Bramblethorn
Sleep-deprived
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Posts
- 17,793
But society does not have a default moral compass. All you have to do is look at the world around you to see that. Some people think it is acceptable to fly an airplane into a building and kill thousands of people, (9/11) just because they don't like you, or put millions of people they don't like in concentration camps and kill them, (Nazi Germany). Just because you think you have a moral compass, doesn't mean that society does.
Imagine you're an alien scientist, come to study Earth. You send down a probe and it brings back a couple of dozen termites. You give them a battery of intelligence tests, test their ability to solve problems. You'd probably conclude that this is one of the stupidest and least capable creatures in the entire universe, doomed for extinction as soon as something smarter comes along.
Then you travel down to Earth and notice a cluster of buildings, some eight or nine metres tall, intricate as a cathedral, shaped to exploit the sun's movement and air circulation so that they keep their occupants comfortable all year round despite the scorching sun and torrential rain the area can get. The occupants organise to repair their buildings when they get damaged, they go out and forage in very efficient groups, they tend to their children. A group of termites shows behaviour that you'd never be able to predict just by studying a few individual termites - what's known as emergence.
People are like that, but in the reverse direction. ("A person is smart; people are dumb, panicky animals.") We are living in much larger groups than we evolved for, using 21st-century technology with brains that have barely changed from what we had ten thousand years ago. As a result we have some undesirable emergent properties - aka "mob psychology".
So I don't think there's an inherent contradiction between the idea that most individual people are kind and decent folk, and that those same individual people can form organisations (governments, corporations, whatever) that do appalling things to other people.
You can buy a politician, (and subsequently the law), but you can't buy God. When the belief in God, (and church), is strong, society has a moral compass.
Indeed, but not always pointing in the right direction. The 9/11 hijackers believed in God. Ireland has experienced hundreds of years of sectarian violence thanks to Protestant-vs-Catholic conflicts.
When the belief in God and church is weak, you have what you have today: murder/suicides, drug gangs controlling neighborhoods, terrorist threats, etc.
False premise. Media and politics both have an interest in scaring us with the idea that society is becoming more violent and more dangerous, but if you check the numbers, it's not.
The US homicide rate has been steadily declining; the rate for 2012 (most recent data I have) is less than half what it was in 1991. The UK has experienced a similar decline. So has Australia: 2007 (latest data in that source) had the lowest number of homicide victims on record, despite increasing population.
People talk about school massacres in the USA like they started with Columbine, but the worst one in the USA's history was way back in 1927 when Andrew Kehoe murdered 44 people.