rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,430
Reading this in Paul Krugman's blog made me think:
So people produced goods and services in exchange not for anything real or tangible, but merely for debt, which is to say a claim on the future earning stream of the debtor.
Meanwhile, the economy was chugging along merrily-propelled by nothing more than the propensity of humans for gaining power over others. (debt).
The whole thing is sustained by nothing more than ape psychology.
We really did produce all the goods and services counted in GDP; we were able to do that because we had willing workers, a sufficient capital stock, the right technology, and so on.
What is true is that some of the spending that created demand for those goods and services was debt-financed, and those debtors can’t continue to spend the way they did. But that doesn’t say that the capacity has somehow ceased to exist; it only says that if we want to keep the capacity in use, someone else has to spend instead. In other words, past growth wasn’t an illusion, or a fraud; but we need policies to sustain aggregate demand.
So people produced goods and services in exchange not for anything real or tangible, but merely for debt, which is to say a claim on the future earning stream of the debtor.
Meanwhile, the economy was chugging along merrily-propelled by nothing more than the propensity of humans for gaining power over others. (debt).
The whole thing is sustained by nothing more than ape psychology.
Last edited: