bad. Both are dying. Only by hinting can he live and thrive.
So, in a "nut" shell, it seems every human is a wanker and a thinker.

 

[milfylata]

Im thinking hard how to respond

A thinker would've responded with three paragraphs by now! You're clearly a wanker!

 

[NGrey]

I gave you 3 short paragraphs - a concise thinker
So you need a writer and a thinker

 

[richfun]

I've noticed something on these forums. There is a great distinction between two groups of people. Wankers and thinkers. It's as if the forums are permanently divided between the two. Wankers who chase cheap thrills and thinkers who delve deep into the erotic literature and are very invested. I think I'm somewhere in between and I want to try to bring them together! So, connoisseurs of literotica, is the person above a wanker or a thinker?

PS: Deep inside, I know that the thinkers won't even consider entering this thread.

That is fascinating. As you say, we all are to an extent both. Maybe question is which is stronger in a person ?

Me gentleish but sometimes sexual desire can be almost frightening.
But that instinct of desire, "lust" should not be stronger than our consideration of another person, or people. If it is, then probably trouble coming.

 

[NGrey]

Mmmm - how our horniness is focussed on others is probably a big part of fetishes and BDSM - what do we need from them? What do we want to give to them? Im very giving, but I need their need. If that makes sense. I want to fulfil their desires and wanton abandonment.
Its hard to combine that need and consideration - its easy to fall of one side or other.

Says me being a wanker

 

[hugh_jarce69]

If you merge the two words you end up with either wanker or thinker.

So it seems we are both.

I might start as a wanker & finish as a wanker. Then I might start as a thinker but often, not always, end up as a wanker.
So there are times when I start as a thinker & remain a thinker.

 

[NGrey]

Nicely put!