White women dominating black women : Race Play

[Samuelx]

*scratches his chin*

So race play is fine?

I didn't understand before, but someone who's been there and done that explained it to me. race play is okay, as long as both parties know what they're getting into. racism is never okay.

 

[PredatorSmile]

I didn't understand before, but someone who's been there and done that explained it to me. race play is okay, as long as both parties know what they're getting into. racism is never okay.

Hear hear.

 

[Primalex]

racism is never okay.

Do you eat animals?

If you do, you are a hypocrite. If it's okay to believe in the superiority of a species[^1], then it must be okay to believe in the superiority of a race.




[^1] species is not the correct biological classification, I've just used it for simplification.

 

[Samuelx]

Do you eat animals?

If you do, you are a hypocrite. If it's okay to believe in the superiority of a species[^1], then it must be okay to believe in the superiority of a race.




[^1] species is not the correct biological classification, I've just used it for simplification.

Well, I think we might a racist onboard. Hello, Hater.

 

[PredatorSmile]

Well, I think we might a racist onboard. Hello, Hater.

No kidding. exactly what I sought to avoid.

 

[Primalex]

Well, I think we might a racist onboard. Hello, Hater.

Impressive reasoning.


Just out of curiosity: Do you think racists can't have a valid opinion?

 

[nh23]

Well, I think we might a racist onboard. Hello, Hater.

I wouldn't assume that. I think he just likes to piss people off. It's not limited to race.

 

[RawHumor]

Why is it that 80% of your threads seem to have the words "black", "white", or "inter-racial" in the titles?

Whether you're for real or not, it makes you come across as someone who's trying to bait people.

 

[Luna_Wolf72]

Impressive reasoning.


Just out of curiosity: Do you think racists can't have a valid opinion?

I think racists can have (and give) a valid opinion on all sorts of things. The point to this thread though, was race play...in other words using BDSM as a way to deal with fears, needs, etc. concerning racial issues. Those two things (racism vs race play) are mutually exclusive and should not be swapped around as if they mean the same thing.

Why is it that 80% of your threads seem to have the words "black", "white", or "inter-racial" in the titles?

Whether you're for real or not, it makes you come across as someone who's trying to bait people.

Sam talks about inter-racial stuff alot because it interests him, just as it does me. *shrugs* I have been reading him on the GLBT forum forever.

 

[Primalex]

I think racists can have (and give) a valid opinion on all sorts of things. The point to this thread though, was race play...in other words using BDSM as a way to deal with fears, needs, etc. concerning racial issues.

Race play is a way to deal with fears, needs etc. concerning racial issues?
Age play is a way to deal with fears, needs etc. concerning father issues?
Nurse play is a way to deal with fears, needs etc. concerning hospital issues?

Oh, please.

 

[Samuelx]

I think racists can have (and give) a valid opinion on all sorts of things. The point to this thread though, was race play...in other words using BDSM as a way to deal with fears, needs, etc. concerning racial issues. Those two things (racism vs race play) are mutually exclusive and should not be swapped around as if they mean the same thing.



Sam talks about inter-racial stuff alot because it interests him, just as it does me. *shrugs* I have been reading him on the GLBT forum forever.

Well, I'm glad, Luna. I'm thinking of writing about race play and its issues in BDSM.

 

[OlderBiMan]

Why is it that 80% of your threads seem to have the words "black", "white", or "inter-racial" in the titles?

Whether you're for real or not, it makes you come across as someone who's trying to bait people.

To each his own. A saying that stands the test of time because it works.

 

[Samuelx]

To each his own. A saying that stands the test of time because it works.

Well said, sir.

 

[Primalex]

Well said, sir.

Do you eat animals now or not?

 

[Samuelx]

Do you eat animals now or not?

I've given some serious thought to eating racists. They taste wonderful with sodium and mayo.

Now where can I find some ?

 

[Primalex]

I've given some serious thought to eating racists. They taste wonderful with sodium and mayo.

Now where can I find some ?

No idea.

Do you eat animals or not?

 

[Netzach]

Do you eat animals?

If you do, you are a hypocrite. If it's okay to believe in the superiority of a species[^1], then it must be okay to believe in the superiority of a race.




[^1] species is not the correct biological classification, I've just used it for simplification.

I eat animals.

I see no hypocrisy. Animals aren't people. They don't have to get a fucking vote. This logic works if you're morally unable to distinguish between a rat and a person. Or if you're one of those moral geniuses who insists that a mouse is more important than their own son.

Genocidal maniacs of all kinds have worked the animal=person=certain people angle, often while being vegetarians and doggie lovers. Point?

 

[Primalex]

Animals aren't people.

And this difference is reason enough to kill them? Is it okay to eat an ape? Why? Why not?

This logic works if you're morally unable to distinguish between a rat and a person.

Distinguish on which level? You agree that rats are alive unlike plants, right? Rats are social and have a high intelligence. They dream. So is it all about the physical appearance that makes a rat not a person?

