The *squick* thread

I'm a tactile girl, it doesn't even have to be fisting.
Getting my hand in a hole is as good as fucking, I can't imagine having a dick to even be worth all the trouble on top of that. No girl will never "oops" me because I had my fingers in her. Nothing will ever hit me in the nuts. And yet the fingers have all kinds of fantastic voyages.
 
Netzach said:
I'm a tactile girl, it doesn't even have to be fisting.
Getting my hand in a hole is as good as fucking, I can't imagine having a dick to even be worth all the trouble on top of that. No girl will never "oops" me because I had my fingers in her. Nothing will ever hit me in the nuts. And yet the fingers have all kinds of fantastic voyages.

Sorry babe, but you have nooooooooooooooo idea. :p
 
My squicks (great word btw!) so far are scat, urine, bestiality, necrophillia, incest, minors....

Im sure I have more, I just havent found them yet....

Blood, knives and breath play are not squicks for me but Im reticent to tackle the subjects publicly because of the safety issues in this kind of play. I will answer questions privately however...
 
The "bestiality, necrophillia, incest, minors" squcks always intrigue me. I don't consider them to be on the "squicks" list, because they are so far off the table, it isn't even funny. But beyond them being off the map, animals, dead people, family members, and children can not give full consent to participating in whatever it is that is going on.

I save my "squicks" list for things that I feel terribly squeamish about, but might *might* consider at some point.
 
I've been using the word squicked for years and never seen it with those asterisks before...it makes a sound in my head when I read that, sort of a slurpy popping sound...*squick*!

As for actual squicking...I don't consider edge play or limits to necessarily involve squicking. For me, things can be edgy without being squicky...edge play is more about my fears and squick is more about the gross-out thing. For me at least.

So for me, edge play includes shaving, isolation, bloodplay, knives, play piercing, etc. Stuff that squicks me includes serious scat, female catheters/sounding, rainbow showers (euuugh), and necrophilia. And then there's the naughty stuff that can be good fantasy material but I wouldn't want to experience IRL - animals, incest, etc. That kind of stuff is firmly relegated to fantasyland, but it doesn't quite squick me exactly.
 
I guess it comes down to our deifintion of 'squicks'.

The squicks I listed are hard limits, things I wont even consider.

Soft limits...(squicks that ick me out but I might consider them eventually)... any kind of rape role play that involves me 'fighting back' etc - while the fantasy gets me wet, the actual role play is too real and freaks me out, receiving oral during my period, anal fisting....
 
Etoile said:
I've been using the word squicked for years and never seen it with those asterisks before...it makes a sound in my head when I read that, sort of a slurpy popping sound...*squick*!

As for actual squicking...I don't consider edge play or limits to necessarily involve squicking. For me, things can be edgy without being squicky...edge play is more about my fears and squick is more about the gross-out thing. For me at least.

So for me, edge play includes shaving, isolation, bloodplay, knives, play piercing, etc. Stuff that squicks me includes serious scat, female catheters/sounding, rainbow showers (euuugh), and necrophilia. And then there's the naughty stuff that can be good fantasy material but I wouldn't want to experience IRL - animals, incest, etc. That kind of stuff is firmly relegated to fantasyland, but it doesn't quite squick me exactly.


Oooh yeah yeah the vomit thing

for some reason that particular efflugium -- ech. More than others.
 
I think the only thing that can really get me is maggots. I had to clean maggots out of my father's legs once and that traumatized me. I took one of my dogs to the vet once becasue she had a large boil that had started to bleed, and they told me she had maggots. They fixed her up and everything but when i found that out i started crying hysterically. I can NOT handle maggots. If you know i do not like maggots and you bring one near me your life is forefit.

there's things that done even register on my radar. Pdophilia, incest, bestiality, scat... they re things that don't even make me EW becasue they are not something i even think of in context to me. You EW becasue you imagine yourself in a situation with them. I can't do that. It won't happen. period.

I did some sounding. yes, female sounding. Ooo Ahhh... I've always had a "well what can i do with this" approach to my body. There's one more hole and damnit i feel like exploring it. I've also inserted some small sizes into my cervex. Though really, i just wouldn't suggest that. I was curious, it gave no sexual pleasure except that idea of doing something forbidden, and you can cause unhappy infections and stuff by doing that. You know sounds are most commonly used on the cervex in the medical feild.
Sounding = intense but awesome. I've gotten off a few times while doing such things... Granted i have to be more careful and it requires a little more effort (whoo cleanleness) sometimes it's fun.

Another thing i dislike is when people relate my suspensions to sexual things. I do suspensions not rope stype but with hooks, and i do them for ME, as personal growth things, not as someone elses twisted sexual fantasy.

