President Trump will be re-elected in 2020 and this is why...

Dan Bishop is the projected WINNER in North Carolina.

By about a 51-49 margin in an R+12 district that the Democrats haven't won since 1950. Not exactly a promising harbinger for Trump (who carried that district by double digits in 2016).
 
YDB95 writes: "You got our number again, Dump. It's got nothing to do with his shovelling money to anti-choice campaigns..."

The Democratic Party is America's ABORTION party, YDB95 - and Planned Parenthood currently tells that party which of their candidates are to be funded and which are not! And you see nothing wrong with that?

"Even though, as JKD pointed out, he wasn't all that successful."

Trump is a BILLIONAIRE - but to modern-progressive-Democrats, HE'S not all that successful, either! Liberals prefer those people who become multi-millionaires serving in government elective office (e.g. the Clintons, Obamas, & Nancy Pelosi!)

jp55665566 writes: "Dan Bishop is the projected WINNER in North Carolina. Trump 2020

YDB95 writes: "By about a 51-49 margin in an R+12 district that the Democrats haven't won since 1950."

If the Democrats had won that seat, they'd be cheering LOUDLY - but they didn't.
 
The Democratic Party is America's ABORTION party, YDB95 - and Planned Parenthood currently tells that party which of their candidates are to be funded and which are not! And you see nothing wrong with that?

I'd have no problem with it if it were true, and certainly I wish Planned Parenthood had that much money! You see, Dump, I don't want a return to the days of back-alley abortions. Call me crazy.



"Even though, as JKD pointed out, he wasn't all that successful."

Trump is a BILLIONAIRE - but to modern-progressive-Democrats, HE'S not all that successful, either!

First of all, he's probably not a billionaire. Secondly, it's not because of his politics that we consider him "not all that successful". It's because of his very long history of failure at just about everything. He inherited a fortune from his father, and in real dollars he lost most of it. The one thing he has been genuinely good at is getting away with shafting his creditors. That's really not something to be proud of.

jp55665566 writes: "Dan Bishop is the projected WINNER in North Carolina. Trump 2020

YDB95 writes: "By about a 51-49 margin in an R+12 district that the Democrats haven't won since 1950."

If the Democrats had won that seat, they'd be cheering LOUDLY - but they didn't.

If we had won a D+12 seat by only 2% we wouldn't be cheering loudly either. We'd be scared. As the Republicans should be (and privately they probably are) now. Incidentally, if NC swings by 10% statewide next year, Trump will lose it by quite a bit. I don't see how he wins nationwide if he doesn't win NC.
 
I'd have no problem with it if it were true

Ohhh outright denial again.....like pretending there aren't any leftist advocating socialist policies in the DNC.

You see, Dump, I don't want a return to the days of back-alley abortions. Call me crazy.

Not wanting to fund PP isn't a suggestion of such.

You're crazy.

First of all, he's probably not a billionaire. Secondly, it's not because of his politics that we consider him "not all that successful".

What about his politics exactly do you think has been "not all that successful" ?
 
YDB95 writes:

"Even though, as JKD pointed out, he wasn't all that successful."

Trump is a BILLIONAIRE - but to modern-progressive-Democrats, HE'S not all that successful, either! Liberals prefer those people who become multi-millionaires serving in government elective office (e.g. the Clintons, Obamas, & Nancy Pelosi!)

Divert! Deflect! and Conspiratorial Whataboutism! It's a Dump trifecta! :nana:

Only you, Dump, could take a post about Carl Karcher and twist it into 45 and utter ridiculousness about where the wealth of the Clintons, Obamas, and Pelosis came from. :rolleyes:

Perhaps a quick review of YDB's full comment will help you with your reading comprehension issues. Once that reality sinks in, then we can work on your intellectual dishonesty problem. ;)


*sigh* You got our number again, Dump. It's got nothing to do with his shovelling money to anti-choice campaigns, or bankrolling the Briggs Initiative (a move so homophobic even Reagan opposed it), it's all about his being a successful businessman. Even though, as JKD pointed out, he wasn't all that successful. (Who the heck can go broke selling junk food to Americans anyway? That's right up there with going bankrupt with a casino...like Trump did.)

.
 
Maybe it will be Trump vs. Warren?

'Cause Biden is dirty, dirty, dirty...

