And don't be fat or his fat ass will make fun of you as you faint.Kamala was right: Undecided voters should go to one of DonOld’s rallies. (Just make sure you have arranged for your own transportation after the rally.)
Which of his user names does he have on his Grindr profile? I'm guessing probably "HumpDayHoratio."
I busted this one earlier today.
That's because he didn't. He simply claimed after the fact to have done so, when the evidence shows otherwise.
Not in the way you're suggesting. For what feels like the nine millionth time, the Speaker of the House does not have any authority to call in the National Guard. It's that simple.
No, they did not. The worst you can point to is that Waters' comments could be construed in numerous ways.
In many cases, by right-wing counterprotesters like Kyle Rittenhouse.
Pro-protest, not pro-riot. The two are not even close to being the same thing.
I have no doubt that you couldn't.
Nope. From Biden on down, they condemned the violence.
This would be a lot more convincing if it weren't coming from someone who has repeatedly argued that Trump bears no responsibility for January 6 ("will be wild!"). What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
If that were true, you wouldn't give us so much material to work with.
https://cha.house.gov/2024/9/transc...keep-january-6-safe-were-deliberately-ignored
https://cha.house.gov/2024/6/nancy-...-own-narrative-of-january-6-hbo-footage-shows
https://www.factcheck.org/2021/04/in-her-own-words-maxine-waters/
Big heaping pile of bullshit!
Promoting confrontation is promoting violence. Promoting donations to a bail fund for those who commit crimes, violent behavior, is giving a green light to be violent knowing their behavior will be legally dismissed. Protest and violence co-existed. A lawmaker cannot support one without inadvertently supporting the other or being misconstrued as acceptable behavior. Words matter and so does timing.
When CNN tries to convince its viewers that the protests were peaceful while buildings in the background were burning is nothing more than propaganda, pushing misinformation, something you democrats accuse the right of doing.
Most politicians did condemn violence. This is you muddying the waters. I never said they didn’t.
If that were true, you wouldn't give us so much material to work with.
That's Loudermilk's interpretation, nothing more. And if you actually read your own link, you know his argument is nonsense - at best, Trump made an informal comment that no one else in the room thought was an official authorization.
"Said Charman Loudermilk". I don't know if the bolding is yours or not, but that should have made it rather hard to miss, either way.
It's a stretch to call her comments advocating for violence. And here as everywhere, it wouldn't kill you to give some thought to why so many Black Americans feel they have to push back that hard against police brutality.
"Will be wild!"
You’re a stretch! You wouldn’t say shit if you had a mouthful of it. When You lunes lose an argument you’re quick to change the subject back to Trump. TDS
Cite the narrative, the complete narrative!
Again cite the complete narrative. How many times have you dumbfucks taken bloodbath out of context implying that if Trump loses the election there would be violence in the streets. Charlottesville comments taken out of context implying that Trump supported extreme left and extreme right wing ideology. You fucking democrats lie! LIE! LIE!
Trump has a history, during his administration he worked with governors to deploy NG troops when needed, but they refused. Not once did he countermand the governors decisions. He never mobilized US military ( National Guard ) for domestic issues period. More fire! fire! hair on fire! bullshit
He was responding to Lit's lefty loony cynicism. Weak but appropriate.
You were given the narrative above. You were given the exact quotes. You said it was taken out of context. Now apparently you can provide no context except for the one that you make up.
Bring it, AJ.
*If necessary* implies that out of control criminal behavior exist. He, as president, is well within his authority to mobilize and federalize NG troops if a situation threatens our government or the safety of the American people.
He didn't do shit on j6, traitor.
I can't help it if you're misinformed. This event would never have happened had Pelosi and the Pentagon followed Trump's advise. As far as what happened on J/6 I'll wait for the court proceedings to clarify things. So far Smith's legal brief is a pile of inadmissible hear say bullshit. Pelosi's unconstitutional sham kangaroo committee lacked credibility starting with the composition of the committee and the absence of cross examination.
This event would not have happened had Trump peacefully turned over power to his legitimate successor and not promoted lies for months. The oath keepers specifically showed up to attack the Capitol and he knew this.
trump incited j6 and he could have stopped it. Quit blaming his failures on others. Pelosi didn't invite armed insurrectionists to storm the building.
