What is a "fake" submissive?

I think I've become much more observant, accepting and open-minded when it comes to the tremendous variety of submissive personalities. I still run into examples of "submissives" that crack me up, and there is no shortage of them on this forum or in this thread.

That's neither her nor there, however, since I'm not dating anyone in this thread.

However, although most of the submissives I meet-- in whatever communication medium-- do not fall inside a matrix of traits that pairs well with my personal flavor of dominance, I do see a lot of similarities in 99% of people who identify as such. I'll be talking about that a lot more in my case study thread.

On a side note, there is something I find interesting.

The amount of competitiveness about how "true" one is to their role within the BDSM community is sometimes eyepopping. It was partially an exploration of this phenomenon that caused me to start the thread that inspired this one.

At almost any munch you go to, they will begin with everyone introducing themselves by name and orientation. There is always more dominant men and submissive women than any other category. Dominant women tend to introduce themselves as "tops" and submissive men tend to introduce themselves as "switches".

The older the Dominant, the more likely they are to tell you how long they have been in the lifestyle. There is always someone who says, "well, I'm very new, and I'm not really sure, but I think I'm submissive." As soon as she says this, all the Dominants start smiling like Cheshire cats and puffing their chests out. They will speak loudly about any topic to show their alpha status, and make vague implications that any Dominant but themselves is a fraud.

There is always one woman who identifies as a submissive, then tries to commandeer the entire discussion. She will belittle, interrupt and antagonize dominant men in particular. If anyone shows the slightest bit of displeasure at this behavior, she will begin lecturing everyone on how she's not going to kiss every Dom's ass just because she's a sub. The more coquette subs will nod in agreement when their Dom's roll their eyes at this character's boorishness, but in all actuality, this bitch is usually very popular among the subs.

There is always one person, usually heinously unattractive, who will appear to be submiting to everyone at once. More often than not this person is a female, but they may also be an older male. Everyone is "Sir" and "Ma'am" to this individual and he/she is constantly getting up to get people things they never asked for. This person usually expects a lot of compliments and attention and will get very cranky if they don't get it.

There is always one woman, who when it is her turn to tell her name and orientation, will look around the room, pause and say with special emphasis, "My name is Jane Doe, and I am a slave." She will correct anyone who refers to her as a submissive with some meaningless lecture as to the differences, which usually come at the expense of the other submissives ("you just like to submit, I need to submit, its who I am").

There is often a dominant male with a title four or five words long. He is perhaps a "Grand Dragon Master of the House of the Blue Flames." He may be wearing some unusual but somehow official looking attire, with bizarre symbols affixed in various places. Sometimes, he will smile and say proudly that as of last month he is now the "Exalted High Master of the Round Table of Perseus" and everyone will clap while the newbies try not to look too bewildered.

Finally, there is always a young male, attractive, articulate and well composed who is often accompanied by a gorgeous woman or two who appear to show him a tender deference, and he annoys everyone else with his unexpectedly sophisticated knowledge of BDSM acronyms, concepts and the like. At least at every munch I've been to. ;)
 
Marquis said:
There is often a dominant male with a title four or five words long. He is perhaps a "Grand Dragon Master of the House of the Blue Flames." He may be wearing some unusual but somehow official looking attire, with bizarre symbols affixed in various places. Sometimes, he will smile and say proudly that as of last month he is now the "Exalted High Master of the Round Table of Perseus" and everyone will clap while the newbies try not to look too bewildered.

I am smiling because I think I have met this person. LOL
 
Ebonyfire said:
I am smiling because I think I have met this person. LOL

I have met him in CA and KS, as well as the entire list of charters Marquis profiled.

*sigh*

maybe that is why I just gave up...
 
The trappings of dominance

I think sometimes many men and women are more concerned with how they look: the trappings of dominance. They get wrapped up in the superficial (cause it is easy) and do not do any homework. The fact of the matter is that being a good dominant is a lot of hard work, and many want to just look the part without being the part.

How much leather and chainmail does one need? I love leather, I love chainmail, but the lack of same has never stopped me from being successful as a dominant. It is how I behave that matters. I often think that my greatest asset is looking like a vanilla grandma type. The paradox of what I can do as a dominant versus what I look like I can do, is sometimes more effective than the tightest black leather or latex outfit.
 
