TN_Vixen
Rear Window
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2000
- Posts
- 7,710
KM..
"drugs" as a category cannot be conceptualized. As we've seen in these posts and posts in the past about the use of drugs, some drugs are considered a lot more harmful than others. The argument that pot is not as harmful as liquor has been around for ages. And, personally.. I think the argument has vailidity.
I was one of the most adament people against drug use growing up and in my early to late teens. I was always taught at home, and fostered frienships with people who found those who used drugs as "losers" or at least lower than my own perceived stature in life.
but then, when I was 18, (yes 18 is kinda old to begin using), I tried pot and realized that I was this mellow, non-agressive, genteel person while under the influence and not only that but the sex was fucking awesome while high. Your senses are heightened and your body responds in a very physical yet cerebral way to the stimulation given. Of course this is addictive, of course it reaps consequences .. so I found out later in life and adjusted so that using pot wasn't a factor in my everyday life.
Other drugs don't necessarily result from the use of mild narcotics such as pot, but statistics show that given use of other drugs previously leads to harder drug use in life as you get older and more willing to experiment with other means of alternative mind states.
I've only experimented with some drugs. Pot being one and coke being another. Once I took extacy and once I ate mushrooms but nothing gave me the mental exhiliration as pot used to in my using days. Pot smokers, from what I recall, are the most non-threatning, nonabusive, non-confrontational people I know.
They are just happy with a sack of weed and a movie on the VCR and a cabinet full of munchies. What's harmful about that?
"drugs" as a category cannot be conceptualized. As we've seen in these posts and posts in the past about the use of drugs, some drugs are considered a lot more harmful than others. The argument that pot is not as harmful as liquor has been around for ages. And, personally.. I think the argument has vailidity.
I was one of the most adament people against drug use growing up and in my early to late teens. I was always taught at home, and fostered frienships with people who found those who used drugs as "losers" or at least lower than my own perceived stature in life.
but then, when I was 18, (yes 18 is kinda old to begin using), I tried pot and realized that I was this mellow, non-agressive, genteel person while under the influence and not only that but the sex was fucking awesome while high. Your senses are heightened and your body responds in a very physical yet cerebral way to the stimulation given. Of course this is addictive, of course it reaps consequences .. so I found out later in life and adjusted so that using pot wasn't a factor in my everyday life.
Other drugs don't necessarily result from the use of mild narcotics such as pot, but statistics show that given use of other drugs previously leads to harder drug use in life as you get older and more willing to experiment with other means of alternative mind states.
I've only experimented with some drugs. Pot being one and coke being another. Once I took extacy and once I ate mushrooms but nothing gave me the mental exhiliration as pot used to in my using days. Pot smokers, from what I recall, are the most non-threatning, nonabusive, non-confrontational people I know.
They are just happy with a sack of weed and a movie on the VCR and a cabinet full of munchies. What's harmful about that?
