SmokingFap
Former Stud
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2022
- Posts
- 7,876
Jesus, even your insults are lame.Lol. If only you weren't related to the wizard's scarecrow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jesus, even your insults are lame.Lol. If only you weren't related to the wizard's scarecrow.
The wizard's scarecrow is a fictional character. You do know that, don't you?Lol. If only you weren't related to the wizard's scarecrow.
Jesus, even your insults are lame.
rob is right and you're wrong.^ yet another admission of someone who comes here to talk politics but is unversed in the subject they wax so ineloquently upon.
And yet they try to blame me for them being idjits...
That is a lie.Even James Comer has admitted they don't have any actual evidence. He keeps saying "I HOPE to prove..." The so-called IRS whistleblowers, who didn't actually have whistleblower status, all admitted that they had been paid by Trump associates. And I believe two of them had been fired from the IRS "for cause" unrelated to their so-called whistleblowing, the third was suspended pending investigation. That's why that first hearing was a complete dud and nobody talks about those morons anymore. The money that Joe received from his brother was the complete, publicly DOCUMENTED repayment of a loan. Show me any documentation that proves your "10%" had one iota to do with "foreign interests". You shitheads keep making wild, borderline-retarded claims that you can't back up.
Didn’t I hear something about the case against Joe unraveling because the main witnesses were exposed as liars?
Well, to be fair, some of the witnesses have told the truth. The ones that said that Joe had nothing to do with his son's or brother's business affairs. Most of the others were paid liars or Russian operatives.Didn’t I hear something about the case against Joe unraveling because the main witnesses were exposed as liars?
Nope, just an inconvenient truth for you and your fellow MAGA zombies.That is a lie.
Nope, just an inconvenient truth for you and your fellow MAGA zombies.
Whenever Righty replies to a post he doesn't like with a short blurt instead of bloviating with bluster as he usually does, he knows he's got nothin'.Nope, just an inconvenient truth for you and your fellow MAGA zombies.
If you believe the "proof" then you would think that to be true. Since there isn't any, it is not.And more proof here that the left is okay with their guy being on the take, its only wrong for other people to be on the take.
Where’s the smoking gun? They’ve been at this long enough that if there was any there there, as they say, should be able to bring more than “he’s been investigated by everyone and nothing happens.” A smoke and mirrors investigation it seems.I believe that what you likely heard was that the FBI decided to arrest a TRUSTED confidential human source after he testified to Congress about Joe's involvement. The FBI claims that it's because he lied to them about Joe's involvement.
Isn't that a remarkable coincidence? Right after the witness fingers the head honcho, the witness is arrested by that same head honcho's goon squad.
Why aren't you wondering about witness tampering and suppression of evidence?
Maybe for some but not all. Most dems are for letting the chips fall as long as there’s actual evidence and proof.And more proof here that the left is okay with their guy being on the take, it’s only wrong for other people to be on the take.
What are you on about?Damn, you're so close to my ass, my farts must be going up your nose.
Respect the space...
^^^^^^^^^^^I believe that what you likely heard was that the FBI decided to arrest a TRUSTED confidential human source after he testified to Congress about Joe's involvement. The FBI claims that it's because he lied to them about Joe's involvement.
Isn't that a remarkable coincidence? Right after the witness fingers the head honcho, the witness is arrested by that same head honcho's goon squad.
Why aren't you wondering about witness tampering and suppression of evidence?
Yeah, you probably did. You listen to MSNBC, right? It ain't so.Didn’t I hear something about the case against Joe unraveling because the main witnesses were exposed as liars?
Bank records don't lie. Joe is a criminal.If you believe the "proof" then you would think that to be true. Since there isn't any, it is not.
Of course. Because he received a loan repayment when he was a private citizen and you dipshits believe that is the smoking gun of somethingBank records don't lie. Joe is a criminal.
Loan repayment my ass.Of course. Because he received a loan repayment when he was a private citizen and you dipshits believe that is the smoking gun of something
No, no, many of the major networks carried the story including CBS, NBC, WSJ, AP, REUTERS, FOX NEWS and others.Yeah, you probably did. You listen to MSNBC, right? It ain't so.
I doubt your ass factors in there.Loan repayment my ass.