YDB95
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 12,086
Lest we forget, all Rep. Waters said was:A congresswoman inciting civil disobedience knowing full well the history of past transgressions would have lead to violence. Can’t accuse her of inciting a riot because the verdict was conviction of murder! We all know what would have happened had Chauvin been acquitted or convicted of a lesser charge. Waters went right to line. Waters should have been charged with jury tampering.
Civil disobedience is non violent till it becomes violent. She knew full well that the situation was a powder keg ready to explode with violence. Unbecoming of a federal lawmaker.
If you construe that as advocating for violence, that says more about your perspective than anything else.The Congress member told protesters they must “stay on the street” and “get more confrontational” so that “they know that we mean business.”
And by definition, civil disobedience is non-violent. If it turns violent, it's no longer civil. See how that works?
Sure enough, nothing there about "leftist kids" cheering him on. No one knows (or at least the reporter didn't know) where that letter from OBL came from, or who circulated it. You don't know if they were leftists or kids, never mind both, and given that the report also touched on pro-Nazi propaganda, if anything, the evidence suggests it was right-wingers.Correction, typo OBL