Biden Tried to Buy Putin’s Support for Iraq War With Promise of Oil Money
Biden: 'Imagine, just imagine, had in fact we worked out a little deal with the Russians'

Brent Scher - SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 5:00 AM

Joe Biden sought out Russian president Vladimir Putin before the 2003 invasion of Iraq to propose a deal in which Russia would be given the oil profits from the war if they entered alongside the United States.

Biden told of his attempt at "creative diplomacy" during a July 2004 event at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. Biden, then the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was joined on stage by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright for a discussion on foreign policy in the upcoming presidential election.

One of Biden's main criticisms of former President George W. Bush during the event was his failure to unite "nations of the world in a common cause" after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Among the nations Biden had an engagement plan for was Putin's Russia.

Biden said during the event that he, along with a Republican senator he chose not to name, asked for a meeting with Putin and proposed a deal where all proceeds from seized Iraqi oil would initially go to cash-strapped Russia. Biden viewed it as an offer Putin wouldn't be able to refuse and was disappointed the Bush administration didn't consider it.

According to a Kennedy library transcript of the event, Biden said he approached Putin and asked him the following question: "What if, in fact, President Bush would agree that the first proceeds coming from Iraqi oil would pay off the roughly $12 billion owed by direct hard currency that the Russians needed?"

Say it ain't so Joe... "collusion" with Putin/Russia?
 
YDB95 writes: "You see, Dump, I don't want a return to the days of back-alley abortions. Call me crazy."

That's not crazy at all! Back-alley abortions terminated the life of a child! That's both monstrous & horrific! But even if life is taken in a big death camp like Auschwitz (or inside a clean Planned Parenthood clinic), it's STILL killing a child!

"First of all, he's probably not a billionaire."

Democrats practice the "politics of envy," which means that they want to punish the wealthy - UNLESS they are wealthy liberal-progressives (like George Soros or Tom Steyer), in which case they want to idolize them.

"If we had won a D+12 seat by only 2% we wouldn't be cheering loudly either."

The current lunacy on the left by those weird House Dems like AOC, Omar, & the others is threatening to END Nancy Pelosi's speakership in 2020, with absolutely NOTHING accomplished! Trump Derangement Syndrome is NOT a successful political agenda!

JKendallDane writes: "Divert! Deflect! and Conspiratorial Whataboutism! It's a Dump trifecta!"

This from the same guy who says he stopped supporting Republican presidential candidates after Fremont lost to Buchanan in 1856.
 
YDB95 writes: "You see, Dump, I don't want a return to the days of back-alley abortions. Call me crazy."

That's not crazy at all! Back-alley abortions terminated the life of a child! That's both monstrous & horrific! But even if life is taken in a big death camp like Auschwitz (or inside a clean Planned Parenthood clinic), it's STILL killing a child!

If you hate abortion so much, why don't you support policies that would prevent most unwanted pregnancies in the first place? Comprehensive sex education in schools, better contraception and easier access to it, counselling to provide couples with a better understanding of how it all works...guess who not only provides that, but spends 97% of their budget on it? Planned Parenthood, Dump.

"First of all, he's probably not a billionaire."

Democrats practice the "politics of envy," which means that they want to punish the wealthy - UNLESS they are wealthy liberal-progressives (like George Soros or Tom Steyer), in which case they want to idolize them.

Even if that were true, it is well-documented that Trump has a long history of claiming his wealth is much greater than it really is (just as he does with everything else about him). That's one reason why he won't release his tax returns.

"If we had won a D+12 seat by only 2% we wouldn't be cheering loudly either."

The current lunacy on the left by those weird House Dems like AOC, Omar, & the others is threatening to END Nancy Pelosi's speakership in 2020, with absolutely NOTHING accomplished!

Not if the country at large votes 10% to the left of how it voted in 2016, as NC-9 did yesterday. And I could provide a list of the many bills the House has passed that Moscow Mitch has simply refused to take action on in the Senate, but we both know you'll just go on believing what you want to believe.

JKendallDane writes: "Divert! Deflect! and Conspiratorial Whataboutism! It's a Dump trifecta!"

This from the same guy who says he stopped supporting Republican presidential candidates after Fremont lost to Buchanan in 1856.

That's not what he said, unless you interpret it in a certain very literal way. Someone who stopped supporting Republicans in the 1980s - which I believe is what JKD actually said - did indeed stop supporting them "after 1856", but everyone but you can see that's not really what he meant.
 
