Where is fuckable fifi?

graceanne said:
Hm, I think you protest too much.

YOU'VE GOT HER, DON'T YOU!

sicko :p

LMAO!

In a box under the bed. *snicker*

What?

The box is very comfy and has air holes too!

Fury :rose:
 
FurryFury said:
LMAO!

In a box under the bed. *snicker*

What?

The box is very comfy and has air holes too!

Fury :rose:


Did you leave her any water? Hm? Well, did you?


*shakes head*
 
graceanne said:
Did you leave her any water? Hm? Well, did you?


*shakes head*

Well, in a manner of speaking. You know the story. It uses the lotion or it gets the hose. *shrugs*

Fury :rose:
 
On the advice of counsel, I refuse to answer any questions about fuckable fifi.
 
FurryFury said:
Well, in a manner of speaking. You know the story. It uses the lotion or it gets the hose. *shrugs*

Fury :rose:

Okay, that was evil. I'm in a completely dark house, my father is sleeping on the couch behind me, and I'm trying like hell to choke silently so I don't wake him up because I laughed and then tried to cram it back down again.


:p
 
jadefirefly said:
Okay, that was evil. I'm in a completely dark house, my father is sleeping on the couch behind me, and I'm trying like hell to choke silently so I don't wake him up because I laughed and then tried to cram it back down again.


:p

Yeah, she should post spew alerts, but she doesn't. *glares*
 
If I'd had to clean my mom's laptop because there was mountain dew all over it, I'd have been very grumpy! :p
 
jadefirefly said:
If I'd had to clean my mom's laptop because there was mountain dew all over it, I'd have been very grumpy! :p

So would she have been . . . but that's ok. Just tell her that Fury (who you know from a porn board) made you laugh. I'm sure she'll call Fury up and chew her ass. :p



I'll watch from over here. *waves*
 
ROFL!! Oh, yes, that'd go over great. :p

Then I can tell her that Fury is one of Rebecca's friends.. my mom and Rebecca had a short convo through me about my mother's fish. I'm sure mom would LOVE hearing that!
 
psyconaught said:
LOL, you guys are well cool.

I think I will stay and play a while.

Well... okay...

Just don't touch the cookies, or Grace will bite.



Quick, Rebecca, find fifi a new home! Hurry! :p
 
Xelebes said:
Poodlism?

I'm trying to turn that into something in your lexicon but having difficulties. Poodies? Bah! That sounds like something else. :/
 
psyconaught said:
Should I make sure the door dosen't hit me on the way out ;)

People here in this section of Literotica (and on the GB they disparage, and probably nearly everywhere online) are always jerks to people they don't know who happen to disaplay a certain verve or creativity right from the start. They automatically interpret such a style or flair as an attack. Wherever I go online, I rename myself periodically so I don't ever lose a visceral connection with this essential and rather ugly fact of dear, sweet old humanity. While many people create "alts" or secondary online personas to cause mischief or trick others or to play out some role their "real" persona would be chastized for playing, I do so in order to keep myself alert, aware, and learning about what people really are.

Perhaps the only times the "outsider with flair = threat" rule is broken is if you can convice others you are a celebrity or if you identify as an attractive female on a personal-ad or dating site. In situations where people badly want something from you or accord to you status, you will get your ass kissed no matter what you say or do. Simply asserting your status as an expert won't turn the trick, you have to be a famous or well-liked expert--otherwise doing so will have the opposite effect. The fine old anti-intellectual tradition of America--which dominates an online space such as this one given that most participants are Americans--will cause an even more rabid hostility to the self-proclaimed expert, even if they can prove their expertise. "How DARE he think he's better than I am just because he's written ten books and is revered by academia as an expert in the field!" Note: believing, even correctly, that you know more than someone else about any subject in America is automatically interpreted by the majority as your thinking you are "better" than them. The standard online rule is that the more you know, the more humble you, as a newcomer, has to appear to others in order to be accepted by the group, as you automatically and gravely insult their egos with your knowledge and therefore must make amends for your "presumption!"

