AI A New Era 2023 - 11010101

[djrip]

Apparently, AI will replace porn stars too.

ai is the death of porn

For now, AI porn is kind of like animated porn - they can do some interesting things, but it doesn't look real. Eventually, it may be indistinguishable from real video. But it will always lack one thing - actresses (and actors I guess) who viewers wish they could bonk in real life, who viewers think about physically doing the things they are watching them do, and get off on the thought that they're seeing what this real person did, and how that person had to really do it, and really feel and taste everything they're seeing them experience.

I mean, unless they build out whole personnas for AI actors with AI photos and videos of them doing normal stuff and trick viewers into thinking they're real...

 

[alohadave]

For now, AI porn is kind of like animated porn - they can do some interesting things, but it doesn't look real. Eventually, it may be indistinguishable from real video. But it will always lack one thing - actresses (and actors I guess) who viewers wish they could bonk in real life, who viewers think about physically doing the things they are watching them do, and get off on the thought that they're seeing what this real person did, and how that person had to really do it, and really feel and taste everything they're seeing them experience.

I mean, unless they build out whole personnas for AI actors with AI photos and videos of them doing normal stuff and trick viewers into thinking they're real...

People get off to written erotica, and many characters are not well fleshed out. So other than being visually disturbing to look at, I don't think they'll necessarily have a problem with AI generated porn.

 

[djrip]

People get off to written erotica, and many characters are not well fleshed out. So other than being visually disturbing to look at, I don't think they'll necessarily have a problem with AI generated porn.

People like written erotica, but I am not worried that written erotica will replace or wipe out video porn. It's niche.

 

[alohadave]

People like written erotica, but I am not worried that written erotica will replace or wipe out video porn. It's niche.

What I'm saying is that you don't need to go heavy in creating backstory for the AI pornstars. Most of them IRL are just made up names with no background at all. All that matters is the performance.

 

[Seadog777]

What I'm saying is that you don't need to go heavy in creating backstory for the AI pornstars. Most of them IRL are just made up names with no background at all. All that matters is the performance.

Very true.

 

[djrip]

What I'm saying is that you don't need to go heavy in creating backstory for the AI pornstars. Most of them IRL are just made up names with no background at all. All that matters is the performance.

Of course you don't need to. They can be cartoon porn. People will watch that, just like they watch animated porn now. What I'm saying is that the only way for AI porn to capture the one thing real porn will always have over AI porn, which is real humans who the viewer can get off on thinking about how they are real humans who had to do these things in real life, would be to trick people into thinking the AI actors were real humans with additional non-porn footage, or instagram posts, or whatever.

It's not the background that matters, you're right. It's the idea that this is a living human being. Especially if we reach an era with AI porn is indistinguishable from real porn, I would think viewers would come to be more interested in seeking some kind of proof that an actor is human, and actors would be more engaged than they are now in having things like instagram accounts. Which they do often have now.

 

[bettiezyx]

 

[bettiezyx]

Germany considers following Italy in banning ChatGPT​

https://news.yahoo.com/germany-chat...nai-ai-artificial-intelligence-101058703.html

 

[Voboy]

Germany considers following Italy in banning ChatGPT​

https://news.yahoo.com/germany-chat...nai-ai-artificial-intelligence-101058703.html

It's a genie that won't return to its bottle, alas.

We're already doomed I think. I don't trust us to do anything as smart as limiting ourselves with this.

 

[Duleigh]

I remember watching Colossus: The Forbin Project on TV decades ago about a supercomputer that took over the world. My dad said it would never happen in his lifetime, and he was right. Unfortunately I had a feeling that I would see it happen.

 

[bettiezyx]

"Asimov is exploring [AI] in the robot stories in the ’40s and the ’50s. By the end of his robot sequence he is imagining world computers that run everything and are carefully managing humanity. Asimov always imagines them as nannies and nurses, that they’ll take care of us, like babysitters—like the best babysitters ever. But Mike [in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress] is a pal, and I think that that’s different. He’s so much more of a fully realized person, and that is new in science fiction at that time. And he’s a good guy. He’s not a rampaging robot. … Asimov shifts the tide, in the ’40s and ’50s, then you get a slew of good robots and AIs going up to about Mike. Then of course we get HAL, and then things start to go south again."

‘The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress’ Makes Lunar Rebellion Fun​

https://www.wired.com/2022/06/geeks-guide-robert-heinlein/winamp/

 

[bettiezyx]

Jumping topics a bit, somehow youtube's algorithm/AI flagged this video I made for my AI Era story to 18+. None of the clips from which it was comprised got flagged which is a bit of a mystery. Filed an appeal w/ youtube.

