Leadership of the government and the right to approve/veto bills voted by the parliament.Which “intermediate state” do you favor? How much power do you want a king to have?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Leadership of the government and the right to approve/veto bills voted by the parliament.Which “intermediate state” do you favor? How much power do you want a king to have?
That would lead to the monarchy being able to select or reject bills that suited its own position.Leadership of the government and the right to approve/veto bills voted by the parliament.
No form of government is perfect.That would lead to the monarchy being able to select or reject bills that suited its own position.
The French royal family bankrupted the economy in the 18th century and refused any attempt rein in its spending or reform their finances. This was a major cause of the French Revolution, and we all know what happened to the royals.
Not perfect?No form of government is perfect.
Such things have happened in democracies too.Not perfect?
The Bourbon family lavished the French treasury on itself and its aristocratic friends while a huge proportion of the country starved. Then they used their power of veto to prevent anyone stopping them, even when the country was bankrupt. This led to the Reign of Terror where tens of thousands died.
It's happening right before our eyes.Such things have happened in democracies too.
It happens in a democracy when those in power try to cling on when their time is done, and we've seen that recently. Not with anywhere near the same levels of violence and destruction though. Problem with the monarchy you're proposing is that you're baking it in to the system. There's no way to get rid of them short of cutting their heads off no matter what they do.Such things have happened in democracies too.
That sounds remarkably like America in 2023.
And your alternative is to change governments through elections until you find the "right" one, weakening the country's economy due to the instability that ensues from the consecutive changes of government?It happens in a democracy when those in power try to cling on when their time is done, and we've seen that recently. Not with anywhere near the same levels of violence and destruction though. Problem with the monarchy you're proposing is that you're baking it in to the system. There's no way to get rid of them short of cutting their heads off no matter what they do.
I don't see what prevents democracies from invading other countries. The USA does it all the time, and Russia too, lately.Another problem with monarchs is they start to eye up each other's territory, then gather up troops for an invasion. Only takes a quick skim through European history to see how that goes.
No one has said that democracy is perfect, we all know that it isn't. However, it does mean that the people in charge have to manage a system that keeps the majority of the population reasonably happy or they get kicked out. It also means that those in charge can relate to the way that average people live. Economic instability caused by a change of government is quite rare. Markets may fall or rally, but there are no economic collapses or runs on the banking system.And your alternative is to change governments through elections until you find the "right" one, weakening the country's economy due to the instability that ensues from the consecutive changes of government?
Also, mind that whenever a monarchy ended with a revolution, including the French monarchy you accused, that led to chaos and an even more autocratic regime (France 1789, Russia 1917, China 1912).
I don't see what prevents democracies from invading other countries. The USA does it all the time, and Russia too, lately.
You're delusional.No one has said that democracy is perfect, we all know that it isn't. However, it does mean that the people in charge have to manage a system that keeps the majority of the population reasonably happy or they get kicked out. It also means that those in charge can relate to the way that average people live. Economic instability caused by a change of government is quite rare. Markets may fall or rally, but there are no economic collapses or runs on the banking system.
It's true. Democracy is the worst form of governance. Except for all the other ones.Democracy's overrated. Have you ever heard any of the committee jokes?
I did.You should attribute your quotes.
![]()
![]()
Yeah, sorry. I thought I put it originally, realised I hadn't, but must've fixed it right as you posted. My bad and thanks for the heads up nonetheless.Sorry. I didn't see that the first time. Late edit?

You want the the wealth and resources of a country to be handed to one family to do with as they please and think that's going work out really well. And I'm the delusional one?You're delusional.