graceanne
iteroticalay urugay
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2004
- Posts
- 27,579
Did you like the book overall or not?
I felt extremely conflicted by it. There were parts of it that were "hot" but I never felt so cross feminist as when reading this book. This is a position I feel unfamiliar with.
Do you feel it portrays BDSM in a real way, a positive way and/or your way?
I felt ( stripped to the bones) it was quite a realistic portrayal of lots of disfunctional relationships. I do not think it was a positive of BDSM. I found Julian essentially a weak personality for all his written strengths and methods of control....his needs and reliance on extremes to me were ... Unmasterful. A problem with the 'rich' scenario is that the captivation of self over all else is lost.
Did you like the sex scenes in the book?
Yes.
Did you like the rest of the book, the story in it?
Hmm. Difficult. It provoked reaction in me, which is good. But....I think it was a story of how not to love and think really.
Would you be interested in reading another book by this author?
I would, but it didn't rush to read the sequel. I was really very cross at times trying to work out my emotions about this book.
What did you like best about this selection?
The sex
What did you like the least?
I don't know.
How would you have changed the story?
Hmm. I would have felt better had she not had 'but we were different' reaction about Stockholm syndrome, or had he not come prepared when he came to get her at the end. I don't know. Maybe for me it was important to have a good negative reaction to this. It had me very strongly questioning my pyl feelings, as my reaction was elastic banding me into territory so extreme the otherway, which is odd as non con is not no go for me, at ALL .
I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it as much as I did! However, as I said before, I don't normally like this sort of story, so I was pretty surprised I liked it as much as I did - and I'm still not sure why. While I'll read some non-con, I prefer a bit closer to reluctance.