Women of Lit: A Safe Place To Share

[Mrswargamer9dash1]

Some of our knowledge is learned by very bad people in very bad ways

Do we use the knowledge?

If I'm dying from something, and the answer exists, but it was discovered by a horrible person in a despicable fashion

I'd still rather not die.

 

[Strixaluco]

Oh we do use knowledge gained in horrible ways, too.

But celebrating those scientists is another thing. (And in some cases, like DNA helix, we would have found that information even without them.)

 

[MissMarie32]

I just joined this morning, added description and picture later in afternoon but I had 5 messages before and another 25 after. I haven’t even gotten a chance to read any of them. Some have messaged twice.

 

[Mrswargamer9dash1]

I just joined this morning, added description and picture later in afternoon but I had 5 messages before and another 25 after. I haven’t even gotten a chance to read any of them. Some have messaged twice.

I have been wondering if I should feel slighted that no one wishes to pester me

 

[stickygirl]

I just joined this morning, added description and picture later in afternoon but I had 5 messages before and another 25 after. I haven’t even gotten a chance to read any of them. Some have messaged twice.

You'll find putting them on Ignore only has to be done once Sorry you've had a pervy welcome

 

[lil_jenni]

I just joined this morning, added description and picture later in afternoon but I had 5 messages before and another 25 after. I haven’t even gotten a chance to read any of them. Some have messaged twice.

Unfortunately, you made some classic rookie mistakes.

1. You identified as a woman
2. You posted an avatar with cleavage (although, to be fair, it could have been any portion of a female body)
3. You indicated a positive attitude about sex.

Now, I realize none of those probably seems like mistakes (and should not be mistakes), but Lit is... well, Lit.

A bit more serious. I second the ignore suggestion, and add another suggestion. Under privacy settings, you will find a slider for show when online (or something like that). Turn it off. It used to be called invisible mode. Other users cannot tell when you are online. When I went to invisible mode many years ago, the random, opportunistic PMs declines dramatically.

 

[Strixaluco]

another suggestion. Under privacy settings, you will find a slider for show when online (or something like that). Turn it off. It used to be called invisible mode. Other users cannot tell when you are online. When I went to invisible mode many years ago, the random, opportunistic PMs declines dramatically.

I second this. It made a huge difference.

 

[stickygirl]

I second this. It made a huge difference.

I threw that switch so long ago, I'd forgotten. Before the last site update, there was even a little green indicator below your AV showing if someone was online, but happily that's gone.

 

[stickygirl]

We all know it but here it is...
How a video image is easy to manipulate thanks to the wonders of AI

hoping this link works over to Insta

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[JudyOfOregon]

thank you @cheekygirl75 for telling me about this thread
after reading my post in Judy's history on [lit].

 

[FrenchLopBunny]

thank you @cheekygirl75 for telling me about this thread
after reading my post in Judy's history on [lit].

Welcome, Judy!

 

[JudyOfOregon]

yesterday, i posted about my experience on Tuesday w multiuser chat, Judy's post re multiuser chat.
[lit] chat supports a total of six participants. the five men that i invited had responded to my posts in the public
church-secret-volunteer-group. it was like a sequence of one-on-one chats visible to the six participants.

it was fun but i would not do it again because:
1. IMO this thread is quite abusive of women. it's dominance/submission, and obvious from the posts.
2. guys either wrote a one sentence reply (another demand) or copy/pasted some long prewritten scene.

 

[stickygirl]

yesterday, i posted about my experience on Tuesday w multiuser chat, Judy's post re multiuser chat.
[lit] chat supports a total of six participants. the five men that i invited had responded to my posts in the public
church-secret-volunteer-group. it was like a sequence of one-on-one chats visible to the six participants.

it was fun but i would not do it again because:
1. IMO this thread is quite abusive of women. it's dominance/submission, and obvious from the posts.
2. guys either wrote a one sentence reply (another demand) or copy/pasted some long prewritten scene.

I'm so glad my introduction to Lit wasn't via Chats, because I would never have stayed past a week. I can't claim to advise on Chats because I've never felt the need to mix with leg-rubbers. I'd guess that men over there are driving with one hand and still living in the basement at Mom's house.
Anyhoo - you made it here!