Originally Posted by Dumpington
JKendallDane writes: "Divert! Deflect! and Conspiratorial Whataboutism! It's a Dump trifecta!"

This from the same guy who says he stopped supporting Republican presidential candidates after Fremont lost to Buchanan in 1856.

That's not what he said, unless you interpret it in a certain very literal way. Someone who stopped supporting Republicans in the 1980s - which I believe is what JKD actually said - did indeed stop supporting them "after 1856", but everyone but you can see that's not really what he meant.

Oh, great, YDB. You've gone and used mathematical AND grammatical legerdemain that requires extra~extra hard thinking on Dump's part. Now you're going to have to explain how that "after 1856" thing works when he has a "transgendered gay Mexican seeking out an abortion that Hillary paid for via an email" meltdown trying to prove you're wrong.

GOOD JOB! :D

.
 
"transgendered gay Mexican seeking out an abortion that Hillary paid for via an email"

At least the transgendered gay Mexican won't be a "transgendered guy" (except biologically speaking, he'd have to be...)
 
At least the transgendered gay Mexican won't be a "transgendered guy" (except biologically speaking, he'd have to be...)

SNORT! That's it...add to his confusion.

One more like that and he'll be babbling about Obama using his secret time machine to go back to 1961 to plant the fake birth announcement in the Honolulu newspaper and that Joe Biden was really running the country and sold all our National Parks to the Ukraine while he was gone. :D

.
 
YDB95 writes: "If you hate abortion so much, why don't you support policies that would prevent most unwanted pregnancies in the first place?"

Human beings aren't like dogs and cats, YDB95 - we don't HAVE to have sex because our instincts demand it! And abortion is NOT a form of birth-control! It's terminating a human life! And yes, Planned Parenthood is ALL ABOUT terminating human lives!

"...it is well-documented that Trump has a long history of claiming his wealth is much greater than it really is..."

And this bothers you so much because...?

"Not if the country at large votes 10% to the left of how it voted in 2016, as NC-9 did yesterday."

North Carolina remains a red-state, and I'm fine with that! And the Republicans continue to control the U.S. Senate with an even greater majority than they had at this time last year, which I think we can both agree is good for America!

"Someone who stopped supporting Republicans in the 1980s..."

Yeah, like JKendallDane was a huge supporter of Richard Nixon... nice attempted history re-write there!

JKendallDane writes: "Oh, great, YDB. You've gone and used mathematical AND grammatical legerdemain that requires extra~extra hard thinking..."

Did you REALLY tell YDB95 that you were a HUGE defender of President Nixon during Watergate?

YDB95 writes: "At least the transgendered gay Mexican won't be a "transgendered guy""

It certainly sounds to me like he'd be right at home in today's Democratic Party if he WAS! Modern liberal-progressives LOVE the transgendered culture as much as they appreciate illegals for entering our country and supporting Democrats at elections time! (But ONLY if those transgendered guys crossing our borders illegally ALSO support Planned Parenthood!) There are Sanctuary Cities awaiting their arrival as we speak!
 
YDB said: "Someone who stopped supporting Republicans in the 1980s..."

Yeah, like JKendallDane was a huge supporter of Richard Nixon... nice attempted history re-write there!

JKendallDane writes: "Oh, great, YDB. You've gone and used mathematical AND grammatical legerdemain that requires extra~extra hard thinking..."

Did you REALLY tell YDB95 that you were a HUGE defender of President Nixon during Watergate?

Since I graduated from high school in 1974, Nixon and Watergate all went down before I could vote. But even so, I was politically involved and like the majority of Republicans at the time, supporting Nixon had become a non-issue because he'd lost most of the party many, many months before he resigned.

I guess I did show my support for him in a way at 17. I was in Washington DC for a week of my senior year attending a nationally-famous government studies program for high school and college students. Saturday was a "free day" for us to sight-see and such, but a half dozen of us decided on something more fun by celebrating that part of the Constitution that guarantees "the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

But I'm guessing you wouldn't agree that my standing in front of the White House for an hour, holding a sign that said "Honk if you think he's guilty!" was proper support from a Republican who was already planning out his first run for political office. ;)

.
 
YDB95 writes: "If you hate abortion so much, why don't you support policies that would prevent most unwanted pregnancies in the first place?"
Human beings aren't like dogs and cats, YDB95 - we don't HAVE to have sex because our instincts demand it! And abortion is NOT a form of birth-control! It's terminating a human life! And yes, Planned Parenthood is ALL ABOUT terminating human lives!