The trappings of submission

Then you get the submissives who instantly tell you that they are slaves, but do not really know what slavery means. They think if means kneeling at your feet, and licking snatch nonstop.

"Beat me Mistress", they say, even though that seems a lot of work to Me. If a slave or submissive tells me he longs to beaten, chances are that is the last thing I will do. After all, who is dominating whom?

"I want to be your sex slave, Mistress". Hmm, now that is a tempting offer. Let's see, I have had that one at least 10 times in one week. It seems that the point of view is that we female dominants are sex starved, and of need of nonstop sexual gratification. NOT!

Now if the slave wants to do my laundry, Laudy, Laudy, I am getting the vapors just in anticipation. That gets me hotter than the "fuck me at your will" slave. Last time I checked all men have dicks, and so there is nothing new there.

Finding so called submissives for the trappings of submission is easy.

Eb
 
Last edited:
Marquis said:
I think I've become much more observant, accepting and open-minded when it comes to the tremendous variety of submissive personalities. I still run into examples of "submissives" that crack me up, and there is no shortage of them on this forum or in this thread.

That's neither her nor there, however, since I'm not dating anyone in this thread.

However, although most of the submissives I meet-- in whatever communication medium-- do not fall inside a matrix of traits that pairs well with my personal flavor of dominance, I do see a lot of similarities in 99% of people who identify as such. I'll be talking about that a lot more in my case study thread.

On a side note, there is something I find interesting.

The amount of competitiveness about how "true" one is to their role within the BDSM community is sometimes eyepopping. It was partially an exploration of this phenomenon that caused me to start the thread that inspired this one.

At almost any munch you go to, they will begin with everyone introducing themselves by name and orientation. There is always more dominant men and submissive women than any other category. Dominant women tend to introduce themselves as "tops" and submissive men tend to introduce themselves as "switches".

The older the Dominant, the more likely they are to tell you how long they have been in the lifestyle. There is always someone who says, "well, I'm very new, and I'm not really sure, but I think I'm submissive." As soon as she says this, all the Dominants start smiling like Cheshire cats and puffing their chests out. They will speak loudly about any topic to show their alpha status, and make vague implications that any Dominant but themselves is a fraud.

There is always one woman who identifies as a submissive, then tries to commandeer the entire discussion. She will belittle, interrupt and antagonize dominant men in particular. If anyone shows the slightest bit of displeasure at this behavior, she will begin lecturing everyone on how she's not going to kiss every Dom's ass just because she's a sub. The more coquette subs will nod in agreement when their Dom's roll their eyes at this character's boorishness, but in all actuality, this bitch is usually very popular among the subs.

There is always one person, usually heinously unattractive, who will appear to be submiting to everyone at once. More often than not this person is a female, but they may also be an older male. Everyone is "Sir" and "Ma'am" to this individual and he/she is constantly getting up to get people things they never asked for. This person usually expects a lot of compliments and attention and will get very cranky if they don't get it.

There is always one woman, who when it is her turn to tell her name and orientation, will look around the room, pause and say with special emphasis, "My name is Jane Doe, and I am a slave." She will correct anyone who refers to her as a submissive with some meaningless lecture as to the differences, which usually come at the expense of the other submissives ("you just like to submit, I need to submit, its who I am").

There is often a dominant male with a title four or five words long. He is perhaps a "Grand Dragon Master of the House of the Blue Flames." He may be wearing some unusual but somehow official looking attire, with bizarre symbols affixed in various places. Sometimes, he will smile and say proudly that as of last month he is now the "Exalted High Master of the Round Table of Perseus" and everyone will clap while the newbies try not to look too bewildered.

Finally, there is always a young male, attractive, articulate and well composed who is often accompanied by a gorgeous woman or two who appear to show him a tender deference, and he annoys everyone else with his unexpectedly sophisticated knowledge of BDSM acronyms, concepts and the like. At least at every munch I've been to. ;)

This is fucking hilarious but I haven't to my knowledge met any of these people.

I've also never been asked my orientation in a "round table" sort of way. At a munch we are usually in public so that doesn't happen. At demos and play parties, I sometimes get asked.

Fury :rose:
 
I wouldnt say fake but i do think there are many who really wanna be but just aren't.
Thats as far as i take my opinion on this matter because i'm really not in the mood to deal with a flamefest.
 
Marquis said:
Is he Jamaican?