I would not let someone perminantly mark me. I have large designs already planned out for my skin and they don't include someone else's markings. That also coincides with non sterile practices. That whole "master perminantly piercing me" thing isn't for me.
 
ammre said:
I did some sounding. yes, female sounding. Ooo Ahhh... I've always had a "well what can i do with this" approach to my body. There's one more hole and damnit i feel like exploring it. I've also inserted some small sizes into my cervex. Though really, i just wouldn't suggest that. I was curious, it gave no sexual pleasure except that idea of doing something forbidden, and you can cause unhappy infections and stuff by doing that. You know sounds are most commonly used on the cervex in the medical feild.
Sounding = intense but awesome. I've gotten off a few times while doing such things... Granted i have to be more careful and it requires a little more effort (whoo cleanleness) sometimes it's fun.
I stuck a q-tip into my urethra exactly once, for the same "it's a hole, let's stick something in it" reason. That was a baaaad experience. And yet I am absolutely fascinated by Amazing Ty, to the point where I'd almost like to buy a membership. But for myself, I am way too prone to UTI's as it is, so I won't be going up there again.
 
oh hun... q-tip is a bad plan. Soft, fuzzy, moisture absorbing, germy absorbing porusness...
i mean look at sounds, smooth, non porus easialy lubricated and easially cleaned... Before i got my hands on some of those i used carefully selected crochet hooks (the non hook end).
Clean well before hand, don't be too dirty during, and take a good pee after and you *should* be ok...
 
CutieMouse:
"The "bestiality, necrophillia, incest, minors" squcks always intrigue me. I don't consider them to be on the "squicks" list, because they are so far off the table, it isn't even funny. But beyond them being off the map, animals, dead people, family members, and children can not give full consent to participating in whatever it is that is going on."

I don't understand this objection to bestiality.

I mean, it's cool to drive a bolt into a cow's head, hoist it by its back legs, slit its throat, carve it into pieces, cook it, and serve it with A1 but fucking it is wrong cause a cow can't consent.

Pardon me while I WTF.
 
WTF all you want, I think cow snatch is not something I want to get with. Personally.
 
Never said:
CutieMouse:
"The "bestiality, necrophillia, incest, minors" squcks always intrigue me. I don't consider them to be on the "squicks" list, because they are so far off the table, it isn't even funny. But beyond them being off the map, animals, dead people, family members, and children can not give full consent to participating in whatever it is that is going on."

I don't understand this objection to bestiality.

I mean, it's cool to drive a bolt into a cow's head, hoist it by its back legs, slit its throat, carve it into pieces, cook it, and serve it with A1 but fucking it is wrong cause a cow can't consent.

Pardon me while I WTF.


LOL, so true.

Catalina :rose:
 
Dairy is kind of a fucked up thing come to think of it, who the hell thought THAT one up?
 
Quint said:
But it conforms (sorry, all) to the current societal double-standard on "inappropriate material." Kids are visually subjected to pain, death, tragedy and trauma all day long on TV, but show them sex and the alarms go off. It's never seemed right in that situation and the anti-bestiality arguments have never seemed right to me in the exact same way.

Maybe if we were eating it while we were fucking it? No, that gets into necro and even I'm not about to defend that one. ;)


Personally I have no major issues around a more open sexual atmosphere, and other cultures define the end of childhood quite differently than this one. There is a difference between frank sexuality and sexual discussions and fucking prepubescent people - unfortunately a lot of people don't see a difference.

I'm fairly pleased that I know I can get a dog from a shelter and the people working there have probably not been rogering it all day long. I hope not anyhow. I don't think it's something I really would care to watch at any point. Sure, it's a hang up if you want to call it that, but that's the whole point of this thread.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes I wonder if animal fucking will be very common in the future.

Whatever argument you make against beastiality, consent is hardly a good place to start. Then again, don't you need a license to slaughter animals? I mean, I couldn't just kill and eat my dog.

Maybe they will start passing out licenses to fuck animals. Government agents will come and visit beastial bordellos to make sure the animals aren't being forced to do anything inhumane, like ass-to-mouth.
 
Never: Sometimes squicky-ness isn't so much about right and wrong as it is about gut reactions to things.

Is it wrong to kill an animal that cannot consent to it's death? Perhaps, depending on your personal beliefs. Is it wrong to rape an animal that can't consent to such? Again, perhaps, depending on your beliefs.

However, squicky-ness is a whole 'nother issue.

For example, having sex with an animal may be considered wrong.

YET, I find it squicky to think about a man raping a female animal but not at all squicky to think of a woman having sex with a male animal.

Both may be "wrong" but only one scenario triggers my squick factor.

Another example: Take incest. Think of a brother and sister having sex squicks me, but thinking of two sisters having sex does NOT squick me. Both may be "wrong" but only one bothers me.
 
Marquis said:
Sometimes I wonder if animal fucking will be very common in the future.

Whatever argument you make against beastiality, consent is hardly a good place to start. Then again, don't you need a license to slaughter animals? I mean, I couldn't just kill and eat my dog.

Maybe they will start passing out licenses to fuck animals. Government agents will come and visit beastial bordellos to make sure the animals aren't being forced to do anything inhumane, like ass-to-mouth.

"Fido really wants me" seems kind of a stretch.
 
GeekySub said:
YET, I find it squicky to think about a man raping a female animal but not at all squicky to think of a woman having sex with a male animal.

Interesting.

Most beastiality I've come across has been human female/beat male. I wonder why this is?

And I wonder who the primary audience is, males or females?
 
Back
Top