get some conversation going on the HT.

EJFan said:
if taken the wrong way, this makes you sound like a dirty ol' man. :D
This is an honor that I will remember as long as I live (or until I start drooling my cream of wheat every morning).
 
midwestyankee said:
This is an honor that I will remember as long as I live (or until I start drooling my cream of wheat every morning).

Cream of wheat is good with cinnamon.

Welcome back, me!
 
HI BI! :nana:
*waves frantically with exaggerated motions*

glad to see you've come back to join the huddled masses... and, no, this isn't to say there was a massive lit-orgy in your absence.
 
[waves frantically]

shut up, EJ! she doesn't need to know what happened after you streaked the forum!

ed
 
silverwhisper said:
[waves frantically]

shut up, EJ! she doesn't need to know what happened after you streaked the forum!

ed
oh yeah... i forgot about that.

but why doesn't she need to know? i mean, a well informed litizen is what we want, isn't it?
 
And fans of my am pics thread are gonna miss all my good nakedness now, too.

(Wait, you can type bisexplicit again! Score!)
 
bisexplicit Bisexplicit BISEXPLICIT bIsExPlIcIt

yup they fixed it, apparently the word was ****
 
quoll said:
bisexplicit Bisexplicit BISEXPLICIT bIsExPlIcIt

yup they fixed it, apparently the word was ****

Oh, so if you say **** all by itself, it still gets starred out?
 
EJFan said:
i was wondering what that was... why does it do that?

Apparently a fall-out from happenings on the GB - someone's personal information was released, and that was part of their name.
 
bisexplicit said:
Apparently a fall-out from happenings on the GB - someone's personal information was released, and that was part of their name.
ah. good deal... happy to know lit is on top of things like this and looking out for us.
 
Ravin the Poet said:
Is everyone so afraid to give out their name anymore? Everyone has to have a secret identity.
i don't think it's so much GIVING the name as it was given FOR him against his wishes... at least that's how i interpreted it. besides, i think people have a right to minimize the amount of personal information about them that appears on the 'net.
 
Back
Top