Hostility to the outsider is an unchangable fact of online group social existence and simply people doing what their social-animal instincts tell them to do: protect the "herd" from "threatening" outsiders. Since it is an unconscious process that most people cannot help engaging in, it needs to be forgiven if you wish to get along with the majority of not-too-conscious humans probably just doing the best that they can. Online, such primitive behaviors and traits are exaggerated in the absense of other comunicative clues, such as expressions and tones of voice. If you are a stanger and do or say anything out of the pale or even if you just try to act with the aplomb and ease of well-accepted herd members, and, especially if don't flatter or asskiss in order to make your desire to join the herd clear to the more obtuse (but, paradoxically, more vocal) members, you will be unconsciously percieved as a threat and automatically labeled a "troll" or some other denigrating term that boils down to "herd outsider." Usually, if you ignore the initial flack, it dies down. Or you can choose not to ignore it, selectively (my personal choice) or universally.

Some online social gatherings are a bit more advanced that the ones you find on this site. One messageboard I used to participate on, for example, was quite conscious of the hostility and ostracism they subjected innovative and non-asskissing new members to and referred to it as a hazing ritual or rite of passage. The creative, wave-making newcomer's response to this harsh treatment determined whether they were eventually accepted into the herd as a legitimate member or hounded off the board with witch-hunt fervor. This messageboard had a very young average age, and I sometimes wonder if that had something to do with their ability to see their behavior for what it was more clearly than many online groups seem capable of doing.
 
stirbird said:
People here in this section of Literotica (and on the GB they disparage, and probably nearly everywhere online) are always jerks to people they don't know who happen to disaplay a certain verve or creativity right from the start. They automatically interpret such a style or flair as an attack. Wherever I go online, I rename myself periodically so I don't ever lose a visceral connection with this essential and rather ugly fact of dear, sweet old humanity. While many people create "alts" or secondary online personas to cause mischief or trick others or to play out some role their "real" persona would be chastized for playing, I do so in order to keep myself alert, aware, and learning about what people really are.

Perhaps the only times the "outsider with flair = threat" rule is broken is if you can convice others you are a celebrity or if you identify as an attractive female on a personal-ad or dating site. In situations where people badly want something from you or accord to you status, you will get your ass kissed no matter what you say or do. Simply asserting your status as an expert won't turn the trick, you have to be a famous or well-liked expert--otherwise doing so will have the opposite effect. The fine old anti-intellectual tradition of America--which dominates an online space such as this one given that most participants are Americans--will cause an even more rabid hostility to the self-proclaimed expert, even if they can prove their expertise. "How DARE he think he's better than I am just because he's written ten books and is revered by academia as an expert in the field!" Note: believing, even correctly, that you know more than someone else about any subject in America is automatically interpreted by the majority as your thinking you are "better" than them. The standard online rule is that the more you know, the more humble you, as a newcomer, has to appear to others in order to be accepted by the group, as you automatically and gravely insult their egos with your knowledge and therefore must make amends for your "presumption!"

Hostility to the outsider is an unchangable fact of online group social existence and simply people doing what their social-animal instincts tell them to do: protect the "herd" from "threatening" outsiders. Since it is an unconscious process that most people cannot help engaging in, it needs to be forgiven if you wish to get along with the majority of not-too-conscious humans probably just doing the best that they can. Online, such primitive behaviors and traits are exaggerated in the absense of other comunicative clues, such as expressions and tones of voice. If you are a stanger and do or say anything out of the pale or even if you just try to act with the aplomb and ease of well-accepted herd members, and, especially if don't flatter or asskiss in order to make your desire to join the herd clear to the more obtuse (but, paradoxically, more vocal) members, you will be unconsciously percieved as a threat and automatically labeled a "troll" or some other denigrating term that boils down to "herd outsider." Usually, if you ignore the initial flack, it dies down. Or you can choose not to ignore it, selectively (my personal choice) or universally.

