BDSM and the female ass

It is a shame that so many of the subs here have no temporary marks or bruising or redness. Just Lilly white nilla asses.
 
WriterDom said:
It is a shame that so many of the subs here have no temporary marks or bruising or redness. Just Lilly white nilla asses.

The results of the first spanking......:D
 

Attachments

  • my hand.jpg
    my hand.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 52
DarkLadyOfDeath said:
Butts... They're good for slapping 'n such.. but not much else...
Use your imagination a little more.
DarkLadyOfDeath said:
Waits for this to turn into an anal subject.
One never need penetrate a pyl's tail, nor use much percussion to cause significant back straightening, eye watering, and vocal shrieking.

The panties worn by the pyl can turn the same pyl into a prostrate, tearful, hoarse plaything well used.
 
Oh, and thanks again, WD-

Thanks to your thread, I got quoted on the "Submissive "Thought of the Day" Calendar" thread. The very first day I actually looked at the thing, no less.

Here's a submissive thought for today: I got quoted for my ass. Even the subs here are treating me as a sex object!

heh. :D Now I'm all hot.
 
Never let them see you sweat ladies

Sadists will
  • deliberately cross the stripes they lay on your ass
  • make you bleed
  • and let the salt accomplish a twofer.
Ahh, how lovely to:
  • be a lazy PYL
  • get what you want twofold with little effort
  • and double once more for getting away with it lazily
The geometric progression just makes me want to ... purrrrrrr.
 
WriterDom said:
I like a woman with some ass. Not huge, but definitely not skinny or flat in the ass. I'm not saying it would be a deal breaker if she was ass challenged. But with a small ass, you almost have to worry about hitting bone when you spank them.

I agree, but if it's a first edition WD, I can make exceptions.
 
Re: Re: BDSM and the female ass

navarre said:
I agree, but if it's a first edition WD, I can make exceptions.

~Innocent Curious Face~ Uhm... first edition WD...? I'm just being morning-dense, aren't I.
 
Re: Re: Re: BDSM and the female ass

Technodivinitas said:
~Innocent Curious Face~ Uhm... first edition WD...? I'm just being morning-dense, aren't I.

First edition=virginal
 
I kinda got that part, but by WD, were you refering to WriterDom's ass? ~looks a bit surprised, but far from shocked~
 
Back
Top