 

[bettiezyx]

Jumping topics a bit, somehow youtube's algorithm/AI flagged this video I made for my AI Era story to 18+. None of the clips from which it was comprised got flagged which is a bit of a mystery. Filed an appeal w/ youtube.

And they pulled the restriction saying it's okay. How interesting.

 

[bettiezyx]

I think we all agree that fact-checking should be in order on the output...(they aren't checking, are they)

'ChatGPT Started Doing My Job, but AI Can't Replace Me'​

https://www.newsweek.com/chatgpt-ai-job-writing-employment-1792463

 

[XerXesXu]

Among the other effects that will follow the AI takeover of our lives, one inevitable consequence will be that machines will replace the mediocre and unimaginative.

'If you can't do - teach.'

They'll fill the expanding need for teachers of 'creative prompt engineering' then become pillars of the great, literary mediocrity. You can already find early adapters on the internet. That's how evolution works.

Is there any reason you don't have copyright in your carefully engineered 1000 word prompt? If not, then what reason could 'they' have to refuse copyright in the product of your prompt? Make sure you keep screenshots when you play, they may become valuable.

 

[bettiezyx]

But we need truth. We're already awash in data, much of which is incorrect, inconclusive, myopic, or malevolent and distinguishing it from fact has been difficult for even those with the time to do the work. AI has not shown the capability of doing this either making "garbage in, garbage out" of its black box all the more sinister as people blindly use it. When I look at this article, I see a system that can only identify patterns in behavior, not the content.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-misinformation-fake-news

 

[bettiezyx]

I’m a Sex Worker. AI Porn Isn’t Taking My Job​

https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgp7zb/ai-porn-and-sex-work-liara-roux

 

[bettiezyx]

He went on to explain that while "falsely reported on a claim of sexual harassment that was never made against me on a trip that never occurred while I was on a faculty where I never taught," ChapGPT "relied on a cited [a Washington Post] article that was never written and quotes a statement that was never made by the newspaper."

Law professor falsely accused of sexual misconduct by ChatGPT​

https://thepostmillennial.com/law-professor-falsely-accused-of-sexual-misconduct-by-chatgpt

 

[bettiezyx]

 

[bettiezyx]

MIT CSAIL researchers discuss frontiers of generative AI​

Experts convene to peek under the hood of AI-generated code, language, and images as well as its capabilities, limitations, and future impact.

https://news.mit.edu/2023/mit-csail-researchers-discuss-frontiers-generative-ai-0412

 

[bettiezyx]

Scammers use AI to catfish men on Reddit, trick them into paying for nudes of an AI-generated woman​

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/worl...or-nudes-of-an-ai-generated-woman/ar-AA19O0Rz

 

[Duleigh]

And they pulled the restriction saying it's okay. How interesting.

Youtube us weird, but then the [Lit]bot flagged one of my stories for being pedo because I used a common euphemism for a close shave comparing the fellows cheek as smooth as the south end of a northbound baby. The only thing that came to mind in that video is how entertaining Red is and was that Bruce Willis' last good movie? (and at 00:51 in your video - is her panties stuck?)

 

[mollylonglegs2020]

'If you can't do - teach.'

They'll fill the expanding need for teachers of 'creative prompt engineering' then become pillars of the great, literary mediocrity. You can already find early adapters on the internet. That's how evolution works.

Is there any reason you don't have copyright in your carefully engineered 1000 word prompt? If not, then what reason could 'they' have to refuse copyright in the product of your prompt? Make sure you keep screenshots when you play, they may become valuable.

AI images don't come out of thin air. They are composed of other images, produced by other creators, who don't get recognition. Why should your prompt be protected when it's only ripping off (potentially) millions of real artists?

 

[XerXesXu]

AI images don't come out of thin air. They are composed of other images, produced by other creators, who don't get recognition. Why should your prompt be protected when it's only ripping off (potentially) millions of real artists?

You'll find a considered and comprehensive answer, by the US Copyright Office, to your question, here.

Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence

(for TLR = Fill out the form correctly.)

 

[mollylonglegs2020]

You'll find a considered and comprehensive answer, by the US Copyright Office, to your question, here.

Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence

(for TLR = Fill out the form correctly.)

I got from that:

No, your prompt cannot be protected, because it is in the nature of instruction to an artist and not the execution of the artwork.

That feels intuitively correct. They also talk about the output from generative AI bring further modified by a human artist, and works resulting from that being protected.

I thought it was an intelligent overview discussion of the issue. Thanks for linking it.