Underage Sexual "activity" what...

they'll be very amused to hear you call them my alts. way to show you're above it all.
 
Not man enough to do your dirty job by yourself, huh?:rolleyes: Am I that scary that you had to bring your friends/alts to do it for you.

Oooh I'm scared, the big manly man is calling me names:rolleyes:

I'm not an alt, chickenshit.
 
Calling people names

It's sad that LC had to respond in some of the ways she did.

1. being new to the board I didn't notice she was a mod. However I don't smoke, so anyone else with the habit can have the cigar.

2. I thought I started a serious discussion, which has raised a few pertinent points -

a) writers posts are "mangled" - viz somewhere.com in 'pointless' advice (I wonder if that's edited out yet - can't be bothered to check.

b) links in other posts apparently exist.

c) it seems that PMs are NOT private from one of LC's comments

d) the world Lit. seems to be living in is not our world - unless of course its based in a mid eastern country beyond the veil - not known of anyone in 2009 sent to prison for posting stories on "kissing"

e) LC says she has two kids - is that terrible "S" word mentioned in their household, does she vet all TV, CDs DVDs videos . . . and will the kids end up as screwed up as some TV religious guru who has his hand in his pants pocket playing ping-pong most of the time, and at others his D..... in someone else?

I'm leaving this subject here, because - until Sensuality chapter four gets approval - there's no rationality in what LC posts or Lits attitude to UAS.
 
Last edited:
It's sad that LC had to respond in some of the ways she did.

1. being new to the board I didn't notice she was a mod. However I don't smoke, so anyone else with the habit can have the cigar.

2. I thought I started a serious discussion, which has raised a few pertinent points -

a) writers posts are "mangled" - viz somewhere.com in 'pointless' advice (I wonder if that's edited out yet - can't be bothered to check.

b) links in other posts apparently exist.

c) it seems that PMs are NOT private from one of LC's comments

d) the world Lit. seems to be living in is not our world - unless of course its based in a mid eastern country beyond the veil - not known of anyone in 2009 sent to prison for posting stories on "kissing"

e) LC says she has two kids - is that terrible "S" word mentioned in their household, does she vet all TV, CDs DVDs videos . . . and will the kids end up as screwed up as some TV religious guru who has his hand in his pants pocket playing ping-pong most of the time, and at others his D..... in someone else?

I'm leaving this subject here, because - until Sensuality chapter four gets approval - there's no rationality in what LC posts or Lits attitude to UAS.


There are two separate issues here, really. The under-age sex thing is just a firm Web site policy that most erotica Web sites make--and that all Web sites have a right to make if they wish. These are privately owned companies--you are permitted to play in this sandbox at the sufferance of the owners of the Web site. The decision to try to keep under 18 material off here is a sensible legal scrutiny issue that the Web site has every right to make--and that most do make. You don't have a "right" to post any stories here, just a privilege.

The other issue is the censoring of URLs. As you and others have noted here, the posting of URLs is done (without being censored) all over this forum and was done originally on this thread as a matter of information to help a writer to get to another story site since what they wanted to write isn't accommodated here. The Web site should be pleased that the poster was being redirected--and there's no reason to think the actual owners of the Web site have any problem with this. Lady C., the usually absent moderator of this section of the forum, does go outside of the bounds of the rules of the forum herself for personal agenda (although I doubt there was a personal agenda here--I think she's just defending a faulty decision). And, yes, she can be about the rudest and most combative person to post in this area of the forum. Not really what a moderator should be at all.

When she has contravened the rules to erase my postings here (not for some time), I just restore them--and eventually she realizes that she's acting alone and on a personal agenda and gives up and leaves them there. (Chances are I'll have to restore this one.)
 
Last edited:
You forgot Japan, unless they changed it again age of consent in Japan is 12 still. :eek:
The Article 177 of the [Japanese] Penal Code puts the age of consent for sexual actitvity at
thirteen (13) years (according to Interpol's current advice to police forces). I would post their site reference, but perhaps not in this thread.

... it was a helpful link posted to solve someones problem ...
The custom on here is to send such help via PM.

Thanks, Mich. My friends call me C, my writers LadyC and my enemies, TheBitch:D, pick and choose the one you want.:rose:
Didn't anyone tell you that in the UK you are known by your enemies as that woman? <wink>

...
d) the world Lit. seems to be living in is not our world
...
... there's no rationality in ... Lits attitude to UAS.
Precisely. It's like any other virtual reality; if its rules are not acceptable, don't join. It isn't a democracy where you can join and then hope to use your influence as a member to change the rules.


Now, please everybody, CALM DOWN.
 
Help by PM

snoopercharmbrights Literotica Guru

Quote:
Originally Posted by pointless
... it was a helpful link posted to solve someones problem ...

The custom on here is to send such help via PM.

Am I imaginging things, or did I see in one of LC's posts that she might/would censor PMs that point to another site?

| - Free Speech, No Spam! - |

Woops, that's on the UCP begorrah!

btw: Sensuality Chapter 04 is at last approved!
 
Last edited:
snoopercharmbrights Literotica Guru

Quote:
Originally Posted by pointless
... it was a helpful link posted to solve someones problem ...

The custom on here is to send such help via PM.

Am I imaginging things, or did I see in one of LC's posts that she might/would censor PMs that point to another site?

Ummm ... think she's not reading our PMs.
 
snoopercharmbrights Literotica Guru

Quote:
Originally Posted by pointless
... it was a helpful link posted to solve someones problem ...

