sandspike
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2002
- Posts
- 413
Tzara said:Well, perhaps.
I think that is overstatement. I would call much of it different art, appealing to a different audience.
Joe Sixpack is not going to sit down and read Pound's Cantos. I very much doubt that anybody is going to just sit down and read the Cantos. Too much personal imagery and obscure referents. But it is something that I think is well worth working through, albeit armed with a couple of interpretive texts to help me understand what the hell old dotty Ezra is talking about.
Accessibility is a matter of style. I find Ted Kooser and Kim (sigh) Addonizio both very straightforward and easy to understand. (Even my autonomic nervous system understands Kim.) Pound and Eliot, or Kenneth Koch for that matter, are poets whose writing I find more obscure. But I still enjoy reading their poetry. It's just more work.
If I want to use a metaphor that most people won't understand (say, piezoelectricity), then I've probably limited my audience significantly. So long as I understand that, I don't see it as a problem.
piezoelectricity? That ain't limited. That is limp. I found it in the dictionary
and found no valve for it in poetry. While I do like your AV's and your poetry,
just tell this dumbass why you would want to write above most readers.
I found that statement shocking. Oh yeah, I have a sixpack and I ain't afraid
to use it.