Wat_Tyler
Allah's Favorite
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2004
- Posts
- 59,123
Too many just don't get it.
Don't "get" much of anything at all.
This woman has more bigger balls than the Lit libturds we have here:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too many just don't get it.
It's Saturday.^^^Very good question.
Lit has an ignore function if you do not want to read my observations of your own statements about being a terrorist, and also your statements about having sex in public parks and streets to satisfy your self-admitted exhibitionism.
And if you don't want people to comment on your behaviors, don't post about them on a public forum. Exhibitionism in the public sphere may have consequences.
I have regrets over straying away from my vocation as a poet. But otherwise, none.
( O O )
Louise was an important voice in AmLit way before her Nobel. Her understanding of the poetic process was very insightful.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/t...bcc5&esrc=MARTECH_ORDERFORM&mbid=CRMNYR012019
Writing as Transformation
Words and phrases came from nowhere; I rarely had any sense of what they meant or to what context they belonged.
By Louise Glück
January 4, 2025
It seems to me that I have wanted to write for the whole of my life. The intensity of this insistence, despite its implausibility, suggests an emotional, rather than literal, accuracy. I think my life didn’t seem my life until I started to write.
I came from a family of talkers. But talk, in my house, was not conversation. Talk was holding forth. Prevailing. Having the last word. Only one person could do it at a time, which meant that there was constant barging in and interruption, as impatience to speak grew more feverish and more relentless. Everybody wanted to talk. Nobody wanted to listen. In this, I was exactly like my mother and my father and my sister, though we had, each of us, a distinctive style.
More and more, the sentences I had in my head were like the sentences I loved in books: they began in one place and ended somewhere you hadn’t imagined them going, though, at each turn, idea seemed to follow idea perfectly naturally. The surprise at the end, as the thought completed itself, seemed wildly exciting: the whole sentence needed to be reëxperienced in this light; waves of unexpected revelations and insights resulted. Paradox. But an interrupted paradox is not simply edited—it is fundamentally changed, sometimes into the orderly, reasonable opposite it seemed destined to be. Because I never got to finish what I intended to say, a response (on the rare occasions when one was given) never seemed a response to my thought but, rather, to the simplified idea it had become.
I came to have a sense that the self I was in the world, among other selves, was alternately precarious and invisible. I did not think speech was a good conduit to the self, or expression of it, because in my childhood it was not. The page was different. Here my voice had a stability and an immutability, qualities that I passionately craved and never remotely approached in my social interactions. How could I? Stability and immutability are not characteristics of the spoken word.
And so on . . . I like stuff about people talking about how they create.
Louise was an important voice in AmLit way before her Nobel. Her understanding of the poetic process was very insightful.
Sometimes the why is as important as the how.
https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/why-i-write/
( O O )
You're not a psychologist, Serb. Shut up.Terminal delirium.
lolI am disabled thanks to an attack by Russian agents while working in the Balkans.
What threats, alice?You and Poo Poo Pee Pee, living in a world of fear, are snitch bitches too cowardly to act on your threats.
One doesn't need to be a psychologist to see you're a delusional gimp.You're not a psychologist, Serb. Shut up.
( O O )