Actually, it's mostly about preventing the need for abortions in the first place. But it's ever so much easier - for someone who'll never get pregnant at least - to pretend it's reasonable to just expect people not to have sex. You were a teenager once, you know how ridiculous that is.

"...it is well-documented that Trump has a long history of claiming his wealth is much greater than it really is..."

And this bothers you so much because...?

It's probably the least objectionable thing about the man, but it is also a perfect example of his long track record for self-aggrandisement. And he is, after all, a member of the party that one impeached a president for lying about a blowjob.

(Not to mention that a lot of his supporters - including you - cite his wealth as some sort of proof that he's a brilliant businessman and thus an excellent leader, when the reality of his record shows the exact opposite.)

"Not if the country at large votes 10% to the left of how it voted in 2016, as NC-9 did yesterday."

North Carolina remains a red-state, and I'm fine with that! And the Republicans continue to control the U.S. Senate with an even greater majority than they had at this time last year, which I think we can both agree is good for America!
VERY funny. But if NC as a whole moves as far to the left as the 9th district did this week, Trump will lose it by a substantial margin.

"Someone who stopped supporting Republicans in the 1980s..."

Yeah, like JKendallDane was a huge supporter of Richard Nixon... nice attempted history re-write there!

You always could have asked him. I just said "in the 1980s" because he said he made the switch about 35 years ago.

Did you REALLY tell YDB95 that you were a HUGE defender of President Nixon during Watergate?

No one told anyone that that I'm aware of.

YDB95 writes: "At least the transgendered gay Mexican won't be a "transgendered guy""

It certainly sounds to me like he'd be right at home in today's Democratic Party if he WAS!

I certainly hope so. Exactly what is wrong with being gay, or Mexican, or transgendered?
 
JKendallDane writes: "But I'm guessing you wouldn't agree that my standing in front of the White House for an hour, holding a sign that said "Honk if you think he's guilty!" was proper support from a Republican who was already planning out his first run for political office."

Yes, Jay-Kendall - I can EASILY picture you doing that.

YDB95 writes: "You were a teenager once, you know how ridiculous that is."

Yes, I was a teenager once. And I remember the disgust I felt with the "Playboy philosophy" that implied that guys are allowed to get women pregnant with no consequences, thanks to the convenience of abortion.

"And he is, after all, a member of the party that one impeached a president for lying about a blowjob."

Except that Bill Clinton WASN'T impeached for getting a blow-job in the oval office - no, he was impeached for LYING-UNDER-OATH during a sexual harrassment investigation brought against him from during his tenure as governor of Arkansas!

"But if NC as a whole moves as far to the left as the 9th district did this week, Trump will lose it by a substantial margin."

Except that North Carolina is NOT moving left - it was "Trump Country" in 2016 and it will REMAIN Trump-country in 2020 (but by a substantially bigger margin!)

"Exactly what is wrong with being gay, or Mexican, or transgendered?"

Exactly what is wrong with being straight, white, male, or Christian? If you hold a "straight-pride parade" you're a bigot! If you celebrate being a man, you're sexist! If you celebrate your race it's perfectly okay UNLESS you're white, in which case you're a white supremacist! And many liberal-progressive Democrats nowadays frown upon openly celebrating Christian holidays (like Christmas & Easter) as somehow being insensitive to Muslims & atheists!

And Mexican people are GREAT, unless they're violating U.S. laws - and I will say the exact same thing about Canadian, British, Japanese, Russians, Chinese, & the French! As long as they're not violating our nation's laws I LOVE 'EM ALL!
 
Yes, I was a teenager once. And I remember the disgust I felt with the "Playboy philosophy" that implied that guys are allowed to get women pregnant with no consequences, thanks to the convenience of abortion.

If you're implying that that attitude only came to prominence after Roe v Wade, that's completely untrue. The "slut/stud" double standard predates Roe by decades, if not centuries.

"And he is, after all, a member of the party that one impeached a president for lying about a blowjob."

Except that Bill Clinton WASN'T impeached for getting a blow-job in the oval office - no, he was impeached for LYING-UNDER-OATH during a sexual harrassment investigation brought against him from during his tenure as governor of Arkansas!

Out of the eleven charges in the two articles of impeachment that passed, one involved Jones. The rest were about Monica.

