Necrophilia

[FurryFury]

Just a thought...

A dying wife says to her still loving and adoring kinkster husband, " Honey. I have never denied you any sexual experience. I know we/you've always wondered what it would feel like to have sex with a dead person, even tho' we'ed likely never do it in RL. We both know that it's a once in a lifetime experience (pun intended) and since I love you so much and want to please you always... even in the afterlife. I want to give you this final gift...of myself ".

Wife writes in her will, giving her husband permission. Even though she is no longer a living breathing woman, she is in fact still "his" and as one final loving gesture gives him the opportunity to have sex with her dead body, should he so desire it...shrugs.

I don't have a problem with that. Flip the sexes and I still don't.

Fury

 

[Kind der Nacht]

The body could actually be preserved and disinfected for later “use”. Not quite my cup of tea but if that’s what a couple wanted to do I don’t see why it’s any of the governments business

 

[hotblooded]

well I'd hope he'd only do it once...and while I respect your notion of preservation and such, wouldn't that be carrying things a bit too far?

 

[@}-}rebecca----]

I know I am likely to get flamed for this question ......takes a deep breath......have any of you posting above EVER spent time , close time with someone you love ( or a 'body') that has died ? I don't want answers of applied science , or you walked past a relative in a coffin so you have seen it , I mean spending real time , real close (ability to feel, hear ) to someone who has died ?
I have more to add to this but I am going to wait to read replies first.

@}-}rebecca----

 

[FurryFury]

One of the most moving times in my life was after my Dad died. I rushed to the hospital to spend time with this body. Not long later I also spent time at the funeral home. He wasn't embalmed. This was right after his body arrived there.

It was moving because I felt his spirit was there still. I don't know how to explain it but this whole thing really touched me. His body almost seemed to glow, but then again he was jaundiced and I was in a state of sorts.

I am grateful for the time I did have with his body after he died. Particularly since I wasn't there right when he died.

I felt robbed when my Grandmother wouldn't let me see my Grandfather before he died and also didn't honor my request to see his body directly after he died. Two days and one state later there was nothing of "him" there in the coffin.

Is that what you mean Miss Rebecca?

Fury

 

[shy slave]

I know I am likely to get flamed for this question ......takes a deep breath......have any of you posting above EVER spent time , close time with someone you love ( or a 'body') that has died ? I don't want answers of applied science , or you walked past a relative in a coffin so you have seen it , I mean spending real time , real close (ability to feel, hear ) to someone who has died ?
I have more to add to this but I am going to wait to read replies first.

@}-}rebecca----

You won't find me flaming you for that question.

Yes I have spent time with dying people, people at the point of their death and more recently time with a person I was very close to who died unexpectedly

I find the whole concept of necrophilia sick beyond words.

 

[leeroy jenkins]

I am going the other way, not to keen on death will not ever attend another funeral because of that. This is not disrespectful as most of my old family believes, the person is dead they care not a whit about you being there. Sorry just a bit pissed at WoW and its spewing here too, but as your a nurse or health care worker I would be interested in hearing your point of view Madam Rebecca.

 

[@}-}rebecca----]

I am going the other way, not to keen on death will not ever attend another funeral because of that. This is not disrespectful as most of my old family believes, the person is dead they care not a whit about you being there. Sorry just a bit pissed at WoW and its spewing here too, but as your a nurse or health care worker I would be interested in hearing your point of view Madam Rebecca.

Thank you Leeroy though I am still reserving my final comments on this Thread until a fair amount of time has passed for the previous people whom posted to either adress or ignore my question.......smiles. Just to clarify am neither a health care worker nor a nurse though I share many of the skills of both and then some. I am rather unique and thats a statement without ego as its a fact, not self praise.

 

[leeroy jenkins]

Thank you Leeroy though I am still reserving my final comments on this Thread until a fair amount of time has passed for the previous people whom posted to either adress or ignore my question.......smiles. Just to clarify am neither a health care worker nor a nurse though I share many of the skills of both and then some. I am rather unique and thats a statement without ego as its a fact, not self praise.

Ok well I had looked for the thread about bioche being a teacher and our responses but cant find it and in there you said something about care worker so I thought you were one. Ego is good as long as its kept in check with the knowledge there is someone out there younger, smarter, and more skilled then you. Its when you think you are done learning or your the best that currently is that ego becomes a problem. Being humble might not be fun but it sure can save you many headaches and heartaches.

 

[Etoile]

Not quite my cup of tea but if that’s what a couple wanted to do I don’t see why it’s any of the governments business

This applies to a lot more than necrophilia. In parts of the United States, there are laws against adultery, anal sex, oral sex, pornography, ownership of vibrators and sex toys...there is a LONG established history of the government sticking its nose into American bedrooms.

 

[Emerald Eyed]

Having been with people who have died. Sadness took over.

I don't think I would ever be in the mood to have sex wih a dead spouse or anything

 

[O'Mac]

Not quite my cup of tea but if that’s what a couple wanted to do I don’t see why it’s any of the governments business

Again, though I consider myself fairly socially liberal, I would argue that there are instances where legislation should be passed to limit or restrict certain personal freedoms of this type. Again, I think the health hazards involved with this particular kink far outweighs the brief pleasures a person might experience. Also, as s'lara had mentioned, allowing this sort of thing could potentially open a floodgate of more destructive behaviour, perhaps.

Once again to reinforce my position:

Nercophilia - Probably not a good idea.