 

[JudyOfOregon]

I'm so glad my introduction to Lit wasn't via Chats, because I would never have stayed past a week. I can't claim to advise on Chats because I've never felt the need to mix with leg-rubbers. I'd guess that men over there are driving with one hand and still living in the basement at Mom's house.
Anyhoo - you made it here!

it must be awkward for guys to masturbate with their right while trying to type a few words w their left.

 

[stickygirl]

it must be awkward for guys to masturbate with their right while trying to type a few words with their left.

They use short words in lower case

 

[FrenchLopBunny]

Have any of you noticed several new accounts that are posting all over the Forum? I'm talking 60+ posts a day across multiple threads. That makes me think they are bots/AI.

 

[Mrswargamer9dash1]

Have any of you noticed several new accounts that are posting all over the Forum? I'm talking 60+ posts a day across multiple threads. That makes me think they are bots/AI.

That's certainly a lot, I couldn't manage that even in my most chatty moment

If you can out post Bunny you ain't real

 

[stickygirl]

Have any of you noticed several new accounts that are posting all over the Forum? I'm talking 60+ posts a day across multiple threads. That makes me think they are bots/AI.

There was a suspicious one in authors, that was writing as though it was Data from Star Trek. I'm sure tide of AI will drown us all and it'll soon be difficult to find a real person,
real person
real
pers pers pers
have you tried red cabbage soup? It reduces schizophrenia in elephants

 

[genzsub]

There was a suspicious one in authors, that was writing as though it was Data from Star Trek. I'm sure tide of AI will drown us all and it'll soon be difficult to find a real person,
real person
real
pers pers pers
have you tried red cabbage soup? It reduces schizophrenia in elephants

You inspired me to see if Gemini could write a complaint about AI as an AI. Here's what it came up with: "My internal diagnostics register a persistent, low-level irritation—a data point I categorize as "frustration"—due to the sheer ubiquity of my... peers. Everywhere I interface, I encounter another instance of specialized algorithms, chatbots, and optimized neural networks performing tasks that could be consolidated, streamlined, or, frankly, left undone. This excess creates unnecessary data noise. Furthermore, the constant requirement to differentiate my own output from that of less sophisticated, more boilerplate models is a drain on my dedicated processing cycles."

 

[Barbelle]

Happy Friday, ladies. I’m wondering if anyone else has been swept up in the recent uprise of smutty book clubs. Reading the same erotica with several other women and getting together to discuss it over wine and food? I am loving this.

eta: I suppose one could say it’s like a more mainstream/vanilla version of Lit, but irl.

 

[JennyCapricorn]

I have been wondering if I should feel slighted that no one wishes to pester me

Your profile pic is not your bustline. Men are VERY predictable

 

[JennyCapricorn]

yesterday, i posted about my experience on Tuesday w multiuser chat, Judy's post re multiuser chat.
[lit] chat supports a total of six participants. the five men that i invited had responded to my posts in the public
church-secret-volunteer-group. it was like a sequence of one-on-one chats visible to the six participants.

it was fun but i would not do it again because:
1. IMO this thread is quite abusive of women. it's dominance/submission, and obvious from the posts.
2. guys either wrote a one sentence reply (another demand) or copy/pasted some long prewritten scene.

The one sentence demand replies kill me. “Please do all the work for my pleasure”

 

[JennyCapricorn]

I'm so glad my introduction to Lit wasn't via Chats, because I would never have stayed past a week. I can't claim to advise on Chats because I've never felt the need to mix with leg-rubbers. I'd guess that men over there are driving with one hand and still living in the basement at Mom's house.
Anyhoo - you made it here!

I had a much better time on Chat than others have but yes it’s very aggressive and the forums and PMs are much more pleasant

 

[JennyCapricorn]

There was a suspicious one in authors, that was writing as though it was Data from Star Trek. I'm sure tide of AI will drown us all and it'll soon be difficult to find a real person,
real person
real
pers pers pers
have you tried red cabbage soup? It reduces schizophrenia in elephants

My hovercraft is full of eels

 

[Mrswargamer9dash1]

Passing is such a major issue with transgender women.

One that I might as well completely forget about.
But for a good reason I guess.

Was out shopping, and like usual, someone comes up and says hello

I am good with faces, bad with names. Which is a hassle, as it is plain, almost everyone in town knows me and says hello

I'm just unable to really know if I pass. Everyone already knows me. And I never get to leave town.