Nope. He was a Dom in WA state where I used to live. When I read what you posted, it instantly reminded me of him.
 
Fake submissives? I could give you a list of the ones I've come across at collarme.com. I'd hate to tell you the numbers. You probably wouldn't believe me.

And, I think there are some out there looking for Mr. Perfect, and the chances of finding him are about 99.99 to 1 against. Anybody they get a message from is filtered through that Mr. Perfect filter. One thing wrong...delete!

It's sad but true. And the older I get, the more I see it. Sure, they have every right to be this way, but they are not only fooling themselves, they are also forcing an otherwise prospective match not to exist.

Hey, ladies! How about talking to Mr. Almost Perfect? He might be less than Mr. Perfect, but at least he exists.


And, don't get me started on the ones who make so many "or else" demands that you wonder if she's really a Domme?

OK, I feel better now. :D
 
Marquis said:
I think I've become much more observant, accepting and open-minded when it comes to the tremendous variety of submissive personalities. I still run into examples of "submissives" that crack me up, and there is no shortage of them on this forum or in this thread.

That's neither her nor there, however, since I'm not dating anyone in this thread.

However, although most of the submissives I meet-- in whatever communication medium-- do not fall inside a matrix of traits that pairs well with my personal flavor of dominance, I do see a lot of similarities in 99% of people who identify as such. I'll be talking about that a lot more in my case study thread.

On a side note, there is something I find interesting.

The amount of competitiveness about how "true" one is to their role within the BDSM community is sometimes eyepopping. It was partially an exploration of this phenomenon that caused me to start the thread that inspired this one.

At almost any munch you go to, they will begin with everyone introducing themselves by name and orientation. There is always more dominant men and submissive women than any other category. Dominant women tend to introduce themselves as "tops" and submissive men tend to introduce themselves as "switches".

The older the Dominant, the more likely they are to tell you how long they have been in the lifestyle. There is always someone who says, "well, I'm very new, and I'm not really sure, but I think I'm submissive." As soon as she says this, all the Dominants start smiling like Cheshire cats and puffing their chests out. They will speak loudly about any topic to show their alpha status, and make vague implications that any Dominant but themselves is a fraud.

There is always one woman who identifies as a submissive, then tries to commandeer the entire discussion. She will belittle, interrupt and antagonize dominant men in particular. If anyone shows the slightest bit of displeasure at this behavior, she will begin lecturing everyone on how she's not going to kiss every Dom's ass just because she's a sub. The more coquette subs will nod in agreement when their Dom's roll their eyes at this character's boorishness, but in all actuality, this bitch is usually very popular among the subs.

There is always one person, usually heinously unattractive, who will appear to be submiting to everyone at once. More often than not this person is a female, but they may also be an older male. Everyone is "Sir" and "Ma'am" to this individual and he/she is constantly getting up to get people things they never asked for. This person usually expects a lot of compliments and attention and will get very cranky if they don't get it.

There is always one woman, who when it is her turn to tell her name and orientation, will look around the room, pause and say with special emphasis, "My name is Jane Doe, and I am a slave." She will correct anyone who refers to her as a submissive with some meaningless lecture as to the differences, which usually come at the expense of the other submissives ("you just like to submit, I need to submit, its who I am").

There is often a dominant male with a title four or five words long. He is perhaps a "Grand Dragon Master of the House of the Blue Flames." He may be wearing some unusual but somehow official looking attire, with bizarre symbols affixed in various places. Sometimes, he will smile and say proudly that as of last month he is now the "Exalted High Master of the Round Table of Perseus" and everyone will clap while the newbies try not to look too bewildered.

Finally, there is always a young male, attractive, articulate and well composed who is often accompanied by a gorgeous woman or two who appear to show him a tender deference, and he annoys everyone else with his unexpectedly sophisticated knowledge of BDSM acronyms, concepts and the like. At least at every munch I've been to. ;)


LOL I've never been to a munch, but I've met all these characters here on lit. Well except that last one. :confused: ARe you sure he exists? :p
 
Evil_Geoff said:
"Fake" submissive, eh?

You MIGHT be dealing with a Fake Submissive when they are ...


...someone who tries, constantly, to "top from the bottom". That is to say, uses deceit, manipulation, emotional blackmail and other dishonest, inderect ways to try to direct their dominant partner into actions or directions the "submissive" desires. Being human we ALL do these things occassionally, it's the nature of the beast and to be expected once in a while, but a Fake Submissive will do it all the time.

