A positive about Trump: he permanently damaged hypocritical American evangelicals.

In Internet slang, a troll (/troʊl, trɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting quarrels or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll's amusement.

Wikipedia

Good description of yourself, Annie. Well done. 10/10.
 
Good description of yourself, Annie. Well done. 10/10.

Says the guy wearing someone elses avatar. Jesus, George. You and your butt brother spent the entire day trolling me. Maybe you should take a breath while you still have a modicum of self respect. :)
 
Last edited:
He sure spends a lot of time posting about you for someone he finds so insignificant.

I outed him as a racist years ago (he quoted some right-fringe bullshit stats about African Americans). That's usually *the thing* which contributes to life-long obsessions among the deplorables here. :cool:

Cade was another example. Same thing.
 
I outed him as a racist years ago (he quoted some right-fringe bullshit stats about African Americans). That's usually *the thing* which contributes to life-long obsessions among the deplorables here. :cool:

Cade was another example. Same thing.

I've heard the name mentioned - Cade - but am not familiar. However they have shown some remarkable homogeneity so it's not like there'd be that much difference likely. ;)
 
I outed him as a racist years ago (he quoted some right-fringe bullshit stats about African Americans). That's usually *the thing* which contributes to life-long obsessions among the deplorables here. :cool:

Cade was another example. Same thing.

Cade? You're still fighting Cade? No one is after you Rory. No one cares about you Rory. You did feel that you are in such a bad position here you had to play the race card. How desperate you must be. :)
 
No. You're Ken. I know you have personality issues, but c'mon now even you should be able to keep this basic information straight.
 
I've heard the name mentioned - Cade - but am not familiar. However they have shown some remarkable homogeneity so it's not like there'd be that much difference likely. ;)

He's been gone for a long time. (I'm assuming meth, but that's really just a guess.) He was so desperate for my attention that he put my name in a half-dozen alts, posted about me on other forums (and linked to them), made a fake profile of me on Gay.com, the whole nine yards. It was quite a show.

Best thread was where he tried to prove how manly he was starting a thread about "pussy power" - with an image of a woman's asshole. :D
 
He's been gone for a long time. (I'm assuming meth, but that's really just a guess.) He was so desperate for my attention that he put my name in a half-dozen alts, posted about me on other forums (and linked to them), made a fake profile of me on Gay.com, the whole nine yards. It was quite a show.

Best thread was where he tried to prove how manly he was starting a thread about "pussy power" - with an image of a woman's asshole. :D

This may be an odd compliment, but I don't think even Ken/Bert is that stupid. At least I'd hope not.
 
This may be an odd compliment, but I don't think even Ken/Bert is that stupid. At least I'd hope not.

No, not that stupid.

But it's a very low bar. Cade behaved like he was borderline.
 
No, not that stupid.

But it's a very low bar. Cade behaved like he was borderline.

A very low bar indeed. Although Bert/Ken definitely has his borderline moments. Maybe not the same border, but a border nonetheless.
 
No. You're Ken. I know you have personality issues, but c'mon now even you should be able to keep this basic information straight.

So you know all about Ken, Bert and Cade's personality traits? You really are a fast learner , Simone. :)
 
Sure there is. I've read them.
No you haven't. you've read writings by people who claim to have talked to God.
Big difference.
Not to mention they were mostly transcribed by illiterates so there's no way to know how much semblance they have with the original texts.
 
phrodeau said:
There’s no such thing as “God’s law”.
Saint_Ann said:
Sure there is. I've read them.
No you haven't. you've read writings by people who claim to have talked to God.
Big difference.
Not to mention they were mostly transcribed by illiterates so there's no way to know how much semblance they have with the original texts.
Voices in the head can be very persuasive, as can mega-generations of scribes' typos and transcription errors, high-level editorial decisions, and torture.

[Current biblical texts used by many Xian sects were collated by the Imperial Wizards (church fathers) of the new established Roman State Religion. Those Wizards were mostly of Roman senatorial families. They omitted or edited texts that didn't support hierarchy and holy authority. Oy.]

Divine laws are written for (and by) those who make the most of them. BTW have y'all sold your daughters into slavery yet, or executed uppity kids? It's the law. And eating carrageen in foods will send you to Hell. Enjoy.
 
No you haven't. you've read writings by people who claim to have talked to God.
Big difference.
Not to mention they were mostly transcribed by illiterates so there's no way to know how much semblance they have with the original texts.

They are pretty good laws wouldn't you say?
 
Read Leviticus. Obey Leviticus. Thats the Law.

New Testament does it's best to put those aside. Some pretty good twisting to keep the anti-gay thing going and not the others but it wouldn't be religion without something to make everybody hate each other.
I think Paul took care of the food and clothing restrictions. I think it was Paul anyway. He did most of the talking in the NT.
 
New Testament does it's best to put those aside. Some pretty good twisting to keep the anti-gay thing going and not the others but it wouldn't be religion without something to make everybody hate each other.
I think Paul took care of the food and clothing restrictions. I think it was Paul anyway. He did most of the talking in the NT.
So Lord {JHWH}'s Torah laws don't apply? Because a Roman-Jewish torturer and death-squad leader who claimed divine channeling whilst knowing nothing of the godling he promoted (and never cited or quoted because ignorant) set up rules opposite of what his godling ordered? Right.

Yeshua supposedly said he was there to fulfill (obey) Torah, the Law, not overthrow it. He also supposedly (if he ever existed) told his followers to abandon their families and live communally. And rich people go to hell. Those not following his guidance can't really say they're of his faith. Feh.

Biblical texts are great. One can cherry-pick whatever excuses one wants.
 
Back
Top