Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This thread is absurd. The officers actions were entirely reasonable particularly considering that the arrested man was an habitual criminal. The only complaint should be against the police chief for failing to give them the support they deserved.
Ask yourself this. How would you arrest the guy and keep control of the horse?
This thread is absurd. The officers actions were entirely reasonable particularly considering that the arrested man was an habitual criminal. The only complaint should be against the police chief for failing to give them the support they deserved.
Ask yourself this. How would you arrest the guy and keep control of the horse?
NIGGERS always need to BITCH about something
This thread is absurd.
Ahem.
No one gives two farts about facts,
It's all about the photo emotion.
The reporters name is John Wayne
This thread is absurd. The officers actions were entirely reasonable particularly considering that the arrested man was an habitual criminal. The only complaint should be against the police chief for failing to give them the support they deserved.
Ask yourself this. How would you arrest the guy and keep control of the horse?
Ahem.
No one gives two farts about facts,
It's all about the photo emotion.
It's all about public perception. Galveston Texas is a tourist town. They have a beach strip and an aging downtown pier district where two cruise ships berth. On cruise days there are huge crushes of people. The city fathers of Galveston have tried to do a good job gentrifying the downtown pier district, froo froo coffee shops, small plate restaurants, art galleries, etc. They've renovated older hotels and pushed hard for cruise goers to spend the night there before cruises. They created mounted horseback cops to control the crowds especially at busy intersections.
There's no doubt that the evildoer was trespassing, he'd been warned before.
BUT....the police procedures specifically said that mounted officers who arrest someone were to call for a police vehicle for transport. For whatever reason, the mounted cops did not follow procedure, instead parading him 8 blocks through the crowded pier front to the police precinct in the middle of town.
The city fathers are pissed off, the police chief is pissed off that procedures were not followed. The stupid actions of the mounted cops gave the city a huge public relations black eye at a time when every tourist dollar counts.
I seriously doubt those officers will be riding horses for the police force again anytime soon.
https://www.galvnews.com/news/free/article_19ec0d17-b4a6-5717-90b7-e4decbab9078.html
These two need to be fired immediately and stripped of their certifications and pensions.
It's all about public perception. Galveston Texas is a tourist town. They have a beach strip and an aging downtown pier district where two cruise ships berth. They created mounted horseback cops to control the crowds especially at busy intersections.
There's no doubt that the evildoer was trespassing, he'd been warned before.
BUT....the police procedures specifically said that mounted officers who arrest someone were to call for a police vehicle for transport. For whatever reason, the mounted cops did not follow procedure, instead parading him 8 blocks through the crowded pier front to the police precinct in the middle of town.
The city fathers are pissed off, the police chief is pissed off that procedures were not followed. The stupid actions of the mounted cops gave the city a huge public relations black eye at a time when every tourist dollar counts.
I seriously doubt those officers will be riding horses for the police force again anytime soon.
Aside from everything else, there is a safety issue. While these horses are highly trained, there have been incidents where one has bolted. What happens to the cuffed suspect if that happens?
The positive thing is that the chief immediately recognized that yeah, this was a massive fuckup. I imagine that helped.
My own impression of race relations in Galveston, as someone who has been there a few times, is that it's not especially tense — it's a beach community, after all, with a long history of folks having had to cooperate to keep above water, metaphorically and occasionally literally — but it's still the South, with the levels of segregation that implies. If you never leave the more touristy parts, you could get the impression that it's an overwhelmingly white city, and that ain't so.
You're absolutely right, and I've been to Galveston about a dozen times as well. Nobody got harmed, but the optics were terrible. And in the Age of Trump, it's "Optics Uber Alles".
That would be my thought since they were only going a block or so.
Aside from everything else, there is a safety issue. While these horses are highly trained, there have been incidents where one has bolted. What happens to the cuffed suspect if that happens?
hell, even if they'd handcuffed the trespasser to one of their stirrups as they rode would have made for better optics than the rope.
The rope is held between the two mounted officers and passed through the perps arms. The rope is NOT tied to anything, it is simply held by the officers as they move. If at any point, if either one of the officers has to take control of the horse for any reason, the rope is simply dropped.
Granted, it is a very old technique, but done properly it is relatively safe for both the officers and the perp.
Cuffing him to the stirrup would have been EXTREMELY dangerous. You can't release the stirrup very quickly and if something goes wrong you endanger the horse, the perp and the mounted officer.
the fact is, one of the mounted officers could have taken control of the other horse whilst the other walked with the man. and photos do not bear out your suggestion that the rope is held between officers and through the perpetrator's arms:The rope is held between the two mounted officers and passed through the perps arms. The rope is NOT tied to anything, it is simply held by the officers as they move. If at any point, if either one of the officers has to take control of the horse for any reason, the rope is simply dropped.
Granted, it is a very old technique, but done properly it is relatively safe for both the officers and the perp.
Cuffing him to the stirrup would have been EXTREMELY dangerous. You can't release the stirrup very quickly and if something goes wrong you endanger the horse, the perp and the mounted officer.