LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

What did you crazy fascist Tea-tards bitch about before Obama?

Janeane Garofalo said it best, they'll believe anything you tell them except the truth.
 
vetteman said:
Ahahahaha...I just saw this...let me tell you something Lil' Sarah, with lil' tits, from lil' tiny town ranch, This liberal canard has been refuted twice by me, and by others as well. It's an idiotic exercise in bullshit. You haven't proved shit except you have a tiny brain to go along with the rest of your tiny self.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=49822221&postcount=47

The Myth of Red State Welfare
By Sierra Rayne

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/...#ixzz2hRGF2yPA

Go here and observe the total expenditures for welfare by state, add up the totals for your "red" and "blue" states and report back which group consumes the most tax money for welfare:

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/compare_state_spending_2014m40a

Being a shavetail noob you're unaware that better minds than yours have advanced this bullshit and have had their tender ass cheeks relentlessly dragged back and forth over Lit's conservative cheese shredder. When you grow yours back and can sit down in front of your computer again come back and give it another try.
Click to expand...

Apparently, your "source" decided to delete itself.

Not Found

The requested URL /2013/... was not found on this server.
Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) Server at www.americanthinker.com Port 80
Click to expand...

I wonder why?
 
lilsarah91 said:
You all are fucking nuts and so blinded by hate that you don't actually bother to look up to see what you hear is on AM Talk radio, or Fox News, that one guy you overheard at the coffee shop talking, to see if any of it's true or not.

So I'm curious, what did you fucking fascist conspiracy tin-foil hat waring Tea-tard nut balls bitch, moan and cry about before Obama.
Click to expand...

I'd say Clinton.

(-dons white oversized suit and chops on forearm-)
Same as it ever was...
Same as it EVER was...
 
lilsarah91 said:
You all are fucking nuts and so blinded by hate that you don't actually bother to look up to see what you hear is on AM Talk radio, or Fox News, that one guy you overheard at the coffee shop talking, to see if any of it's true or not.

So I'm curious, what did you fucking fascist conspiracy tin-foil hat waring Tea-tard nut balls bitch, moan and cry about before Obama.
Click to expand...

Hah! For a good time, call lilsarah91, because this is awesome. :)
 
richard_daily said:
Agreed. Very little thinking going on, and patently un-american.
Click to expand...

And, of course, they (and Vetteman) miss the point - Yes, there may be many blue states that have people on Welfare - however, when you look at states that take more federal funds than they put in - in the form of taxes, they are - for the most part - red states.

Actually, the money that is invested into programs such as welfare, unemployment, etc. is a pretty sound investment, because the money goes right into the economy to pay for food, clothing, etc. If we look at corporate welfare - of which the government spends something on the order of 80 times as much money on - the bulk of that investment isn't turned into the economy again. So why are we investing far many more billions in corporate subsidies to companies who are making record profits and not, in turn, hiring more people or paying the workers currently on their roles more? Worker's wages have stayed basically flat for 30 years. CEO's salaries and bonuses, meantime, have increased exponentially.

Does it make sense to subsidize huge corporations while cutting food stamps for people who are working, but can't make ends meet? Not in my view - nor, in my opinion, anyone who takes the United in United States seriously. We're all in this together, and I don't know how anyone with any sense of morality or compassion can sit idly by while people starve.
 
Nigel said:
And, of course, they (and Vetteman) miss the point - Yes, there may be many blue states that have people on Welfare - however, when you look at states that take more federal funds than they put in - in the form of taxes, they are - for the most part - red states.

Actually, the money that is invested into programs such as welfare, unemployment, etc. is a pretty sound investment, because the money goes right into the economy to pay for food, clothing, etc. If we look at corporate welfare - of which the government spends something on the order of 80 times as much money on - the bulk of that investment isn't turned into the economy again. So why are we investing far many more billions in corporate subsidies to companies who are making record profits and not, in turn, hiring more people or paying the workers currently on their roles more? Worker's wages have stayed basically flat for 30 years. CEO's salaries and bonuses, meantime, have increased exponentially.

Does it make sense to subsidize huge corporations while cutting food stamps for people who are working, but can't make ends meet? Not in my view - nor, in my opinion, anyone who takes the United in United States seriously. We're all in this together, and I don't know how anyone with any sense of morality or compassion can sit idly by while people starve.
Click to expand...

Welfare a good investment? I've heard it all now. We've got a massive restive population that know they don't have work, fend for themselves because of transfer payments. How in God's name could this be a good investment I'll never know. The tea party phenomenon came about simply as a natural push back against the welfare state by those that pay the bills, work, build, invest. The welfare state could not exist without them. They are the true "forgotten man". Here's the wikipedia entry for the "forgotten man":

Yale University professor William Graham Sumner (October 30, 1840 – April 12, 1910) had a different meaning of the forgotten man. His algebraic definition of the forgotten man was "c", who is coerced into helping the man at the economic bottom "x", by "a" and "b" who demand charity for "x".[2]

As soon as A observes something which seems to him wrong, from which X is suffering, A talks it over with B, and A and B then propose to get a law passed to remedy the evil and help X. Their law always proposes to determine what C shall do for X, or, in better case, what A, B, and C shall do for X... What I want to do is to look up C. I want to show you what manner of man he is. I call him the Forgotten Man. perhaps the appellation is not strictly correct. he is the man who never is thought of.... I call him the forgotten man... He works, he votes, generally he prays—but he always pays..."
 