"But if NC as a whole moves as far to the left as the 9th district did this week, Trump will lose it by a substantial margin."

Except that North Carolina is NOT moving left - it was "Trump Country" in 2016 and it will REMAIN Trump-country in 2020 (but by a substantially bigger margin!)

This week's election suggests the exact opposite of that. NC-09 moved from R+12 to R+2. Trump only carried NC as a whole by a little under 4%. You do the math - if you can.

"Exactly what is wrong with being gay, or Mexican, or transgendered?"

Exactly what is wrong with being straight, white, male, or Christian?

Since I am all of those, I say absolutely nothing. Neither do most progressives, despite your twisted view of us.

If you hold a "straight-pride parade" you're a bigot!

Not for the reasons you seem to think.

If you celebrate being a man, you're sexist!

Only if you "celebrate" it from an MRA point of view, which is pretty darned sexist.

If you celebrate your race it's perfectly okay UNLESS you're white, in which case you're a white supremacist!

Again, it's all about the way in which you celebrate it. Besides, whites are the only race who have never been oppressed in the USA. Some white ethnicities have, such as the Irish, Italians (although they weren't considered white at the time), etc., but whites as a class have never been oppressed. Besides, whether fairly or not, almost all "pro-white" language has been co-opted by racists. Call it guilt by association if you want, but it's an issue all the same.

And many liberal-progressive Democrats nowadays frown upon openly celebrating Christian holidays (like Christmas & Easter) as somehow being insensitive to Muslims & atheists!

No, we don't. What we do frown upon is celebrating them to the exclusion of other faiths, or about working anything religious directly into public policy, which is a violation of the separation of church and state.

And Mexican people are GREAT, unless they're violating U.S. laws - and I will say the exact same thing about Canadian, British, Japanese, Russians, Chinese, & the French! As long as they're not violating our nation's laws I LOVE 'EM ALL!

Unless they want to get an abortion, use a restroom of the gender they identify with, marry someone of the same gender, secure affordable health care, and on and on and on...
 
He'll win because every Democrat in the race is a pinko or someone like Joe Biden, who's a pinko just because all the other candidates are :eek:
 
Because ALL the Democratic candidates are... completely nuts? Jeez, did you see Biden lose his teeth, and claim to be Vice President? Klobuchar, Harris, and Castro stand on boxes, to appear taller? Beto- "hell yes, we're gonna take your AR-15" , "Border wall kills 1000's". Bernie old and sick. Ramos-"Greenland melting at record pace." These are the best candidates for President this country has?
 
YDB95 writes: "The "slut/stud" double standard predates Roe by decades, if not centuries."

"Roe vs. Wade" has made it so much easier for both groups ("sluts & studs") to profligate without any moral restraints.

"Out of the eleven charges in the two articles of impeachment that passed, one involved Jones. The rest were about Monica."

The Democratic Party ruled in the late 1990's that lying under oath about illicit sex was NOT an impeachable offense.

"This week's election suggests the exact opposite of that. NC-09 moved from R+12 to R+2. Trump only carried NC as a whole by a little under 4%. You do the math - if you can."

The Democrats had hoped to add another seat to their numbers in the U.S. House of Representatives, but they FAILED to do so - end of story!

"Since I am all of those, I say absolutely nothing. Neither do most progressives, despite your twisted view of us."

Is it WRONG to feel no shame in being straight, white, male, or Christian? Because the modern Democratic Party frowns on ALL of those things!

"Again, it's all about the way in which you celebrate it."

TRANSLATION: While it's perfectly okay to celebrate being black, brown, red, or yellow, you shouldn't celebrate being white because that's just racist.

"...is a violation of the separation of church and state."

Western civilization was built on Judeo-Christian values - but modern political-progressives are increasingly pro-atheist and ALSO increasingly pro-Islamic, which fully explains why today's liberal Democrats are turning their backs on those values that brought us western civilization.

"Unless they want to get an abortion, use a restroom of the gender they identify with, marry someone of the same gender, secure affordable health care, and on and on and on..."

Back in the 1930's, the people of Germany turned away from western civilization (and our putting a high value on human life), but here in the U.S. we completely REJECTED their Nazi "anti-life" philosophy (or at least MOST Americans did!)
 
YDB95 writes:

"...is a violation of the separation of church and state."