 

[Netzach]

And this difference is reason enough to kill them? Is it okay to eat an ape? Why? Why not?

This difference is enough to eat them. It's not enough to torture them needlesssly or kill them for amusement in sickening manners. It's enough difference to raise them with space and good feed and end their lives quickly and put 'em on a plate.

Re: Apes, dolphins, New Caledonian Crows - I don't have a problem with it if you need to eat one, and if there were more than five left. In spite of their remarkableness. However, all the above are rare to the point of eating them being more than just person eats animal. The people who are poaching these things are third world desperate. How'd that happen? Colonialism. Post colonialism. Racism and fuckery for centuries.

The fact that there are people meat-hunting them says more about distribution than apes or people. There's no reason anyone should feel they have to with as much food as there is in the world, and there's no reason it should be OK to eat things that are dying off. Our political indifference to one another and the same inequalities that I feel suck ass are the things that have fucked the great ape.

From a conservation perspective, of course not. There's like, five left.

Yes, rats are amazing. They also can be disease vectors which wipe out entire communities.

So are birds, and people eat them, me among them. And pee wee the parrot might be my companion, while carl the chicken is lunch. None of this has anything to do with human rights.

None of this has anything to do with homo sapiens, in which case your melanin has absolutely jack shit to do with what kind of rights and entitlements one should be *denied* by another color phase of the species. Even birds, with plenty of color phases, aren't that fucking stupid with each other.

 

[ammre]

"If it's okay to believe in the superiority of a species[^1], then it must be okay to believe in the superiority of a race."

false.

There are significantly less differences between races then their are between the people in certain races, let alone mammals of other orders and families.

 

[Primalex]

This difference is enough to eat them. It's not enough to torture them needlesssly or kill them for amusement in sickening manners. It's enough difference to raise them with space and good feed and end their lives quickly and put 'em on a plate.

What for? You grant them the right to not get tortured. Either they are sentient beings, then it's sick to kill them. Or they are not, then they don't mind if they are "tortured needlessly".

Yes, rats are amazing. They also can be disease vectors which wipe out entire communities.

So what? Humans manage this, too.

None of this has anything to do with human rights.

I disagree. That humans are not animals is a distinction that, how handy, the human made. The animal might view this completely different. Why do we have human rights? Because it's important to treat beings on two legs nicely? Or because we thought that a sentient being deserves a treatment that recognizes that it is a sentient being?

what kind of rights and entitlements one should be *denied* by another color phase of the species.

What about sentient aliens from outer space? Do they deserve human rights? Or should it be allowed to kill and torture them at will? Your distinction "human" and "not human" is so flawed on so many levels that I'm surprised you still try it as argument.

 

[Primalex]

"If it's okay to believe in the superiority of a species[^1], then it must be okay to believe in the superiority of a race."

false.

There are significantly less differences between races then their are between the people in certain races

So what? Because two cars are more similiar than a car and a truck I'm denied to believe that one car can be better than another car? How silly is this?

 

[Primalex]

Just a reminder, I'm looking for a response from Mr. Xavier, who is so much interested in racial discussions.

 

[Samuelx]

Just a reminder, I'm looking for a response from Mr. Xavier, who is so much interested in racial discussions.

Ah, what do we have here ? I think we have a roleplayer here. A woman pretending to be a twisted man for kicks ? Or the other way around ? Either way, you're not who you appear to be. Drop the mask. If you're a racist, you're a racist.


Things don't bode well for you.


Europeans are hit with the largest dose of infertility and the lowest birthrate among all humans on the planet Earth. Simply put, the imperialists have a dilemma. Their men are shooting blanks. Their women seem drier than the sahara.

I guess the time of the 'master race' is coming to an end.

In the United States of America, Hispanics, Blacks and Asians will soon outnumber whites....causing whites to become ( gasp !) minorities.

Imperialism is dead, most colonies of european powers, whether in north america, south america, or africa, have become independent.

former colonies such as China, Japan, Brazil and South Africa are now economic powerhouses while the old guard is crumbling.

If you're a racist who believes his or her alabaster skin makes them some kind of deity....you're in for a BIG dose of reality.

I think you're going extinct....not because of the actions of other humans but because Mother Nature is out to get you.

Maybe you've all pissed her off by enslaving and mistreating others for millennia.

Just a thought.

 

[MisterSir]

...what in God's name are you blathering on about?

I've noticed the same thing as some people before, the only times I ever see you post is in threads like this, where you're talking about race. I have nothing against people posting about things they have an interest in, but you seem to do nothing else, and with this latest river of idiocy I'm going to conclude you're one of those people who's genuinely racist against Caucasians. Jumping to a conclusion? Possibly, but prove me wrong.

By the way, your statement about former colonial economies lost its credibility when you cited Japan as an economic powerhouse because this is the country whose interest rate has wobbled around the 0.5% mark and whose government has in the recent past predicted growth rates of zero percent. Japan has problems.