Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes and no. I suggest reading the relevant rules etc for yourself. BFW as usual is putting his own spin on things.
I'm just reacting to the discussion. It seems simple enough. BFW is saying that the chapter business isn't in the official rules posted and the responses to him aren't claiming the rule is in the official rules. Seems a straightforward answer would clear that up. This contest really sounds convoluted--and a little screwy, frankly. It certainly is promoting a lot of spitting.
Lauren_Hynde said:Every year, there are concerns about multichapter stories and about the quality of some submissions. Once again we must remind all contestants that the only quality control in place is Laurel, at the moment of approval of the submissions. If you read a story that cannot be understood without reading the others in the series, if it doesn't make sense on its own, or if it doesn't correspond, on its own, to the minimum that can be expected for the category it is placed in, please report the story. If you think that any story you read in Literotica is substandard, please report the story. Let Laurel know about it. That's the only way a quality control can be implemented.
Freddie, I just read your story "Alabama Revenge." It was the first chaptered story in your index so I picked it. I didn't count the words, but I suppose all five parts were about 750 words or a little more. It was five chapters and I voted and commented on the last part. I did that because it was a single story in five parts. It was not five stand-alone stories.
It was actually pretty good, although there were some loose ends and it depended on a huge coincidence.
Yep, runs between 850 and 1,050 words each segment and just one short story in itself (about a page and a half Lit. page total) with no attempt at chapter breaks in content whatsoever.
Only checked it because he constantly yammers about others in this contest doing this--all the while doing it himself.
This is really just one Lit. story of modest length. What folks will do here in glumping up the story file just to make a little cash they claim they don't need.
That seriously didn't surprise you did it?
I don't know about anybody else, but whenever I was participating, I could definitely use any money I won. I know $500 sure would come in handy right now. Too bad I didn't compete this year. (Not that it would have mattered. No way in hell I could get over 600 points... Okay, so technically, I could since I scored 665 back in 2005. However... I don't think I have that many stories in me anymore. That year pretty much killed my muse and she never really came back.)
Well, on the length--yes, sort of. I mean he was so very nasty and condescending about those throwing in short pieces just to qualify them. Seems a little dumb to me.
He's been nasty and condescending about everything. Besides, I'm sure you've heard "methinks he doth protest too much". Maybe he thought if he shouted loud enough about it no one would think he was doing it too.
That about covers it, yeah. Except he has written a fair number of different pieces. About 190 I seem to recall counting.I see. So, instead of 300 stories this year, he has 60 stories cut up into small pieces(?)--and, as Boxlicker has noted, half-baked pieces at that. I see. (Makes me feel pretty good about the 900,000 words I've published with eXcessica in just the last eight months. )
I see.
I shouldn't have to review the rules to follow this discussion (as I said, this whole contest seems Byzantine)--if BFW is wrong, why doesn't someone just cite the official posted rule to him? There should be a comprehensive set of official rules posted, shouldn't there? Everyone's pointing to some sort of informal rule changes. I don't understand why he isn't getting a straight "look at the official posted rules" answer to the objection he posts. Shrug.
If you don't waste your time keeping up with a thread that contains announcements pertaining to the contest you've entered, I guess that's your loss.
But don't go blaming the organisers for your failure.
I shouldn't have to review the rules to follow this discussion (as I said, this whole contest seems Byzantine)--if BFW is wrong, why doesn't someone just cite the official posted rule to him? There should be a comprehensive set of official rules posted, shouldn't there? Everyone's pointing to some sort of informal rule changes. I don't understand why he isn't getting a straight "look at the official posted rules" answer to the objection he posts. Shrug.
Damn, I was hoping a story would post today, but it hasn't.
*Bites nails*
I'm just reacting to the discussion. It seems simple enough. BFW is saying that the chapter business isn't in the official rules posted and the responses to him aren't claiming the rule is in the official rules. Seems a straightforward answer would clear that up. This contest really sounds convoluted--and a little screwy, frankly. It certainly is promoting a lot of spitting.
You mean there are miscellaneous rules running around for this contest that aren't incorporated in the official rules posted? And how would someone starting in the contest in February know that? Surely there's more to this than that. Otherwise . . . wow.
What am I missing?
Same here... I submitted a story yesterday morning, hoping to squeeze it in under the wire (my Christmas contest story posted the *same day* I submitted it), but now I"m afraid it won't post in time to count for this year's contest
You're missing the part where Literotica and it's moderators screws Bostonfictionwriter out of another Survivor Contest win.