Western civilization was built on Judeo-Christian values - but modern political-progressives are increasingly pro-atheist and ALSO increasingly pro-Islamic, which fully explains why today's liberal Democrats are turning their backs on those values that brought us western civilization.

Dump, a lot of you far-righties love to toss out that "traditional Judeo-Christian values" idiom every chance you can. The problem is none of you ever define what that means.

What is "traditional" for Jewish people rarely is for most Christians. Christianity itself, because of the multitude of denominations and Biblical interpretations, has become the modern-day Tower of Babel when it comes down to "traditional." What is "traditional" for Catholics is often very different for Mormons. Lutheran "tradition" vs Episcopal "tradition." Pentecostal "tradition" vs Quaker "tradition." Both the Baptists and the Church of Christ are deeply rooted in fundamentalism, but still have many cavernous gaps in what they consider "traditional." Even the Amish and the Mennonites don't agree on "tradition."

So what do you mean exactly, when you use that "traditional Judeo-Christian" line? It might sound good but there are never any details that come with it. :confused:

.
 
Because ALL the Democratic candidates are... completely nuts? Jeez, did you see Biden lose his teeth, and claim to be Vice President? Klobuchar, Harris, and Castro stand on boxes, to appear taller? Beto- "hell yes, we're gonna take your AR-15" , "Border wall kills 1000's". Bernie old and sick. Ramos-"Greenland melting at record pace." These are the best candidates for President this country has?

If the current candidates, including trump, are the best that America has to offer then the USA is well and truly fucked. You've had near on 20 years of either dumb (George w), slippery (Obama), and crazy and dumb and slippery all combined (trump).
No country deserves that. No wonder you're fast turning into a shit hole.
From my perspective as an independent, half a world away looking at the contenders to be my leader of the free world I'd be putting my $ on mayor Pete. He strikes me as being the most sane choice of the current bunch.
 
YDB95 writes: "The "slut/stud" double standard predates Roe by decades, if not centuries."

"Roe vs. Wade" has made it so much easier for both groups ("sluts & studs") to profligate without any moral restraints.

Who are you to impose your morals on anyone else? And I repeat, if you hate abortion so much, there are ways we could greatly reduce the risk of an unwanted pregnancy in the first place - but you're just as vociferously opposed to those as you are to abortion rights.

"Out of the eleven charges in the two articles of impeachment that passed, one involved Jones. The rest were about Monica."

The Democratic Party ruled in the late 1990's that lying under oath about illicit sex was NOT an impeachable offense.

Even if it were that simple, remember, Clinton was acquitted by a Republican-controlled Senate.

"This week's election suggests the exact opposite of that. NC-09 moved from R+12 to R+2. Trump only carried NC as a whole by a little under 4%. You do the math - if you can."

The Democrats had hoped to add another seat to their numbers in the U.S. House of Representatives, but they FAILED to do so - end of story!

The Republicans almost lost a seat they've held since 1953, and if the numbers shift statewide the way they did in that district, Trump is toast in NC - end of story!

"Since I am all of those, I say absolutely nothing. Neither do most progressives, despite your twisted view of us."

Is it WRONG to feel no shame in being straight, white, male, or Christian?
Of course not.

Because the modern Democratic Party frowns on ALL of those things!

No, the crazy left does. To compare all Democrats to them would be like comparing all Republicans to you. And that would be deeply unfair to most Republicans!

"Again, it's all about the way in which you celebrate it."

TRANSLATION: While it's perfectly okay to celebrate being black, brown, red, or yellow, you shouldn't celebrate being white because that's just racist.
I repeat, it's not an issue of celebrating, it's the way you celebrate it. Whether fairly or not, most "pro-white" language has been co-opted by racists. I guess it's up to you whether or not you're willing to sound like them (but then again, in my opinion you already to).

Besides that, there is a fundamental difference: whites are the only ethnicity you listed there who weren't traditionally treated as inferior. The fact of that past abuse and unfairness is why pride parades and the like exist today. (Same goes for gay pride - rather than whining about the lack of a straight pride parade, you ought to thank your lucky stars you don't need one.)

"...is a violation of the separation of church and state."

Western civilization was built on Judeo-Christian values - but modern political-progressives are increasingly pro-atheist and ALSO increasingly pro-Islamic, which fully explains why today's liberal Democrats are turning their backs on those values that brought us western civilization.

