DEI is no more racist than AA ever was, which is not at all. "Woke" means nothing at all but being AWARE of social injustice,woke is a crime against humanity
DEI is racist
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DEI is no more racist than AA ever was, which is not at all. "Woke" means nothing at all but being AWARE of social injustice,woke is a crime against humanity
DEI is racist
I have a job, own my condo… and you bitches are just incels who fuck blow up dolls and jerk off to BBC porn before posting racist shit.life in poverty must suck. Now I see why you people are so upset. being poor is a personal choice
I don’t like pedophiles or incel bitches
I have a job, own my condo… and you bitches are just incels who fuck blow up dolls and jerk off to BBC porn before posting racist shit.

woke is a telltale sign for bigger mental issuesDEI is no more racist than AA ever was, which is not at all. "Woke" means nothing at all but being AWARE of social injustice,
That analogy collapses immediately, “leftists” have held significant power in the U.S. at multiple points. From the New Deal era under Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Great Society under Lyndon B. Johnson, and more recent unified governments, they’ve absolutely been “on the field.” They’ve also lost power repeatedly through elections, which is what defeat looks like in a democracy.No, it is because LEFTISTS in America never get close enough to power to BE defeated. A minor-league team is never defeated by the Yankees because it never gets to play them.
Critiquing “wokeness” or specific ideological trends isn’t misogyny, it’s a disagreement over ideas, not hostility toward women. Conflating criticism of a framework with hatred of a group collapses the distinction between people and policies and shuts down legitimate debate. Many critics argue that certain strains of “wokeness” produce unintended social or institutional consequences; engaging those arguments on their merits is part of any healthy discourse. Disagreeing with a worldview, even one that claims to speak for women, does not equate to animus toward women themselves. The tendency to default to accusations of misogyny often reflects an unwillingness, or inability, to engage with the substance of the argument, or just plain ignorance.rg kindly described it accurately on another thread:
View attachment 2603121
amazing how deep seated his misogyny is.
This is a true statement. However, mental issues and depression are treatable. Covered by health insurance. I strive to see how health insurance should cover "woke" as I know getting health insurance to cover TDS is considered insurance fraud.woke is a telltale sign for bigger mental issues
Tolerance, respect and understanding of other people from different backgrounds are not "Mental issues."woke is a telltale sign for bigger mental issues
Nothing is leftist unless its success would pose a threat to the plutocracy. Not even FDR rose to that level.That analogy collapses immediately, “leftists” have held significant power in the U.S. at multiple points. From the New Deal era under Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Great Society under Lyndon B. Johnson, and more recent unified governments, they’ve absolutely been “on the field.” They’ve also lost power repeatedly through elections, which is what defeat looks like in a democracy.
I dont recall them ever having any to tell you the TRUTH!Rory pax and wil completely lost any validity of this thread.
Poor pussies.
Yeah, we're not angry racist incel bigots like you. Maybe if we were, we'd be "Manly" enough for your standards, right?Rory pax and wil completely lost any validity of this thread.
Poor pussies.
Awe how cute. pax triggered with a rory nuh memeYeah, we're not angry racist incel bigots like you. Maybe if we were, we'd be "Manly" enough for your standards, right?
This is really important to keep in mind, BTW. At all times.Nothing is leftist unless its success would pose a threat to the plutocracy. Not even FDR rose to that level.
Who are you writing to? Are you seeing things? Hearing things?Since when did being a hateful bigot become cool?
^Probably about the time you stopped calling yourself "Bud Spencer." By the way, How come you never use your Wizzard 1488 or Chobham aliases anymore?
Triggered much?^Writing at YOU, mister former Wizzard, Bud Spencer, Hisarpy, Dan'O'Keefe, and a million other fucking names.
Regardless of what you call yourself, you are a bully and a hateful troll. I've dealt with your kind all through school. You think you are so fucking funny and clever, but all you are is hateful, uneducated, and cruel- because you like being like this. It's all you know. I know exactly what you are. And believe me, what comes around goes around.
BS.Nothing is leftist unless its success would pose a threat to the plutocracy. Not even FDR rose to that level.
You know I'm right.