... someone who always has excuses for not accomplishing assigned tasks, has a reason for every failed goal or objective, who promises much but delivers little or nothing in the way of service and obedience.

I could go on, but that should be enough to get some thoughts going...


These two points from EG explain my view of fake.

Some people come across as 'wannabes' not fakes.
For example they may declare they 'want' to do a number of things but come the time the excuses flow as fast as the safe words.

Sometimes it means their fantasises are not ready to be a reality sometimes they are they submissive version of a cock tease.

I tease and can make the odd quick comment but when he uses a particular tone of voice all attempts at topping cease. My attempts are so very obvious they are clearly not meant to be taken seriously. But I have had other Doms call me a fake because I spoke out.

I agree its important to have some knowledge of what you have as a hard/soft limit but some submissives come with a wheelbarrow full.
Its hard to gain any satisfaction for either person if the point is submission, but it ends up with the submissive as director.
It is bound to affect that mental need to submit if you are are always trying to manoevre the situation.

Personally I see elements of fake in SAMMy subs too.
Not necessarily those who claim to be SAMMY (like Gracie, up front and obvious, but she knows when its is right and when it is not); but those who are and do not say so or make a joke about it themselves.

I don't envy any PYL caught up in a situation with someone like that.
Its is a form of lies and deciet even if it is by ommission
 
Ebonyfire said:
Then you get the submissives who instantly tell you that they are slaves, but do not really know what slavery means. They think if means kneeling at your feet, and licking snatch nonstop.


Amen sister! Mention "I want you to mow the lawn, then trim the shrubs and rake everything up!" and *POOF* They're gone quicker than a Alt.com boot!
 
HI!

My name is Geoff, and I'm a Dominant.

It's been three weeks since my last beating...

What? This isn't a 12 Step Meeting???
 
Marquis said:
I think I've become much more observant, accepting and open-minded when it comes to the tremendous variety of submissive personalities. I still run into examples of "submissives" that crack me up, and there is no shortage of them on this forum or in this thread.

That's neither her nor there, however, since I'm not dating anyone in this thread.

However, although most of the submissives I meet-- in whatever communication medium-- do not fall inside a matrix of traits that pairs well with my personal flavor of dominance, I do see a lot of similarities in 99% of people who identify as such. I'll be talking about that a lot more in my case study thread.

On a side note, there is something I find interesting.

The amount of competitiveness about how "true" one is to their role within the BDSM community is sometimes eyepopping. It was partially an exploration of this phenomenon that caused me to start the thread that inspired this one.

At almost any munch you go to, they will begin with everyone introducing themselves by name and orientation. There is always more dominant men and submissive women than any other category. Dominant women tend to introduce themselves as "tops" and submissive men tend to introduce themselves as "switches".

The older the Dominant, the more likely they are to tell you how long they have been in the lifestyle. There is always someone who says, "well, I'm very new, and I'm not really sure, but I think I'm submissive." As soon as she says this, all the Dominants start smiling like Cheshire cats and puffing their chests out. They will speak loudly about any topic to show their alpha status, and make vague implications that any Dominant but themselves is a fraud.

There is always one woman who identifies as a submissive, then tries to commandeer the entire discussion. She will belittle, interrupt and antagonize dominant men in particular. If anyone shows the slightest bit of displeasure at this behavior, she will begin lecturing everyone on how she's not going to kiss every Dom's ass just because she's a sub. The more coquette subs will nod in agreement when their Dom's roll their eyes at this character's boorishness, but in all actuality, this bitch is usually very popular among the subs.

There is always one person, usually heinously unattractive, who will appear to be submiting to everyone at once. More often than not this person is a female, but they may also be an older male. Everyone is "Sir" and "Ma'am" to this individual and he/she is constantly getting up to get people things they never asked for. This person usually expects a lot of compliments and attention and will get very cranky if they don't get it.

There is always one woman, who when it is her turn to tell her name and orientation, will look around the room, pause and say with special emphasis, "My name is Jane Doe, and I am a slave." She will correct anyone who refers to her as a submissive with some meaningless lecture as to the differences, which usually come at the expense of the other submissives ("you just like to submit, I need to submit, its who I am").

