yowser
xpressive
- Joined
- May 5, 2014
- Posts
- 4,761
@pink_silk_glove
Boneyard
Boneyard is an ambitious and extended tale of erotic horror, with a complex plot and vivid characters. It's a good story, almost a great story.
This was not an easy work to critique, as it is multi-layered, complicated, both subtle and brutal, with a lot of moving parts, all in general handled unusually well. It pulls the reader in different directions, lots of questions emerge, and we get them answered fairly well, with a few exceptions. The goth and 1980’s London club scene feel is conveyed in exquisite detail - sweet.
The scene is set immediately and in engaging detail. We know, or at least get a good idea, fairly quickly, who this couple is, what kinds of things they like, and how they express themselves, a sound beginning.
Goth themes predominate, clothing, behavior, cemetery sex, an engrossing mosaic with a flavor well captured.
As I mentioned in the comment on this tale, my main complaint is that the story would be far improved if pared down, maybe a lot. I think some of the descriptions, while immersive and scene-setting, could be condensed and thus rendered more effectively.
The mood established, goth girl and the various horror aspects, are exceedingly vibrant. I get flavors, lingo, urges, the desire to hover at the edge of normality, in a danger zone of transgression. Descriptions are spot on. (In my comment, I mentioned some aggravation at the extended make-up sessions - also pleading guyhood – but upon reflection I think they are warranted and serve the story well. I still maintain they could have been pared back, with equal if not greater effect in moving things along.)
The sex is highly engaging, the various violent (and threats of violence) are handled well. With the exception of too many vocalizations during sex (oohs, and ahhs) I appreciated at how you held back ever so slightly during the erotic events, resisting the impulse to go overboard. Maybe try describing the noises differently? At least vary how you present them.
A second read through makes me minimize some of my initial complaints, but I will include some just because most readers will only read through once (and as authors we are usually both pleased and lucky to get that much) and my first reactions still may be valuable to you as the author.
I also confess it was only on the second read that I realised this was both for a specific challenge, Tainted Love, and one that involved a particular set of music. My initial reaction about ‘too many lyrics’ thus is considerably weakened, and surely was both deliberate on your part and consciously delivered to your expected readers. I still think you could have done more with less, but that is your authorial choice. (On first pass the lyrics were inconsistently rendered in italic - sometimes yes, sometimes no - but appear to be fixed on the last read, another example of software volatility site-side.)
Also, since personally I am so estranged and isolated (deliberately) from popular culture, I lack both the right and ability to critique music-allusions here, only to remark on such references to the story. Looking at the challenge theme, it appears you have done that effectively, and surely readership should be pleased with their 80’s feast.
Scene breaks are usually handled well, with a few that could be cleaned up. (The first shift from the cemetery to the ‘pitcher of beer’ being poured is one example, more abrupt than it needs to be, or at least the scene change flagged more deliberately.) Pacing is good overall, never too long in any one scene.
I don’t tend to mention scores, but this is another example of a story’s score correlating only tangentially to quality. Numbers here really ought to be more favorable all around, but you’re in a position to understand that.
Once there are more than a couple characters, they need to be kept well delineated. My first read had me thinking a little too hard who the different personalities were, keeping them separated in my head. On second read, you clearly do this fine, more a commentary on a less than close reading. They do exhibit different diction when speaking, vivid clothing and appearance descriptions. Please keep this up in future, maybe sharpen even more the distinctions.
Which brings us to the inevitable discussion about Readers, who are they, and what should the author’s understanding of their wants and needs be? On one level you want to make the process as effortless to traipse along as possible, and good mechanics here make that part easy. On another level you want your readers to be asking questions. Who are these folks? What do they want? What’s going to happen next? All upper-level concerns. In general questions here are addressed suitably, and not all reader questions need to be answered. All I’ll say here is that at some stage of writing, an author should be very conscious about how their words/descriptions/action may be understood. I think you do a decent job of this here, but a little more attention, especially in the final section, would have improved the work.
