Who Really Was Barack Obama?

🔻Most Of Us Still Don’t Understand The True Darkness Of Barack Obama​

But you do, don't you, Rightguide? You understand that the true darkness is the darkness of his skin.

If he'd been white and was, say, Vladimir Putin's bitch, or kowtowed to the Chinese (their trade surplus just surged to a record €1.1 trillion after TACO Trump's tariff tantrum) then you'd be kissing the ground his feet walked on!
 
The point is, they are not a benefit to the country. They are a demonstrable detriment. In fact, they are promoting criminal enterprise and are not amenable to assimilation. They are here to promote their own culture, not ours, and loot our resources.
Then what would be Dems' motive here?

And everything you say about them could have been said about every previous wave of immigrants in the first generation or two. But their descendants are valuable citizens now.
 
They are here to promote their own culture, not ours, and loot our resources.
There is not some clash-of-civilizations competition going on between them. What on Earth are you even talking about?!

Future America will be Anglo-and-Latino, and will still be America -- it's just a new cultural paradigm. (Blacks and Indians are already included in Anglo. Muslims, like Jews, will not be numerous enough to include.)
 
Last edited:
The point is, they are not a benefit to the country. They are a demonstrable detriment. In fact, they are promoting criminal enterprise and are not amenable to assimilation. They are here to promote their own culture, not ours, and loot our resources.
You sound like those idiots who didn't want the Jews, the Catholics, the Irish, the Germans to emigrate to the new world in the 19th century, or the Chinese, Japanese and Eastern/Southern Europeans coming to America at the turn of the 20th century. Remember Charles Ponzi and Lucky Luciano and Fred Drumpf (whose grandson bankrupted casinos and was convicted of 34 felonies)?
 
You sound like those idiots who didn't want the Jews, the Catholics, the Irish, the Germans to emigrate to the new world in the 19th century, or the Chinese, Japanese and Eastern/Southern Europeans coming to America at the turn of the 20th century. Remember Charles Ponzi and Lucky Luciano and Fred Drumpf (whose grandson bankrupted casinos and was convicted of 34 felonies)?
Yah, he would've deported the Irish
 
Yah, he would've deported the Irish
Trump would have deported all those foreign and Jewish scientists and the Nazis would have built the A-bomb first and then the USA would have become a fascist country . . .

. . . on second thought, let's hope Donald Trump doesn't get a time machine!
 
Will the author be sued for libel by the Obamas?
They would have to show some sort of monetary damage to have grounds to do so. If you were a fraction as knowledgeable about the law as you routinely claim to be, you would know that.
 
They would have to show some sort of monetary damage to have grounds to do so. If you were a fraction as knowledgeable about the law as you routinely claim to be, you would know that.
Well, no, in defamation you sue for damage to your reputation and ask the jury to put a money value on it. Proof of actual monetary losses helps but is not strictly necessary. And it's really hard for a public figure -- you have to expect to be lied about a lot anyway -- so you have to show the defendant acted with "actual malice."

It is easier to win defamation suits in the UK than in the U.S. -- that's why the Church of Scientology likes to sue in the UK when it can. I suspect the difference is for cultural reasons -- Brits put a much higher value on reputation than Yanks do.
 
By someone who sold himself to the highest bidder! So he knows what he's talking about! :)
The ghost writer of The Art of the Deal said that the only book he saw in Trump's homes was an anthology of speeches by Adolf Hitler. I own that anthology, and I have read it, along with many other books.

Trump is not nearly as dangerous as Hitler. He is not nearly as evil. The similarities in their personalities are due to the fact that Hitler appealed, and Trump appeals to angry white men.
 
Well, no, in defamation you sue for damage to your reputation and ask the jury to put a money value on it. Proof of actual monetary losses helps but is not strictly necessary. And it's really hard for a public figure -- you have to expect to be lied about a lot anyway -- so you have to show the defendant acted with "actual malice."

It is easier to win defamation suits in the UK than in the U.S. -- that's why the Church of Scientology likes to sue in the UK when it can. I suspect the difference is for cultural reasons -- Brits put a much higher value on reputation than Yanks do.
That doesn't seem to be relevant to the Pedophile's pantomime case in Florida where he's suing the UK BBC for playing clips of him saying stuff, in a program shown in the UK. He's pretending that it caused him billions of dollars in loss by making him win the next election.

I can't understand it either.
 
Back
Top