HisArpy& "the concepts of Ordered Liberty found in the US Constitution" -- when lobbying against gun control.

[HisArpy]

you're mentaly ill

No, I'm a realist. I understand that if I want to survive I can't depend on someone else to protect me because they have their own priorities.

 

[pecksniff]

No, I'm a realist. I understand that if I want to survive I can't depend on someone else to protect me because they have their own priorities.

You depend on others to protect you every day. That's how society works.

 

[AlexBailey]

Sawed off shotguns, short barreled rifles, Saturday night specials are all legally banned in most states because they are not considered to be weapons that are valuable to a well regulated militia.

 

[ll74]

No, I'm a realist. I understand that if I want to survive I can't depend on someone else to protect me because they have their own priorities.

Since guns don't kill people, then you should realize that you don't need guns to protect yourself

 

[Rightguide]

There is no Australian Gestapo in the news.

You must be a shut in:

https://www.newswars.com/these-videos-prove-australia-is-a-tyrannical-police-state/

https://thefederalist.com/2021/09/0...e-is-what-happens-when-you-give-up-your-guns/

https://catholictruthscotland.com/2021/09/23/totalitarian-australia-a-brutal-police-state/

https://www.australiannationalrevie...lia-has-turned-into-a-dystopian-police-state/

https://www.westernjournal.com/repo...ow-brutal-police-state-thanks-covid-fascists/

https://independentaustralia.net/po...australian-police-state-is-nothing-new-,15587

 

[butters]

Since guns don't kill people, then you should realize that you don't need guns to protect yourself

you just exploded his head

 

[HisArpy]

Since guns don't kill people, then you should realize that you don't need guns to protect yourself

Well of course you don't "need" a gun to protect yourself with. But, if you don't have one when the SHTF, you're only other option is to die.


BTW, your fake schtick on "guns don't kill people" is filled with fallacies. For 1, "guns" don't, the shooter does. For 2, "guns" don't, the bullets that are fired from it do.
That you have to ignore all of that is right up your alley since ignorance is your forte.

 

[HisArpy]

you just exploded his head

So much for me supposedly being on butterz-the-cow's iggy list...

 

[LukSkyFokker]

So much for me supposedly being on butterz-the-cow's iggy list...

Learn how iggy lists work, Dudly.

 

[butters]

Learn how iggy lists work, Dudly.

exactly

• Yesterday at 12:54 PM
• Add bookmark
• #31

[IMG alt="butters"]https://forumfast.litimgs.com/data/avatars/m/1112/1112090.jpg?1652900570[/IMG]

butters​

High on a Hill​

JoinedJul 2009Posts72,636Location....

Since guns don't kill people, then you should realize that you don't need guns to protect yourself

you just exploded his head

Quote Reply
Report Edit Delete

LukSkyFokker​

I'm a Pugilist!​

JoinedNov 2020Posts11,239LocationWhere the Wild Things Are

You are ignoring content by this member. Show ignored content

 

[ll74]

Well of course you don't "need" a gun to protect yourself with. But, if you don't have one when the SHTF, you're only other option is to die.


BTW, your fake schtick on "guns don't kill people" is filled with fallacies. For 1, "guns" don't, the shooter does. For 2, "guns" don't, the bullets that are fired from it do.
That you have to ignore all of that is right up your alley since ignorance is your forte.

"Guns don't kill people" is absolutely horse shit, which is why it's funny to use it when addressing people who declare that more guns are needed.

Like yourself.

 

[Rightguide]

Sawed off shotguns, short barreled rifles, Saturday night specials are all legally banned in most states because they are not considered to be weapons that are valuable to a well regulated militia.

What does that tell you about the AR15?

 

[AlexBailey]

What does that tell you about the AR15?

That they should only be available to a well regulated militia.

 

[HisArpy]

"Guns don't kill people" is absolutely horse shit, which is why it's funny to use it when addressing people who declare that more guns are needed.

Like yourself.

Please explain to the class EXACTLY how an inanimate object suddenly jumps up, loads itself, and starts shooting people.

 

[HisArpy]

exactly

• Yesterday at 12:54 PM
• Add bookmark
• #31

[IMG alt="butters"]https://forumfast.litimgs.com/data/avatars/m/1112/1112090.jpg?1652900570[/IMG]

butters​

High on a Hill​

JoinedJul 2009Posts72,636Location....

you just exploded his head

Quote Reply
Report Edit Delete

[/HEADING][/HEADING]
[HEADING=3][HEADING=3]LukSkyFokker​

I'm a Pugilist!​

JoinedNov 2020Posts11,239LocationWhere the Wild Things Are

Somewhere I'm certain there's a place that this makes sense. It's not in a place anyone other than butterz frequents, but I'm certain that in her world this makes sense.

