Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will Obama sue for libel?By "Jett Cross"
Lmao......
Lmao...that's funny....Will Obama sue for libel?
And all that time the RW never stopped depicting him as a slavering fiend who was going to create an Islamo-Communist dictatorship any day now.I have seen him described as almost superhumanly calm under pressure. That was most of his appeal. But he didn't do much to draw severe levels of pressure. Pubs made a big show of opposing him on the ACA, but with the backing of insurers and a Dem majority, it passed easily enough. Pubs quietly went along with him as he quietly went along with or expanded on most of Bush's policies.
He was here to bring us down. He brought in the first big group of Muslim invaders. They were his kind.You notice nobody who starts this kind of thread can ever give any reason why Obama was not a better-than-average president.
Immigrants are not invaders. And saboteurs are not invaders either. And there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to even consider the possibility that Obama's intention at any time in his public career was "to bring us down."He was here to bring us down. He brought in the first big group of Muslim invaders. They were his kind.
I mistyped that as "Spuds Mackenzie," which I now propose be licensed to a maker of vodka. The dog can wear a shapka.And all that time the RW never stopped depicting him as a slavering fiend who was going to create an Islamo-Communist dictatorship any day now.
I mean, it's like casting Bud Mackenzie or the Taco Bell Chihahua as Cujo.
Ten years after he brought them in, the majority are not fluent in the English language. The majority of them, somewhere between 70-80% are still on welfare. The same with the Somalis Biden brought in to create a new voting majority and to loot the country.Immigrants are not invaders. And saboteurs are not invaders either. And there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to even consider the possibility that Obama's intention at any time in his public career was "to bring us down."
So what? There is no conceivable political goal to be gained by any of that. None of these immigrants may OR WILL vote until naturalized, which requires at least seven years of LEGAL residence, and even then they can't be expected to be reliable Dem voters -- socially conservative, that goes for the Muslims as much as for the Latinos. Tucker Carlson really has his head up his Nordic racial superiority when he talks about Dems plotting to replace Anglo-Americans with populations more easily controlled.Ten years after he brought them in, the majority are not fluent in the English language. The majority of them, somewhere between 70-80% are still on welfare. The same with the Somalis Biden brought in to create a new voting majority and to loot the country.
Holy shit.He was here to bring us down. He brought in the first big group of Muslim invaders. They were his kind.
Ten years after he brought them in, the majority are not fluent in the English language. The majority of them, somewhere between 70-80% are still on welfare. The same with the Somalis Biden brought in to create a new voting majority and to loot the country.
In a way, yes: the ugly reaction to his being elected made it a lot more difficult for well-intentioned but naive white people to think racism was already dead.He sure fixed America's racial divide.![]()
They've been banging that drum since before the Civil War (back then it was the Irish). Only the victims have changed.Holy shit.
It would appear the Papist plot the Know Nothings feared then was real and successful, since there is now a Catholic majority on the Supreme Court. (Isn't there? I know there was recently.) That means the next step is to subvert American democracy and install a Catholic prince as Emperor of America. I suppose the Habsburgs are still available. The Bonapartes are probably not quite Catholic enough.In a way, yes: the ugly reaction to his being elected made it a lot more difficult for well-intentioned but naive white people to think racism was already dead.
They've been banging that drum since before the Civil War (back then it was the Irish). Only the victims have changed.
Hope and change ba-be!In a way, yes: the ugly reaction to his being elected made it a lot more difficult for well-intentioned but naive white people to think racism was already dead.
They've been banging that drum since before the Civil War (back then it was the Irish). Only the victims have changed.
What part of that offended you?Hope and change ba-be!![]()
I'm not offended. BO's slogan was hope and change and all you really got was hope.What part of that offended you?
From a British point of view, Barack Obama was a respectful and dignified politician who embodied all the best aspirations of the American Presidential system. He was a President who deserved only respect, unlike the appalling absurdist present nightmare...