Post Illegal Alien Crimes Here

[TastySuckToy]

The immigrants are not.

You're such a dishonest shit. RightGuide said illegal immigration is bad, not immigrants.

You leftie loons have yet to explain why illegal immigration should be allowed when legal immigration has a system already in place.

 

[Rightguide]

The immigrants are not.

Illegal immigrants are.

 

[Rightguide]

You're such a dishonest shit. RightGuide said illegal immigration is bad, not immigrants.

You leftie loons have yet to explain why illegal immigration should be allowed when legal immigration has a system already in place.

They want to replace the American voting majority with foreign people who are more amenable to Socialism and central control. The know they can't sell that shit to real natural born Americans so Democrats decided to violate federal law and throw open the border to invasion. They should all be tried for treason.

 

[Politruk]

Illegal immigrants are.

They're not. They're just producers and consumers and taxpayers. They are of value to American society, and of considerably more value than any voting Republican.

 

[Politruk]

They want to replace the American voting majority with foreign people who are more amenable to Socialism and central control.

That's all pernicious lies when Tucker Carlson says it on Fox and it's no truer here.

 

[TastySuckToy]

They want to replace the American voting majority with foreign people who are more amenable to Socialism and central control. The know they can't sell that shit to real natural born Americans so Democrats decided to violate federal law and throw open the border to invasion. They should all be tried for treason.

That's one reason.

But another more demanding reason is money: the elites and big corperations want very cheap labour and wage suppression with an inflated work force and wage slave class, that can't appeal to the legal system because said illegals already violated it themselves.

Lefties have literally said that Americans won't clean toilets and do really cheap labour. But they dress up wanting a slave class as really being 'caring and helping the working class'.

Here's a good example of lefties slipping up and saying what they really mean:

 

[Buffalogurl]

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/15/us/laken-riley-murder-trial/index.html
Here's an update to the Laken Riley....... this sub human admitted to " hunting women"... my question is where are the femm-nazis screaming for his blood/head on a platter
Say her name politruk....

 

[ll74]

They want to replace the American voting majority with foreign people who are more amenable to Socialism and central control. The know they can't sell that shit to real natural born Americans so Democrats decided to violate federal law and throw open the border to invasion. They should all be tried for treason.

You want to circumvent the law with executive overreach.

If they step foot on American soil, they can claim asylum. Want to change that, change the law

If you wish to remove birthright citizenship, feel free to work on the Amendment needed.

 

[Rightguide]

That's one reason.

But another more demanding reason is money: the elites and big corperations want very cheap labour and wage suppression with an inflated work force and wage slave class, that can't appeal to the legal system because said illegals already violated it themselves.

Lefties have literally said that Americans won't clean toilets and do really cheap labour. But they dress up wanting a slave class as really being 'caring and helping the working class'.

Here's a good example of lefties slipping up and saying what they really mean:

I wonder how many toilets any of those entitled bints have cleaned.

 

[Politruk]

You're such a dishonest shit. RightGuide said illegal immigration is bad, not immigrants.

There is no meaningful difference.

You leftie loons have yet to explain why illegal immigration should be allowed when legal immigration has a system already in place.

It is not allowed, by definition.

Beyond that:

"Why can't they just come legally?"[edit]​

The primary means of legal immigration to the US are through familial relationships with a US citizen, employment, diversity visas, or humanitarian grounds. However, there are caps to family sponsorship (226,000) and employment (140,000) visas, and there is a maximum seven percent per country whose citizens can receive family or employment visas. Research by Congress has found that employment-based visas have waiting lists extending for 100 years.[36]

Many people present as undocumented immigrants are unable to qualify for the aforementioned means of legal immigration due to lack of family connections or skilled employment; the employment based visas are limited to high-skill professions. Additionally, asylum is not available for people migrating for economic reasons. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops argues, "The Catholic Church believes that current immigration laws must be reformed to meet our country's need for low-skilled labor and facilitate the reunification of families."[37]

 

[Philthy_Phil]

.. my question is where are the femm-nazis screaming for his blood/head on a platter

You're right here.

 

[ll74]

I wonder how many toilets any of those entitled bints have cleaned.

Lol.... seriously

 

[Rightguide]

You want to circumvent the law with executive overreach.

If they step foot on American soil, they can claim asylum. Want to change that, change the law

If you wish to remove birthright citizenship, feel free to work on the Amendment needed.

Don't need an amendment only a ruling on the language in the 14th Amendment and revisiting the Wong Kim Ark decision of 1898 and SCOYUS understanding that his parents were not illegal aliens. Get educated before you come back to argue this point with me.

 

[Politruk]

Don't need an amendment only a ruling on the language in the 14th Amendment and revisiting the Wong Kim Ark decision of 1898 and SCOYUS understanding that his parents were not illegal aliens. Get educated before you come back to argue this point with me.

Not even in its present formation will the SCOTUS end jus soli citizenship.

 

[ll74]

Don't need an amendment only a ruling on the language in the 14th Amendment and revisiting the Wong Kim Ark decision of 1898 and SCOYUS understanding that his parents were not illegal aliens. Get educated before you come back to argue this point with me.

Nope. It will take an amendment. SCOTUS already ruled on it. You think it was narrow enough of a ruling to not be valid and that's simply a bullshit online narrative.

You're not educated on that except from people who hate "anchor babies" and lie to you. Literally the only people who argue that point are people who want to end birthright citizenship and are not objective.

 

[Politruk]

and throw open the border to invasion.

Immigration is not invasion.
Type that 100 times before you post another word on this subject.

 

[Politruk]

They want to replace the American voting majority with foreign people who are more amenable to Socialism and central control.

I hope we all can agree, now, that the Immigration Act of 1924, crafted to bar out all but northern Europeans, was a national disgrace. And the reasoning behind it was that other immigrants could not internalize American republican institutions. Let us not ever again allow that kind of thinking to play a role in immigration policy.