BlackSnake
Anaconda
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Posts
- 9,196
Pure said:One conclusion is obvious. There's no rational, coherent and sensible way to formulate--regarding real or faked depictions of teens-- an 'underage' rule (at literotica) or law about obscenity (text), or even pornography (photos).
Indeed all codification of censorable materials or criteria for identifying them may be internally incoherent.
J.
Not to pick on you, but that sounded like this sales guy I called Mr. Acronym. He sounded like he knew what he was talking about but when I bet him that he could explain what a DBMS was he shut up. Rule number one of effective communication talk so that you are understood by your audience.
The person making the decision on what stories will be accepted don't have a clear understanding why they reject some stories over another. Is that what you were trying to get across?