 

[Joe Schmoe]

I have not been with anyone that I have been intimately involved with die and if I had or were to my grief would be far too much to allow any sexual desire to emerge...ever.

 

[cati]

if a person writes it in they,re will
that they want a good fuck in the afterlife
should it be legal

I have gone back and re-read the question. It is the "deceased" who wants to include this act in their will. A different ball game entirely.
If they stated in their will, that they want a good fuck in the "afterlife" who are we to deny them...shrugs.

Which then begs the question.."is there life after death?"

Again, the initial post had to do with the legalities of the situation.

 

[cati]

But seriously folks, as flippant as my posts have been on the subject of necrophilia, it is something I would never indulge in. If i met a person who showed even the slightest interest in it I would walk away quickly, knowing that that individual was seriously "sick."

But like all threads here in Lit., I would think that this particular subject was/still is open to discussion, no matter how disagreeable or distasteful the opinions may be.

 

[High-Tied]

But seriously folks, as flippant as my posts have been on the subject of necrophilia, it is something I would never indulge in. If i met a person who showed even the slightest interest in it I would walk away quickly, knowing that that individual was seriously "sick."

But like all threads here in Lit., I would think that this particular subject was/still is open to discussion, no matter how disagreeable or distasteful the opinions may be.

Agreed, no matter how taboo the act may be considered, the discussion should be kept free. Unfortunate with many subjects, pressures from the many will stomp out any open discussion.

 

[cati]

Nods and that's understandable.

 

[rosco rathbone]

"and why is this bdsm"??

 

[Etoile]

"and why is this bdsm"??

See, and I keep tellin' people there should be a "Wacky Fetishes" section of the Lit boards...

 

[leeroy jenkins]

See, and I keep tellin' people there should be a "Wacky Fetishes" section of the Lit boards...

If you moved them to another section do you thing the flames would burn bright?? At least here most people even if they dislike something will not flame a post.

 

[Etoile]

If you moved them to another section do you thing the flames would burn bright?? At least here most people even if they dislike something will not flame a post.

1. I was being facetious.
2. People do flame things here...there was a firey thread about impregnation a couple of years ago, and there have been plenty of others.
3. Wacky fetishes aren't the same thing as BDSM. Whether the fetish is feet, tickling, balloons, furries, etc - those aren't really BDSM.
4. People often usually keep their flaming out of special interest sections. The GB and the Playground are hotbeds of flaming I'm sure, but it's really minimal in GLBT and BDSM (the two places I frequent). I've been here for a number of years and I really think those who hate certain things just don't go read those threads.
5. Why should I seek to protect people from flaming by harboring them? It diminishes their own strength to stand up to flamers.

But mostly: I was being facetious.

 

[leeroy jenkins]

1. I was being facetious.
2. People do flame things here...there was a firey thread about impregnation a couple of years ago, and there have been plenty of others.
3. Wacky fetishes aren't the same thing as BDSM. Whether the fetish is feet, tickling, balloons, furries, etc - those aren't really BDSM.
4. People often usually keep their flaming out of special interest sections. The GB and the Playground are hotbeds of flaming I'm sure, but it's really minimal in GLBT and BDSM (the two places I frequent). I've been here for a number of years and I really think those who hate certain things just don't go read those threads.
5. Why should I seek to protect people from flaming by harboring them? It diminishes their own strength to stand up to flamers.

But mostly: I was being facetious.

Etoile your using bigger words then I know, guess its time for dictionary.com to the rescue again.

I will touch on the last topic, not everyone is as strong as some and it might take years to develop that strength, good case is my real mother. She was very weak overall as a person and it was not until I was in my mid to late teens that she would show some backbone, so sometimes you might need to shealter the huddled masses like the Lady in New York says.

 

[High-Tied]

See, and I keep tellin' people there should be a "Wacky Fetishes" section of the Lit boards...

Ahhh, for the pervish lepers of Lit? You may be on to something. Of course, isn't Lit itself an island in the sea of the net as it were?

 

[lne_iii]

1. I was being facetious.
2. People do flame things here...there was a firey thread about impregnation a couple of years ago, and there have been plenty of others.
3. Wacky fetishes aren't the same thing as BDSM. Whether the fetish is feet, tickling, balloons, furries, etc - those aren't really BDSM.
4. People often usually keep their flaming out of special interest sections. The GB and the Playground are hotbeds of flaming I'm sure, but it's really minimal in GLBT and BDSM (the two places I frequent). I've been here for a number of years and I really think those who hate certain things just don't go read those threads.
5. Why should I seek to protect people from flaming by harboring them? It diminishes their own strength to stand up to flamers.

But mostly: I was being facetious.

Maybe it's just because it's a fetish I hold dear...but I think tickling can have lots of BDSM attributes to it. Control, Mercy, Testing limits...Trust...
Mmmm. Heh.

 

[ladyblaze]

lurker coming out

i haved lurked long enough .........with that said........
it is my belief that the body is but a receptacle for the soul.....the soul never ends, but goes on....it becomes free of its earthly bounds
.....as for the "leaving it in the will"......surely it would never be legal in any state......should it be???should we have that freedom????........to each there own, but what about limits>>>???......would the husband want to????........

i can recall asking my mortician friend if he asked his lady friends to take a cold shower and lie real still.........little bit of sick humour there........

as for the soul.......it goes on
http://english.literotica.com:81/stories/showstory.php?id=240389