trump's transition team compiling list of personae non grata... says no-one tied to project 2025

Trump's problem will be finding a persona grata list. Are there sufficient criminals willing to serve him?
they'll always find the crims... just don't expect them to know what the fuck they're doing in the jobs they'll find themselves in (just like before)
 
"In politics, you don't vote for a candidate that you "like". Politicians are, by design, not likeable: propagandists & partisans not judges, never acting against their self interest, hence never trustworthy.You vote for the candidate who will cause the smallest amount of harm." --Nassim Nicholas Taleb
who is the least harmful between kamala's handlers and trump?atleast with trump,u know whom u r dealing with
https://x.com/nntaleb
 
It should terrify anyone who loves democracy. Do you think YOU'D have any rights left after Trump took office? That crowd really hates women, you know?
It's a good thing then that America was never founded to be a democracy, isn't it.
 
It's a good thing then that America was never founded to be a democracy, isn't it.
One occasionally hears the phrase, "The United States is a republic, not a democracy." What this means -- when it means anything at all -- is, "The U.S. is a federal state, not a unitary state."

That is a non-sequitur. Republican government has nothing whatsoever to do with federal/decentralized government. There is no connection between the two, none at all.

France has a unitary system of government. Germany has a federal system. France is just as good a republic.

The U.S. is a democratic republic. As opposed to an aristocratic republic, like the old Republic of Venice, where only the nobility of the Golden Book could vote.
 
(((I think that's a dye job.))) :)
If true than this proves he is a fake and Russian whores probably did piss on him in Mosco. Or at least that is the type of logic presented on intellectual programs like, "The View." :mad:
 
If true than this proves he is a fake and Russian whores probably did piss on him in Mosco. Or at least that is the type of logic presented on intellectual programs like, "The View." :mad:
I believe the pee tape story -- but not that Trump has that fetish -- if he did, we would have heard about that from Stormy Daniels. No, Trump just wanted to defile a bed Obama had slept in, enough to pay Russian prostitutes to do it. He really is that petty and vindictive.

At this point national pride compels me to mention: A Russian prostitute could suck the chrome off a trailer hitch. But only an American prostitute could make it spurt mercury!
 
I believe the pee tape story -- but not that Trump has that fetish -- if he did, we would have heard about that from Stormy Daniels. No, Trump just wanted to defile a bed Obama had slept in, enough to pay Russian prostitutes to do it. He really is that petty and vindictive.

At this point national pride compels me to mention: A Russian prostitute could suck the chrome off a trailer hitch. But only an American prostitute could make it spurt mercury!
I have to give you credit for that one. Very funny. Once in a while there will be a comment that strikes me funny enough to show my husband and this one reached that bar. "Suck the chrome off a trailer hitch". Love it.
 
One occasionally hears the phrase, "The United States is a republic, not a democracy." What this means -- when it means anything at all -- is, "The U.S. is a federal state, not a unitary state."

That is a non-sequitur. Republican government has nothing whatsoever to do with federal/decentralized government. There is no connection between the two, none at all.

France has a unitary system of government. Germany has a federal system. France is just as good a republic.

The U.S. is a democratic republic. As opposed to an aristocratic republic, like the old Republic of Venice, where only the nobility of the Golden Book could vote.
The founders openly expressed distain for democracy, calling it mobocracy, and considered it one of the most dangerous forms of government: government by the tyranny of a fickle majority. It was outright rejected. Check and mate.
 
The founders openly expressed distain for democracy, calling it mobocracy, and considered it one of the most dangerous forms of government: government by the tyranny of a fickle majority. It was outright rejected. Check and mate.
Well they were right back then. The common citizenry was uneducated rabble who would just as soon cover you in hot tar and dump feathers on you than listen to opposing viewpoints.
 
Back
Top