 

[AlexBailey]

Please explain to the class EXACTLY how an inanimate object suddenly jumps up, loads itself, and starts shooting people.

A friend of mine who is a professional hunter recently shot himself in the leg while exterminating a sounder of more than a dozen wild boar. His use of a semi-auto mini-14 made sense in this case though he is proud to say that he could have been just as effective with a lever-action 30-30.

After spending two short magazines on the pigs he brought his holstered single-action .44 Magnum and his new puppy to inspect the carcases, when another pig he hadn't seen rushed past him. He drew and cocked his revolver but the puppy chased after the pig, running his shot, so he let the hammer down reholstered the gun, and chased the pig and the pup into a small ravine. He jumped down an embankment and stumbled and drew his hand across the hammer, planting a slug between his tibia and fibula. The shot scared the pig and the puppy was okay. He had a nice walk back to the truck.

I asked him about whether guns shoot people and he told me to fuck off.

 

[phrodeau]

Learn how iggy lists work, Dudly.

Somewhere I'm certain there's a place that this makes sense. It's not in a place anyone other than butterz frequents, but I'm certain that in her world this makes sense.

I’m sure you’ll figure it out soon.

 

[HisArpy]

I’m sure you’ll figure it out soon.

GO FUCK YOURSELF

 

[ll74]

Please explain to the class EXACTLY how an inanimate object suddenly jumps up, loads itself, and starts shooting people.

Please explain how a knife and a gun are the same effectiveness in killing people.

(When actually used as a weapon to kill people)

And specifically, do so without involving level of experience in using either weapon. (I.e. attacker has never held either weapon)

 

[HisArpy]

Please explain how a knife and a gun are the same effectiveness in killing people.

(When actually used as a weapon to kill people)

And specifically, do so without involving level of experience in using either weapon. (I.e. attacker has never held either weapon)

So, basically, you can't explain how an inanimate object suddenly becomes a transformer and instead do what you always do - deflect.

BTW, your post also clearly shows how much you're in denial and flailing desperately to try and salvage your narrative. Neither the gun, nor the knife, kill people; its the person wielding the weapon because both are inanimate objects and lack the ability to do anything on their own. Just as the hammer does not build a house, or the wrench build a car, it's the person wielding the tool which performs the act. Not the object in his hands.

 

[ll74]

So, basically, you can't explain how an inanimate object suddenly becomes a transformer and instead do what you always do - deflect.

I've never said that the object is dangerous by itself. That argument is the biggest deflection of all.

If objects aren't part of the problem then why are they used at all?

 

[Rightguide]

Somewhere I'm certain there's a place that this makes sense. It's not in a place anyone other than butterz frequents, but I'm certain that in her world this makes sense.

So much more makes sense in the Cuckoo's Nest.

 

[HisArpy]

I've never said that the object is dangerous by itself. That argument is the biggest deflection of all.

If objects aren't part of the problem then why are they used at all?

Lol, that's really rich coming from you.

Gunz are designed to be dangerous. The SCOTUS even said so (which under your vision of the world means that it's so and not debatable).

Then there's your next deflection, the answer to which is; why are any tools used for any purpose at all?

And now for the real mindbender; how does society prevent the MISUSE of said tools without impeding the unfettered legitimate use of them at the same time?

 

[ll74]

Gunz are designed to be dangerous. The SCOTUS even said so (which under your vision of the world means that it's so and not debatable).

They don't do anything
.they are inanimate objects.

 

[Rightguide]

A friend of mine who is a professional hunter recently shot himself in the leg while exterminating a sounder of more than a dozen wild boar. His use of a semi-auto mini-14 made sense in this case though he is proud to say that he could have been just as effective with a lever-action 30-30.

After spending two short magazines on the pigs he brought his holstered single-action .44 Magnum and his new puppy to inspect the carcases, when another pig he hadn't seen rushed past him. He drew and cocked his revolver but the puppy chased after the pig, running his shot, so he let the hammer down reholstered the gun, and chased the pig and the pup into a small ravine. He jumped down an embankment and stumbled and drew his hand across the hammer, planting a slug between his tibia and fibula. The shot scared the pig and the puppy was okay. He had a nice walk back to the truck.

I asked him about whether guns shoot people and he told me to fuck off.

Should have been carrying a Ruger New Model Blackhawk designed with a transfer bar ignition system and that probably wouldn't have happened.