Boneyard
Boneyard is an ambitious and extended tale of erotic horror, with a complex plot and vivid characters. It's a good story, almost a great story.
This was not an easy work to critique, as it is multi-layered, complicated, both subtle and brutal, with a lot of moving parts, all in general handled unusually well. It pulls the reader in different directions, lots of questions emerge, and we get them answered fairly well, with a few exceptions. The goth and 1980’s London club scene feel is conveyed in exquisite detail - sweet.
The scene is set immediately and in engaging detail. We know, or at least get a good idea, fairly quickly, who this couple is, what kinds of things they like, and how they express themselves, a sound beginning.
Goth themes predominate, clothing, behavior, cemetery sex, an engrossing mosaic with a flavor well captured.
As I mentioned in the comment on this tale, my main complaint is that the story would be far improved if pared down, maybe a lot. I think some of the descriptions, while immersive and scene-setting, could be condensed and thus rendered more effectively.
The mood established, goth girl and the various horror aspects, are exceedingly vibrant. I get flavors, lingo, urges, the desire to hover at the edge of normality, in a danger zone of transgression. Descriptions are spot on. (In my comment, I mentioned some aggravation at the extended make-up sessions - also pleading guyhood – but upon reflection I think they are warranted and serve the story well. I still maintain they could have been pared back, with equal if not greater effect in moving things along.)
The sex is highly engaging, the various violent (and threats of violence) are handled well. With the exception of too many vocalizations during sex (oohs, and ahhs) I appreciated at how you held back ever so slightly during the erotic events, resisting the impulse to go overboard. Maybe try describing the noises differently? At least vary how you present them.
A second read through makes me minimize some of my initial complaints, but I will include some just because most readers will only read through once (and as authors we are usually both pleased and lucky to get that much) and my first reactions still may be valuable to you as the author.
I also confess it was only on the second read that I realised this was both for a specific challenge, Tainted Love, and one that involved a particular set of music. My initial reaction about ‘too many lyrics’ thus is considerably weakened, and surely was both deliberate on your part and consciously delivered to your expected readers. I still think you could have done more with less, but that is your authorial choice. (On first pass the lyrics were inconsistently rendered in italic - sometimes yes, sometimes no - but appear to be fixed on the last read, another example of software volatility site-side.)
Also, since personally I am so estranged and isolated (deliberately) from popular culture, I lack both the right and ability to critique music-allusions here, only to remark on such references to the story. Looking at the challenge theme, it appears you have done that effectively, and surely readership should be pleased with their 80’s feast.
Scene breaks are usually handled well, with a few that could be cleaned up. (The first shift from the cemetery to the ‘pitcher of beer’ being poured is one example, more abrupt than it needs to be, or at least the scene change flagged more deliberately.) Pacing is good overall, never too long in any one scene.
I don’t tend to mention scores, but this is another example of a story’s score correlating only tangentially to quality. Numbers here really ought to be more favorable all around, but you’re in a position to understand that.
Once there are more than a couple characters, they need to be kept well delineated. My first read had me thinking a little too hard who the different personalities were, keeping them separated in my head. On second read, you clearly do this fine, more a commentary on a less than close reading. They do exhibit different diction when speaking, vivid clothing and appearance descriptions. Please keep this up in future, maybe sharpen even more the distinctions.
Which brings us to the inevitable discussion about Readers, who are they, and what should the author’s understanding of their wants and needs be? On one level you want to make the process as effortless to traipse along as possible, and good mechanics here make that part easy. On another level you want your readers to be asking questions. Who are these folks? What do they want? What’s going to happen next? All upper-level concerns. In general questions here are addressed suitably, and not all reader questions need to be answered. All I’ll say here is that at some stage of writing, an author should be very conscious about how their words/descriptions/action may be understood. I think you do a decent job of this here, but a little more attention, especially in the final section, would have improved the work.