Some online social gatherings are a bit more advanced that the ones you find on this site. One messageboard I used to participate on, for example, was quite conscious of the hostility and ostracism they subjected innovative and non-asskissing new members to and referred to it as a hazing ritual or rite of passage. The creative, wave-making newcomer's response to this harsh treatment determined whether they were eventually accepted into the herd as a legitimate member or hounded off the board with witch-hunt fervor. This messageboard had a very young average age, and I sometimes wonder if that had something to do with their ability to see their behavior for what it was more clearly than many online groups seem capable of doing.

Damn, and I thought I was just being funny.

Better than being ignored.

I feed trolls 'cause trolls are people too.
 
Recidiva said:
Damn, and I thought I was just being funny.

Better than being ignored.

I feed trolls 'cause trolls are people too.

I wasn't talking about your comment in particular. I was talking about the general, overall majority reaction to this person in the this thread, which struck me as irrationally hostile--he or she wasn't exactly attacking anyone, and the newcomer's reaction, which seems offended.
 
stirbird said:
I wasn't talking about your comment in particular. I was talking about the general, overall majority reaction to this person in the this thread, which struck me as irrationally hostile--he or she wasn't exactly attacking anyone, and the newcomer's reaction, which seems offended.

Okay, but consider this is a social and public forum.

You don't walk into a bar and say "Who wants to get fucked in the ass, bitch?" without some public takers.

C'mon, social niceties still apply. Rude is answered with rude. Just like real life.

You gotta build up to this sorta thing.
 
Recidiva said:
Okay, but consider this is a social and public forum.

You don't walk into a bar and say "Who wants to get fucked in the ass, bitch?" without some public takers.

C'mon, social niceties still apply. Rude is answered with rude. Just like real life.

You gotta build up to this sorta thing.

I disagree. The bar metaphor is just another name for a closed-off herd. If someone like DVS had made that remark about "so many fuckable sluts" people would have been laughing tolerantly at him, knowing he was just chain-yanking or trying to be funny. Why can't we assume the same motives in a stranger? It was a relatively mild remark.
 
stirbird said:
I disagree. The bar metaphor is just another name for a closed-off herd. If someone like DVS had made that remark about "so many fuckable sluts" people would have been laughing tolerantly at him, knowing he was just chain-yanking or trying to be funny. Why can't we assume the same motives in a stranger? It was a relatively mild remark.

If someone's coming here, they're looking for a response, why not give one?

It'd be a little odd if everyone were welcomed cordially and offered the keys to the place upon entry.

And no fun. Knowing someone breeds familiarity and a sense of what they mean in context.

But you have to talk to them first and see how they respond in order to see their tone. So a joking response (which is mostly what I saw here and he responded to well) is perfect.
 
stirbird said:
I disagree. The bar metaphor is just another name for a closed-off herd. If someone like DVS had made that remark about "so many fuckable sluts" people would have been laughing tolerantly at him, knowing he was just chain-yanking or trying to be funny. Why can't we assume the same motives in a stranger? It was a relatively mild remark.

Um, not that I disagree, but that's not the first thing he said. First he asked where fuckable fi fi was. I see people giggling more over the chicks name than over his comment about fuckable sluts. I'm sorry - the name is funny. Beyond that people on this forum can be a lot worse, and you know it. This has been just a little teasing.
 
psyconaught said:
LOL, you guys are well cool.

I think I will stay and play a while.

Come in, have a seat, enjoy yourself.

FRESH MEAT! :devil:

jadefirefly said:
Well... okay...

Just don't touch the cookies, or Grace will bite.

Narc. :p

Now where are you hiding those cookies? :mad: Don't make me come over there! I know where you live! I can get you and snowy all in one foul swoop. :devil:
 
Back
Top