How many threads do you take at once?

How many threads do you take at once?

  • Just one; I like to focus my efforts.

    Votes: 4 8.9%
  • Two to three; just enough to keep me occupied.

    Votes: 11 24.4%
  • Four to Seven; I like a variety of stories, characters and partners.

    Votes: 15 33.3%
  • Seven to Ten; keep them coming, I love to write and I have the time.

    Votes: 8 17.8%
  • More than Ten; Heck I have too much free time, sue me!!!

    Votes: 7 15.6%

  • Total voters
    45
Wanders through, spends some time reading those responses and comments that I can read without hitting read post. Shakes head.

An interesting conversation.
 
I'm thinking of writing another Alice post.. she's been quiet long enough that she's bound to have constructed some interesting world or another!

I support this plan.

I was thinking about shannon just yesterday.
I dont think that thread will ever really die... just morph. or should morph.
Into interconnected one-offs in the lives of the patients and staff of the asylum. rather than a flowing story.


you've never tried to avoid drama and snarky people before have you? Most newbies do this by being polite, staying out of other peoples threads till they get comfy and learning the ropes. -nods-

Ausus: fuck you
Nina: not now, i'm having an overly dramtic bitchy moment.

Two things.

First- I do think you should post. I rather would like to see where you take shannon, and I'm not sure she's as fully developed as she could be, given that she was rather quickly engulfed by a certain egomaniacal doctor.

Second.
Not fuck you.
At least not in the not fun sense of the word.
Ha! Some newbs sure. They create their own thread and lord over it. However, it's also polite to make yourself well known throughout the board, not just in one place. And finally, this would be the second time you've come to the rescue of this newbie. That means two things, either I annoy the ever shit outta you (which I'm willing to accept, cause, it's me and you wouldn't be the first. However, given that you are a general straight shooter and just put it out there, I don't think it's me). OR This one is rather special to you.

In either case, put the claws down mommacita, I'll lay off the interrogation, name calling, and general nuisance making. For a little while at least.

I know you consider this drama, but it isn't for me. This is an active cause in my life. Its fine if it isn't in yours, but this isn't me having a snit.

Also, I'll write Tessa the moment people say we should

Write Tessa.
Do I count as people?
 
I know you consider this drama, but it isn't for me. This is an active cause in my life. Its fine if it isn't in yours, but this isn't me having a snit.

Also, I'll write Tessa the moment people say we should
I dont consider the conversation or rather the topic content thereof to be dramatic in the least. And I know its not 'my' cause but being female I do have a stake in the cause, even if i can be part of the problem. and i know you're not having a snit.. that looks way way way worse!!!

Its the snide shit that people start because they arnt being heard or agreed with OR arnt listening to whats actualy being said with an OPEN friggin mind.

i want to tell you that your feelings wouldt get hurt if you didnt keep talking to closed doors but that is an asshole move. The world needs more Vail. and people like you that acutaly take the time to explain important matters in terms that people like me, that dont give a fuck usualy, can understand. How else is shit going to change if no one ever says anything.
I support this plan.



Two things.

First- I do think you should post. I rather would like to see where you take shannon, and I'm not sure she's as fully developed as she could be, given that she was rather quickly engulfed by a certain egomaniacal doctor.

Second.
Not fuck you.
At least not in the not fun sense of the word.
Ha! Some newbs sure. They create their own thread and lord over it. However, it's also polite to make yourself well known throughout the board, not just in one place. And finally, this would be the second time you've come to the rescue of this newbie. That means two things, either I annoy the ever shit outta you (which I'm willing to accept, cause, it's me and you wouldn't be the first. However, given that you are a general straight shooter and just put it out there, I don't think it's me). OR This one is rather special to you.

In either case, put the claws down mommacita, I'll lay off the interrogation, name calling, and general nuisance making. For a little while at least.

1. I will... soonish. have to get some of my other threads out of my head and it's finals week. BUT... that much stress and crazy making might be good to release there.

2. no its not you though yes you can have your annoying moments, like most people, and no its not him. I don't think ive ever talked to him before. I just really feel strongly about not attacking the person that is ignorant but shining a light on where they are being ignorant and promote change through eliciting curiosity and willingness rather than making them retreat from the conversation. possibly never to think of it in a positive light again, especially when it is a topic of this importance. It sets a bad example of what you are trying to teach.

I also dont like newbs being attacked straight off the bat. Everyone has to start in there own way and this is not the General Board.
 
For the record, I did admit that there is a major flaw in the way society views men and women. There are many, actually, on both sides of the fence.

My only point in this whole conversation is that society's rules in such things hold no bearing over how I deal with people I care about. That is between myself and them. Nobody else.

This was glossed over, however, and the fingers pointed about how easy it is to ignore things when I'm on the right side of them. So, when I say, "I agree, but there's more," I am painted as one of the culprits of aforementioned flaws.

This was my perception, at least. Feel free to correct it.
 
For the record, I did admit that there is a major flaw in the way society views men and women. There are many, actually, on both sides of the fence.

My only point in this whole conversation is that society's rules in such things hold no bearing over how I deal with people I care about. That is between myself and them. Nobody else.

This was glossed over, however, and the fingers pointed about how easy it is to ignore things when I'm on the right side of them. So, when I say, "I agree, but there's more," I am painted as one of the culprits of aforementioned flaws.

This was my perception, at least. Feel free to correct it.

Because you are talking as if things happen in a bubble and they don't. So when you call a woman a girl, and that isn't something she wants, then its a problem that concerns all women. Your "I don't care what society thinks" attitude is cute, but not particularly insightful or relevant.
 
would you two listen to eachother please..

you are talking of two DIFFRENT things

-points at her-
hes taling about just his female, just them.. whether or not anyone can hear/see them

-points at him
She's talking about the fact that just because its endearing, it is also deragatory by societies views... whether you care or not what society thinks is irrelevant.

for fuck sake you both are right.
 
Or, to put it another way...its like we were having a discussion about bullying and your addition was "I don't bully, I don't play those games"
Which isn't much of an addition, rhetoric-wise.
 
would you two listen to eachother please..

you are talking of two DIFFRENT things

-points at her-
hes taling about just his female, just them.. whether or not anyone can hear/see them

-points at him
She's talking about the fact that just because its endearing, it is also deragatory by societies views... whether you care or not what society thinks is irrelevant.

for fuck sake you both are right.

My point was that the discussion at large was about a bigger thing than just him and whatever other person.
And so, fine, but it isn't much of an addition to the conversation and doesn't warrant much time, hence the 'glossing over'
 
My point was that the discussion at large was about a bigger thing than just him and whatever other person.
And so, fine, but it isn't much of an addition to the conversation and doesn't warrant much time, hence the 'glossing over'

I know, but hes not going to hear you unless you say it like that, plainly.. not bubbles and whatnot.
 
-slips on heels, wabbly walks around blowing bubbles-

You have to because it matters to you, thats why.

Don't even get me start on the irony of having to make my language this simplistic on a site devoted to writing...

However, I am off to bed to dream of Ninaline in creepy sexy heels and bubbles
 
Don't even get me start on the irony of having to make my language this simplistic on a site devoted to writing...

However, I am off to bed to dream of Ninaline in creepy sexy heels and bubbles
-snorts- I said, plain not simplistic you silly girl!

-smirks and blows more bubbles-

They is the smesy... -blows bubbls on heels-
~especially bubbles....
-nods- they are fitting.
 
-growls-

save

sounds like you want to take my bacon from me....


you cannot have my bacon

Bacon-Weave-000281.jpg
 
Back
Top