I have read Marx. I have also read Hitler, the Democrat Party Platform, the Socialist Party information, and UN goals, and the BLM platform stuff (whose founders SAID they are trained Marxists), and on and on... They are all consistently saying the same thing. That's not subjective. That's just fact and observation.
Because originalism is never anything more than ventriloquism in a cemetery.
The very concept of separation of powers comes form an Old Testament passage describing God as Lawgiver, Judge, and King. THE FOUNDERS EXPRESSEDLY WROTE ABOUT THIS, as well as other Scriptural influences. In fact, an early Supreme Court ruling found that a published attack on the Bible amounted to treason because it was an attack on a foundational document for America.
So you know the guy. Which means you know these are facts. And you are being dishonest with history for your own agenda.
The concept of an "evolving document" was never valid, in spite of the ideas imposed by activist justices, because the Constitution was designed to be FIXED LAW AS THE HIGHEST LAW AND AUTHORITY CONTROLING ALL OF AMERICAN GOVERNANCE AND LAW.
That's not a separation of powers. That's what Hamilton called "the very definition of tyranny" -- all powers combined in the same person.
Not in The Federalist.
That is a lie.
I know the guy, which means I know you're lying.
There is PLENTY of scientific evidence for both. Go to the Center For Creation Research, among MANY other resources from the scientific community (and that isn't defined by the Smithsonian and National Geographic), but this is not a conversation for this thread.
It is defined by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The Center for Creation Research is very definitely outside the scientific community -- or would be, if it existed. Perhaps you mean the Institute for Creation Research.
They based it on the need for each of those, recognizing that man is not God, is fallen, therefore needs government, but the government, itself being made up of men, is also a problem, so taking the principle, but separating the powers into check, balances, slow, clunky processes, and accountability, with the ability to be overthrown by the people if it got out of hand.
Blackstone was required reading in Law School BECAUSE the very reasons I cite are true. And I have read him. His law books make good Bible studies on Law, passages of Scripture included, cited, and cross referenced included.
Really? That's what you think was meant by "on the 7th day God rested"?
You're lying.
Yep! Sue me.
I dunno. I guess the Bible has a different definition of resting than I do. I thought resting meant that you were tired. Needed sleep. Needed rest. Why does god need any of that? Meh, I’m gonna stick with her ass being lazy.
Lol. I’m glad we can agree that god allows evil and the killing of an Iranian woman by her brother is just as justified by god as me walking out IKEA without paying for a sofa.
https://regentparents.regent.edu/ac...review/docs/issues/v13n1/13RegentULRev169.pdf
That's from Regent University, you idiot! Nothing of any intellectual honesty or value will ever come out of any institution associated with Pat Robertson!
Your bias does not define a document.
Here's an interesting fact: THE OT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW NOT ENGLISH. The Hebrew word here never has any context of being tired. Maybe stop being lazy in YOUR STUDY.
Not my opinion. What God actually said in Scripture. And it is consistent with the whole of Scripture. You interpret the document by the document and what the Author said He meant. It also talks about Christ BEING our Sabbath. Our restoration of fellowship and enjoyment and worship received. See, the passage is not given to be twisted into any context you like. Your read the WHOLE book as it is written, then understand it in the light of the whole. You know, actual study.
God allows choice because fellowship and relationship is based on choice. God also allows and controls without being the source of evil. He also holds each person accountable for their evil, including that murder and your theft. And He brings it all together for good and glory. And, here is the most important part, it is all about His Glory, not your comfort or opinion.
When God shows up on the scene, it's over. He is there as judge, and if you have rejected Him and His rule you are damned. He holds off judgement so YOU will have the opportunity to be spared. Hos holding back is a MERCY FOR YOUR SAKE!!!
Your idea of a Christian is one who holds liberal positions in a twisted version of Scripture that leaves it to man's ideas to interpret. Problem is that the Bib le says it is not left to ANY PRIVATE interpretation. That it stands on its own interpretation as given in the Bible. Period.
It's nothing God said.
That is heavily quoted and cited. Facts is facts whether or not you like the source. Read it and cross reference. Or are you too lazy?
And THAT statement can only be taken on the bases of the very kind of argument you already labeled illogical.
It's an absolute statement that, in the claim, becomes non-disprovable. Non-testable. In other words, by your definition, unscientific.