Feel free to show me where Christ said to deny health care to the poor, or to tear families apart because one member thereof may have crossed a border illegally, or to hate anyone who doesn't share your faith.

"Unless they want to get an abortion, use a restroom of the gender they identify with, marry someone of the same gender, secure affordable health care, and on and on and on..."

Back in the 1930's, the people of Germany turned away from western civilization (and our putting a high value on human life), but here in the U.S. we completely REJECTED their Nazi "anti-life" philosophy (or at least MOST Americans did!)

Actually, Dump, the way Trump is treating transsexuals and immigrants is a whole lot like the way Hitler treated not only the Jews, but also gays and ethnic minorities prior to the Final Solution. I know you're not willing to hear it, but he didn't just start slaughtering them outright. There was a long buildup to the point where his followers were willing to tolerate that. And it started with dehumanising language and stirring up public disgust with them. Exactly as Trump has been doing.
 
JKendallDane writes: "What is "traditional" for Jewish people rarely is for most Christians."

Half of the Christian Bible (e.g. the entire Old Testament) is Jewish. America is a Judeo-Christian nation.

magicalmoments writes: "No country deserves that. No wonder you're fast turning into a shit hole."

"Turning into a shit hole?" That's complete NONSENSE - when millions of people from all over the planet are trying to move into your country, both legally AND illegally, you're NOT a sh*thole! Unless, of course, you're talking about those cities run into the ground by Democrats (e.g. Baltimore, Detroit, etc.)

YDB95 writes: "...if you hate abortion so much, there are ways we could greatly reduce the risk of an unwanted pregnancy in the first place..."

We have laws in this country against the taking of human life. Planned Parenthood is the closest thing we have in this country to Nazi death camps!

"Clinton was acquitted by a Republican-controlled Senate."

And your point is...?

"The Republicans almost lost a seat..."

And Hillary ALMOST won the presidency in 2016, right?

"No, the crazy left does. To compare all Democrats to them would be like comparing all Republicans to you. And that would be deeply unfair to most Republicans!"

Seriously? You're now going to belittle me by telling me that I'm NOT a Republican?

"...whites are the only ethnicity you listed there who weren't traditionally treated as inferior."

And THAT'S why white people need to be punished by the Democratic Party? I can understand better now why Democrats are doing so poorly with white voters!

"Feel free to show me where Christ said to deny health care to the poor..."

If Jesus had embraced socialism then the modern Democratic Party wouldn't be so increasingly anti-Christian & pro-atheist with each new year!

"Actually, Dump, the way Trump is treating transsexuals and immigrants is a whole lot like the way Hitler treated not only the Jews, but also gays and ethnic minorities..."

And HOW MANY transsexuals & immigrants has Trump had murdered in death camps since becoming president? Now compare that number with how many unborn babies have been murdered by Planned Parenthood in their clinics since January of 2017! The difference is staggering!
 
Dump said:
KendallDane writes: "What is "traditional" for Jewish people rarely is for most Christians."

Half of the Christian Bible (e.g. the entire Old Testament) is Jewish. America is a Judeo-Christian nation.

That's your answer, Dump? Seriously? That's your entire answer to my question of what constitutes the "traditional Judeo-Christian values" we all need to be following? Just: "the Bible"? :confused: ?

But, okay. Let's just ignore that most Christians understand the OT is history and prophecy, not law, and roll with that idea. I guess with the hard part out of the way, all we need to do now is decide which translation shall be the "official" one and pick who gets to be the sole interpreter of each individual passage starting with "In the beginning..." all the way through to "The grace of the Lord Jesus be with God’s people. Amen." Only one approved version that's explained to all of us by only one authorized person. Yes! I am starting to SEE it coming together perfectly! :)

Oh, but wait! :eek: Didn't we have a major dust-up with the former landlords over this very thing a couple hundred years or so ago? You know...that one Book, one Church, and one spokesman for everything as appointed and dictated to by the King scam they had running.

Then there's that pesky First Amendment thingy and all, too. And what about those heathen atheists and infidel Muslims we've let invade our shores? And what do we do with the Indians we tried to de-savage-ize from their whole crazy "Great Spirit-Mother Earth-Commune with Nature" nonsense? Um, maybe this needs just a little more thinking?

Now, Dump, snark-mode /off/ and back to the original question: What are these mysterious "traditional Judeo-Christian values" you righties claim the country was founded on and keep demanding we return to? Specifics please.

.
 
Back
Top