Zeb_Carter
.-- - ..-.
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Posts
- 20,583
I think he meant that they would all have to cost that much. Like an ammo tax of $4995 on that .45 round.
That would be fine with me. The revenue could go to paying for all the damage caused by gun fondlers and ammosexuals, both the gun manufacturers' biggest civilian customers.
rj
And politicians being as stupid as they are or devious as they are would only apply that tax to complete rounds, leaving the individual pieces a market price. They may apply the tax to reloading equipment, but that's a one time expenditure. So hunters, most of who reload, wouldn't be effected by the per complete round tax.