Never say "the left" when you mean "the Democrats"

Doesn't mean they aren't doing exactly that and pushing for more all the time.
Actually it does. The Democrats have no hidden agenda. There aren't any secret Communists in America, there never were, that's 1950s Red Scare nonsense. Recall that McCarthy never was able to actually name a single crypto-Communist.
 
No, you got rekt. You provided assertions where I provided demonstrations -- you lose.
Literal projection.

Dude your bullshit wiki wasn't demonstration and it loses in the credibility department to the top universities, reference materials and the literal philosophers who came up with the ideas.

Everyone else isn't wrong, you are.
 
Literal projection.

Dude your bullshit wiki wasn't demonstration
RationalWiki is always better demonstration than any other source but Wikipedia.
and it loses in the credibility department to the top universities, reference materials and the literal philosophers who came up with the ideas.

Everyone else isn't wrong, you are.
By that token, regarding transgenderism, the psychologists aren't wrong, you are.

What makes Republicans not liberals is that they're not Team Enlightenment, they're Team Romanticism.
 
RationalWiki is always better demonstration than any other source but Wikipedia.

Both are the public toilet of references.

By that token, regarding transgenderism, the psychologists aren't wrong, you are.

Nope, because there was no recent changes to the definition of liberalism. Certainly none out of pure political correctness as there was with the DSM.
What makes Republicans not liberals is that they're not Team Enlightenment, they're Team Romanticism.

Backwards as ever, not that it would matter because "team enlightenment" is not what defines liberalism.

Literally NO REFERENCE ANYWHERE defines liberalism as "team enlightenment".
 
Certainly none out of pure political correctness as there was with the DSM.
Psychologists as a group have no commitment to either party.
Backwards as ever, not that it would matter because "team enlightenment" is not what defines liberalism.

Literally NO REFERENCE ANYWHERE defines liberalism as "team enlightenment".
It's Western history -- no enlightenment means no liberalism. Conservatism only exists in reaction to liberalism like romanticism only exists in reaction to enlightenment.
 
Psychologists as a group have no commitment to either party.

They're almost entirely all radical leftist and were one of the first to toe that woke line.
It's Western history -- no enlightenment means no liberalism.

On a timeline, sure.

It still doesn't define liberalism. Not even your porta potty wiki of a source tries to define it as such.
Conservatism only exists in reaction to liberalism like romanticism only exists in reaction to enlightenment.

Conservatism means different things in different places. In the USA it exist to conserve it's liberal founding. Protect it from the anti-American progressive lefties over in the DNC.

That also means most of what you say here is a total load of shit.
 
Both are the public toilet of references.

You have noticed, have you not, that Wikipedia is never actually wrong? Sometimes dull, but never wrong. RationalWiki is less dull and, in my experience, never wrong.
 
You have noticed, have you not, that Wikipedia is never actually wrong? Sometimes dull, but never wrong. RationalWiki is less dull and, in my experience, never wrong.

No I've been too busy looking at reputable references. :D
 
Back
Top