The custom on here is to send such help via PM.

Am I imaginging things, or did I see in one of LC's posts that she might/would censor PMs that point to another site?

| - Free Speech, No Spam! - |

Woops, that's on the UCP begorrah!

btw: Sensuality Chapter 04 is at last approved!


No, you aren't imagining it. LC posted that in big red font in #30 posting here. Just blowing smoke, though, I think.
 
I looked at this thread to perhaps help but couldn't help

noticing: name-calling, sniping, quote and retort, simmering passions, all of the nasty, endearing elements of AH without the usual suspects! Not sure if this is helpful for the original question...but lotsa fun, nevertheless......................
 
snoopercharmbrights Literotica Guru

Quote:
Originally Posted by pointless
... it was a helpful link posted to solve someones problem ...

The custom on here is to send such help via PM.


Am I imaginging things, or did I see in one of LC's posts that she might/would censor PMs that point to another site?

| - Free Speech, No Spam! - |

Woops, that's on the UCP begorrah!

btw: Sensuality Chapter 04 is at last approved!

You are taking your dreams for reality, dear.:rolleyes: Even if I wanted I couldn't censure PMs as I don't have access to them.

Ummm ... think she's not reading our PMs.

I don't have access to PMs

No, you aren't imagining it. LC posted that in big red font in #30 posting here. Just blowing smoke, though, I think.

Learn how to read, will you. What I posted, even if it's quoted really, is Lit's Guidelines, not mine. You should take a look at it sometimes.
 
The Article 177 of the [Japanese] Penal Code puts the age of consent for sexual actitvity at
thirteen (13) years (according to Interpol's current advice to police forces). I would post their site reference, but perhaps not in this thread.

The custom on here is to send such help via PM.

Didn't anyone tell you that in the UK you are known by your enemies as that woman? <wink>

Precisely. It's like any other virtual reality; if its rules are not acceptable, don't join. It isn't a democracy where you can join and then hope to use your influence as a member to change the rules.


Now, please everybody, CALM DOWN.

the custom on where, newbie?
 
You are taking your dreams for reality, dear.:rolleyes: Even if I wanted I couldn't censure PMs as I don't have access to them.



I don't have access to PMs



Learn how to read, will you. What I posted, even if it's quoted really, is Lit's Guidelines, not mine. You should take a look at it sometimes.


It's still blowing smoke to claim the PMs are monitored (which you did in big red lettering on post #30).

As I've said before, Lady C. threads go south like this one has because you have no concept whatsoever of how to be a good forum moderator. You are the most combatitive and nasty of the lot.
 
the custom on where, newbie?

Snooper isn't a newbie--had to change signin names somewhere back. He's Lady C's British backup singer--the one who continually tries to apply British style in answering editorial questions here from writers writing to the American market--and then getting snitty when it's noted that the two markets handle that issue separately.

Both he and Lady C will be protective of "custom" on this particular forum, as they believe they set custom and own the forum (which does help to explain why it's usually so dead in here--all the air has been sucked out of the place).
 
Last edited:
Literotica allows the passing of URLs in PMs, so if I want to point someone to a different site, I send them a PM.

Not exactly. I used to be Charm_Brights and left the board in December 2002 (see #19 in http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=118962), returning six months later as Snooper. When I wrecked that account I became Snoopercharmbrights.

actually, if you read the rules and interpret them as lady does they obviously don't allow that. of course, what's her face is interpreting the rules wrong and that rule is about spam and posting links to other sites in threads or in PMs is allowed and i have never been censored for doing so until i posted on the forum she mods. funny, aint it?
 
Lady ?

actually, if you read the rules and interpret them as lady does they obviously don't allow that. of course, what's her face is interpreting the rules wrong and that rule is about spam and posting links to other sites in threads or in PMs is allowed and i have never been censored for doing so until i posted on the forum she mods. funny, aint it?

Guess the lady must be a title only, not based on character.

If she wears briefs/knickers/panties she must go throygh a heap - unless of course the's a girl scout and familiar with undoing knots!

Maybe I'd best visit a few other forums and check out the Mods
 
Omg!!!!

We won that one! And a couple of others if anyone's counting! But as Patton said:
"The United States of America and England: Two countries separated by a common language!"
Come on?!!! We all need to get along and thrive! We have more interests in common than in opposition. If we yokels over here can get past our history of oppression and racial hatred to elect a man who is half-black, then we all should be able to come together, if only in the figurative sense.....
Well, if Lady C is really a lady (and likes men!) then it might be in the biblical realm, too, but for now and with someone I really don't know - all of my uptight, catholic upbringing comes into play.....
CALM DOWN, Y'ALL - as we say out on the high lonesome prairie......
 
You are taking your dreams for reality, dear.:rolleyes: Even if I wanted I couldn't censure PMs as I don't have access to them.



I don't have access to PMs



Learn how to read, will you. What I posted, even if it's quoted really, is Lit's Guidelines, not mine. You should take a look at it sometimes.

Hey LadyC ...

Does that mean the PM I sent you won't go through?

I have moved on with my life; I don't have any girlfriends but I do have female friends. And you are one of the best of them. :kiss:

Sorry, husband, I promise it's a smooch on the cheek.
 
To "pointless" and "Alt":

There is a proper place for childishness such as that displayed in the last three postings. It is here. Most of the rest of us prefer to use this forum for discussions of editing topics.
 
Back
Top