koalabear
~Armed and Fuzzy~
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
- Posts
- 101,964
It's nice to see slob hasn't changed his posting style.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I may get out the roto-router and clear those pipes with a nuclear Iggy. He used to be somewhat interesting before he went insane and decided to preserve his brain in alcohol so it could be studied at length by Entomologists.![]()
It's nice to see slob hasn't changed his posting style.
Whether they are or not, most of the weasels who live in my Iggy Land seem to be the same mindless whackjob using different names. The funny part is they still direct their posts at me, as if I can see them.
Usually, you have to read into the middle of the first paragraph before the flaw in the logic becomes apparent. At least this author begins his story with the flawed premise.
And the usual piglets are lapping it up at the trough.
Too funny!![]()
When has healthcare ever been defined to just having a disease?
Is that what you call healthcare reform?
Broken bones? Sorry, not a disease.
Burned in a fire? Sorry, not a disease.
Severe head trauma? Sorry, not a disease.
etc. etc. etc.
"Pregnancy is not a disease. Hence abortion, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care."
Show me the flaw zipperhead, not your broken bones analogy which I already showed to be a failure since we don't amputate broken limbs.
Pregnancy, is not a disease, pregnancy is the circle of life. You get pregnant by fucking. If you fuck you can ACTUALLY get a disease that CAN be prevented just like pregnancy. We treat sexually transmitted diseases, not sexually transmitted "regrets."
The flaw is that healthcare covers a lot more than just diseases. That's a terrible basis for determining coverage.
You didn't show anything to be a failure except your ability to use basic logic. Of course that's not surprising when you have to do try and justify stupidity.
(CNSNews.com) - Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said the White House and the Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives have been pressuring him not to speak out on the "compromise" abortion language in the Senate version of the health care bill.
*
“They think I shouldn’t be expressing my views on this bill until they get a chance to try to sell me the language,” Stupak told CNSNews.com in an interview on Tuesday. “Well, I don’t need anyone to sell me the language. I can read it. I’ve seen it. I’ve worked with it. I know what it says. I don’t need to have a conference with the White House. I have the legislation in front of me here.”
*
The Michigan Democrat succeeded last month in getting 64 House Democrats to join him in attaching his pro-life amendment to the House version of the health-care bill. The “Stupak amendment,” as the provision is known, would prohibit the federal government from allocating taxpayer money to pay for*any part of any health insurance plan that covers abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger.*
*
Stupak had contact with the White House last weekend, when the Senate voted 60 to 40 in the wee hours of Monday morning to shut off debate on the Senate version of the bill.
*
The current version of the Senate bill contains so-called “compromise” language crafted by Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.). This language*does not*bar taxpayer funding of health plans that cover abortion, but does create a firewall to supposedly keep federal money from being used to pay for abortions.*Over the weekend, Stupak*issued a statement calling the*proposed Senate language "unacceptable."
"A review of the Senate language indicates a dramatic shift in federal policy that would allow the*federal government to subsidize insurance policies with abortion coverage," said the statement.
*
In his interview with CNSNews.com on Tuesday, Stupak said that the White House "asked me just to hold off for awhile and not to say anything about this language. But as soon as the news broke that they had this [compromise], and they got the 60 votes, folks were asking me, and I’m not going to run from the issue I’m going to stand up and say, ‘Look, here’s my objections.' Here – it’s not just my objections – but there’s a number of my [colleagues] who feel strongly about this issue, and these are the parts that have to be fixed.”
You don't know logic from rhetorical fallacy.
"Pregnancy is not a disease. Hence abortion, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care. "
P -> Q
A broken bone is not a disease. Hence amputation, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care.
Burned is not a disease. Hence euthanasia, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care.
Head Trauma is not a disease. Hence sucking out the brain, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care.
And, zip, that's not MY definition of being a racist, it's the Democratic definition of being a racist. I'm just using it liberally.
![]()
![]()
You are too stupid for words.
wok
It's not just the editors at National Review saying it, it's not just Kathleen Sebelius explaining the mechanism to you, it's also Democratic lawmakers:
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/58921
Abortion is something the Democrats want you to focus on.
That way they don't have to discuss why they want to create a right that demands theft in order to be actualized.
Uh huh. Right now, there are some votes going on in the Senate on C-Span 2, so that is a little more exciting.
You don't know logic from rhetorical fallacy.
"Pregnancy is not a disease. Hence abortion, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care. "
P -> Q
A broken bone is not a disease. Hence amputation, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care.
Burned is not a disease. Hence euthanasia, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care.
Head Trauma is not a disease. Hence sucking out the brain, in the vast majority of cases, is not health care.
And, zip, that's not MY definition of being a racist, it's the Democratic definition of being a racist. I'm just using it liberally.
![]()
![]()
Pregancy is health care, so why not abortion?