There is often a dominant male with a title four or five words long. He is perhaps a "Grand Dragon Master of the House of the Blue Flames." He may be wearing some unusual but somehow official looking attire, with bizarre symbols affixed in various places. Sometimes, he will smile and say proudly that as of last month he is now the "Exalted High Master of the Round Table of Perseus" and everyone will clap while the newbies try not to look too bewildered.

Finally, there is always a young male, attractive, articulate and well composed who is often accompanied by a gorgeous woman or two who appear to show him a tender deference, and he annoys everyone else with his unexpectedly sophisticated knowledge of BDSM acronyms, concepts and the like. At least at every munch I've been to. ;)

LOL, now I am glad I have never been to munches or clubs or parties, and explains why he often tells me he will take me sometime just so I can see how much I won't really like it and why it isn't really our thing.

Catalina :catroar:
 
DVS said:
Fake submissives? I could give you a list of the ones I've come across at collarme.com. I'd hate to tell you the numbers. You probably wouldn't believe me.

And, I think there are some out there looking for Mr. Perfect, and the chances of finding him are about 99.99 to 1 against. Anybody they get a message from is filtered through that Mr. Perfect filter. One thing wrong...delete!

It's sad but true. And the older I get, the more I see it. Sure, they have every right to be this way, but they are not only fooling themselves, they are also forcing an otherwise prospective match not to exist.

Hey, ladies! How about talking to Mr. Almost Perfect? He might be less than Mr. Perfect, but at least he exists.


And, don't get me started on the ones who make so many "or else" demands that you wonder if she's really a Domme?

OK, I feel better now. :D

How did you figure out it was Me messin' with ya?
 
CutieMouse said:
These two disturb me greatly- the people who are so lonely or have such poor self image, that they will put themselves in positions they normally wouldn't- all for the sake of being in a relationship. It absolutely *sucks* being alone, but it sucks less, than being someone you aren't.


I am grateful that I have never had this experience. The men I talk to, are not desperate, they are just impatient, because they want what they want. Unfortunately for them I move to a different drummer.

I have my own calypso beat going.

Eb
 
I am feeling the need to apologies to Cutie (and that she is) for aggressively hijacking her most genuine thread. I have done nothing to contribute to the question at hand, I did have great fun at the expense of others.

That said, I have this to say about "fake" subs.... hmmmm

nope, nothing right now.

Time for more Sunday morning coffee. :kiss:
 
CutieMouse said:
You are a very goofy man.

No apologies necessary- even the occasional hijack bumps a thread up, sometimes inspiring others to contribute. :)

aaaa, your so sweet, and cute

and understanding....

I really do have some thoughts on the subject, just have not been able to string together a lucid comment..
 
Kajira Callista said:
I wouldnt say fake but i do think there are many who really wanna be but just aren't.
I agree with this statement, and find it very useful to ask the question - why?

Why would someone desperately want to be something they are not?

One answer might be that the BDSM "Community" has become positively Orwellian in many ways.

We reject the social hierarchy of perceived decency & fulfillment peaked by the model image of a church-going, heterosexual, monogamous, suburban, married couple practicing safe, clean, non-violent sex in the bedroom.

But what do we do next? We set up a new hierarchy in its place.

And now we have some Masters who look down on Doms, and Doms who look down on Tops. We have some slaves feeling smug about their perceived status over submissives, and submissives feeling smug about their self-professed superiority over bottoms.

At least the bottoms can console themselve by joining other self-satisfied members of "The Community" in mocking "vanilla people" as sexually incompetent and incommunicative.

:rolleyes:

A few rather obvious conclusions that can be drawn here are that people are people no matter what they do in the bedroom, Orwell is brilliant, and Animal Farm is pure genius.
 
How do you know you're submissive without trying? And how do you try if you have this romantic notion of a relationship, don't want to try without feelings, but don't want to involve someone who knows what they want in a relationship where you don't know if this has any potential of working? :confused:
Are you fake, or wannabe, or 'real' submissive, before you know for sure? If you say you don't know (yet), are you still fake?

This might not have much or anything to do with the topic of this thread, I don't really know. It's just the thoughts that crossed my mind while reading. I don't expect any answers, I'm not sure there really are some.

Ok, I guess I don't know what I'm saying at all. I might come back in the morning when I'm sober again and edit around.
 
Back
Top