How did I miss this post? They bitched about the Clintons, accusing Hillary of being a lesbian.
 
lilsarah91 said:
You all are fucking nuts and so blinded by hate that you don't actually bother to look up to see what you hear is on AM Talk radio, or Fox News, that one guy you overheard at the coffee shop talking, to see if any of it's true or not.

So I'm curious, what did you fucking fascist conspiracy tin-foil hat waring Tea-tard nut balls bitch, moan and cry about before Obama.
Click to expand...

Bush.
 
Openmymind said:
Welfare a good investment? I've heard it all now. We've got a massive restive population that know they don't have work, fend for themselves because of transfer payments. How in God's name could this be a good investment I'll never know. The tea party phenomenon came about simply as a natural push back against the welfare state by those that pay the bills, work, build, invest. The welfare state could not exist without them. They are the true "forgotten man". Here's the wikipedia entry for the "forgotten man":

Yale University professor William Graham Sumner (October 30, 1840 – April 12, 1910) had a different meaning of the forgotten man. His algebraic definition of the forgotten man was "c", who is coerced into helping the man at the economic bottom "x", by "a" and "b" who demand charity for "x".[2]

As soon as A observes something which seems to him wrong, from which X is suffering, A talks it over with B, and A and B then propose to get a law passed to remedy the evil and help X. Their law always proposes to determine what C shall do for X, or, in better case, what A, B, and C shall do for X... What I want to do is to look up C. I want to show you what manner of man he is. I call him the Forgotten Man. perhaps the appellation is not strictly correct. he is the man who never is thought of.... I call him the forgotten man... He works, he votes, generally he prays—but he always pays..."
Click to expand...

The Randroids are coming out of the woodwork lately.
 
lilsarah91 said:
You all are fucking nuts and so blinded by hate that you don't actually bother to look up to see what you hear is on AM Talk radio, or Fox News, that one guy you overheard at the coffee shop talking, to see if any of it's true or not.

So I'm curious, what did you fucking fascist conspiracy tin-foil hat waring Tea-tard nut balls bitch, moan and cry about before Obama.
Click to expand...

We bitched about Clinton, GHWB, Jimmy Carter, LBJ, Kennedy, Truman, Roosevelt and so forth. Even Eisenhower was suspected by the leaders of the JBS to be a communist agent in place. Roosevelt a crypto-Jew working for the Rothschilds and so on.
 
Openmymind said:
The tea party phenomenon came about simply as a natural push back against the welfare state by those that pay the bills, work, build, invest. The welfare state could not exist without them. They are the true "forgotten man".
Click to expand...

The last study I saw said that tea party people were overwhelmingly retired and in receipt of SS and Medicare.
 
Sean said:
The last study I saw said that tea party people were overwhelmingly retired and in receipt of SS and Medicare.
Click to expand...

Whatever, dude. I can show you a study that he sun will flame out, or that global warming will make put London and Miami under water. Whoopdy do.
 
Openmymind said:
Whatever, dude. I can show you a study that he sun will flame out, or that global warming will make put London and Miami under water. Whoopdy do.
Click to expand...

So, your rebuttal to my point is that it's true. Okey dokey.
 
lilsarah91 said:
You all are fucking nuts and so blinded by hate that you don't actually bother to look up to see what you hear is on AM Talk radio, or Fox News, that one guy you overheard at the coffee shop talking, to see if any of it's true or not.

So I'm curious, what did you fucking fascist conspiracy tin-foil hat waring Tea-tard nut balls bitch, moan and cry about before Obama.
Click to expand...

What's wrong with hate?

The idea that we all have to "work together" and "get along" is just an intellectual artifact of one particular era in thought.

Spite and malice are not going anywhere.
 
Sean said:
So, your rebuttal to my point is that it's true. Okey dokey.
Click to expand...

Your point is irrelevant. My dad is 85, paid 15% of his income into those programs for 45 years, and did not start taking benefits until he was 70. He believes they need to be fixed or they will bankrupt our country. The question is how do they get fixed, higher taxes or means testing or pushing out the retirement age or getting Government off the economy's back so it can grow putting more people into the tax base or obviously a combination of all the above. Tea partyers believe the left will just add more to the roles and increase taxes on those working. Just because they are now taking returns on what they put in does not necessarily change the fact that they want to see a conservative reform of the system nor does it make them a free loader.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FGB
Obama. Has Your Position Changed?
Replies
6
Views
517
Magnetron
Magnetron
G
Abby's World
Replies
2
Views
3K
GoddessSarah
G
THROBBS
ABC Exhausting, though not Exhaustive
Replies
9
Views
8K
Sunlover102
Sunlover102
musicankane
The Place
2
Replies
25
Views
1K
princesssexci
princesssexci
K
18 Crazy Right-Wing Myths About Obama, Debunked
2 3
Replies
51
Views
2K
Sean Renaud
Sean Renaud
Back
Top