Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not me dipshit. I've never been an unregistered guest, or anyone else before 2017.how many threads have you created about him?
https://forum.literotica.com/threads/theres-no-end-to-obamas-opulence.735473/
this is my fav![]()
Look it up dummy.Once again, you made up bullshit and got upset by the bullshit you made up.
Mindless MAGA sheep are compulsive bullshitters.
this was a really dumb comment.I've never been an unregistered guest
also dumb, vetteman.or anyone else before 2017.
Thank you for proving my point...
But you do, don't you, Rightguide? You understand that the true darkness is the darkness of his skin.
Most Of Us Still Don’t Understand The True Darkness Of Barack Obama
Then what would be Dems' motive here?The point is, they are not a benefit to the country. They are a demonstrable detriment. In fact, they are promoting criminal enterprise and are not amenable to assimilation. They are here to promote their own culture, not ours, and loot our resources.
There is not some clash-of-civilizations competition going on between them. What on Earth are you even talking about?!They are here to promote their own culture, not ours, and loot our resources.
You sound like those idiots who didn't want the Jews, the Catholics, the Irish, the Germans to emigrate to the new world in the 19th century, or the Chinese, Japanese and Eastern/Southern Europeans coming to America at the turn of the 20th century. Remember Charles Ponzi and Lucky Luciano and Fred Drumpf (whose grandson bankrupted casinos and was convicted of 34 felonies)?The point is, they are not a benefit to the country. They are a demonstrable detriment. In fact, they are promoting criminal enterprise and are not amenable to assimilation. They are here to promote their own culture, not ours, and loot our resources.
Yah, he would've deported the IrishYou sound like those idiots who didn't want the Jews, the Catholics, the Irish, the Germans to emigrate to the new world in the 19th century, or the Chinese, Japanese and Eastern/Southern Europeans coming to America at the turn of the 20th century. Remember Charles Ponzi and Lucky Luciano and Fred Drumpf (whose grandson bankrupted casinos and was convicted of 34 felonies)?
Trump would have deported all those foreign and Jewish scientists and the Nazis would have built the A-bomb first and then the USA would have become a fascist country . . .Yah, he would've deported the Irish
They would have to show some sort of monetary damage to have grounds to do so. If you were a fraction as knowledgeable about the law as you routinely claim to be, you would know that.Will the author be sued for libel by the Obamas?
Well, no, in defamation you sue for damage to your reputation and ask the jury to put a money value on it. Proof of actual monetary losses helps but is not strictly necessary. And it's really hard for a public figure -- you have to expect to be lied about a lot anyway -- so you have to show the defendant acted with "actual malice."They would have to show some sort of monetary damage to have grounds to do so. If you were a fraction as knowledgeable about the law as you routinely claim to be, you would know that.
And Trump did not write that. It was ghost written.The 'Art of the Deal' is selling yourself to the highest bidder.
By someone who sold himself to the highest bidder! So he knows what he's talking about!And Trump did not write that. It was ghost written.
A black President broke them.
The ghost writer of The Art of the Deal said that the only book he saw in Trump's homes was an anthology of speeches by Adolf Hitler. I own that anthology, and I have read it, along with many other books.By someone who sold himself to the highest bidder! So he knows what he's talking about!![]()
That doesn't seem to be relevant to the Pedophile's pantomime case in Florida where he's suing the UK BBC for playing clips of him saying stuff, in a program shown in the UK. He's pretending that it caused him billions of dollars in loss by making him win the next election.Well, no, in defamation you sue for damage to your reputation and ask the jury to put a money value on it. Proof of actual monetary losses helps but is not strictly necessary. And it's really hard for a public figure -- you have to expect to be lied about a lot anyway -- so you have to show the defendant acted with "actual malice."
It is easier to win defamation suits in the UK than in the U.S. -- that's why the Church of Scientology likes to sue in the UK when it can. I suspect the difference is for cultural reasons -- Brits put a much higher value on reputation than Yanks do.
The only point you can never make is that you’re a moron.Thank you for proving my point...
Is this phrased in English? It doesn't quite make sense.The only point you can never make is that you’re a moron.
If you were me people would like you, so yes you would be on invites lists.If I were you, I wouldn't be here.
Only because you don't have a brain.Is this phrased in English? It doesn't quite make sense.
Hmm. Seems to me it was Obama that set up the affordable health insurance and DonOLD who made it crazy expensive.