Andra_Jenny
Mentally Divergent
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2000
- Posts
- 2,865
lever!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Andra_Jenny said:
We did not conquer and occupy our enemies on a permanent basis. Lets' face it children the US has always been isolationist because we are so abohored with European operating principles. Yes we were drug into the wars because you had to drag America into wars but now you have us so conditioned as to beleive that we are neccessary to all your dirty little affairs because you have grown so pitifully weak and are still so arrogant. We look out at the rest of the world and see a fucking cesspool that keeps pointing a finger at us. Screw that!
Look at the stats you use to beat up on the U.S.
You are barbarians; you have the DEATH PENALTY!
Hey, no one imposed it, its called freedom. People of each state are free to vote about things and decide. Its a beautiful concept. If you do not like the death penalty you are free to do many things:
move,
argue against it,
protest,
organize voting blocks,
and many other things that you
CANNOT DO IN ALL THOSE BULLSHIT COUNTRIES WHO TRY TO BEAT UP ON US.
WE RULE!
Oliver Clozoff said:This thread had a lot of potential but it really degenerated into a lot of knee-jerk reactions from both the Americans and the globalists. I find it notable that in our global politically-correct culture that it's considered boorish and unenlightened to make sweeping generalizations about racial groups (e.g. "black people are like ____..." but it's still permissible to utter stereotypes about nationalities (e.g. Americans are egotistical, arrogant, and self-absorbed, etc.).
Not knee jerk reactions but considered opinions as formed by periods of observation, reading and experiencing events as they are happening at the moment. I haven't read any generalisations by serious debaters on this thread. Unless its in the form "because of such and such your country is like this just as ours was because of such and such".
ClosetDesire, your points are correct and well-reasoned, and you're obviously an educated and thoughtful person so you should be able to see that the Americans on this thread seem unfairly singled-out. You rightly point out the value of recognizing our common humanity, but you must recognize that the Americans are the only ones "on trial" here. Who else are you lecturing to? The more you assert to Americans "You NEED us!", the more apt Americans are to recoil at the idea and retreat into the idea that even if we need you, you're making us want you less and less.
I can't speak for Closet Desire but I have been wondering myself where the debaters on the other side of the house are. I've taken part in a number of these debates (I'm a European globalist to give me a generalised title) but the only opposition, apart from one or two posters who don't stay long after their one or two posts, to my views have been hysterical outpourings along the lines of Andra Jenny. In the end threads like this tend to run out of steam not because of any final conclusions being reached or even an agreement to disagree, but because there is only one side still here with the same or close viewpoint.
What happens next is the American nationalists like Andra Jenny retreat more and more into their nationalist positions, which of course just reinforces the globalists' idea that Americans really ARE arrogant and self-absorbed. Predictable expressions of exasperated disbelief promptly follow from the globalists, and the cycle continues on and on...
I think we can distinguish between Andra Jenny and a poster who is speaking with knowledge, experience or study. There is no need for anyone to worry that the way she puts her points make us feel that Americans are "arrogant and self-absorbed". Yes I personally feel exhasperated at her attitude but I've come across enough people like her in the past for it not to influence me.
America has done just fine to this point, being isolationist and building a world economic empire (rather than a political one) by turns. America has obviously been doing something right.
I think you'll find that the Bretton Woods Agreement was designed to give America both economic and political power. Economic in the shape of the World Bank and the IMF and political in the shape of the United Nations. But it wasn't being isolationist that brought about the Agreement, it was America's desire to seek economic superiority. The Marshall Plan is another example of that policy.
Maybe it IS in all of our best interests to get fully on board to this global community idea and eschew a lot of our modern conveniences, but Americans definitely aren't sold on the idea yet....Should we be so quick to wager our prosperity? As industrious and sensible as we have proven to be, it will obviously take a lot more to convince us of all this than just the easy rhetoric of all peoples' common humanity and the need for international cooperation.
I agree with you that it is going to be an uphill struggle to convince America that the way forward is to put on one side parochial and nationalist feelings, but the Trading Block/Agreement you have formed with Mexico and Canada indicates that you at least recognise you will need partners in the future. If only to combat the ever growing economic strength of Europe.
If, however, we ever are fully convinced of this idea, it will truly be revolutionary because America has shown time and again that it can achieve anything its people unite behind.
Yes but to quote the song "Times They Are A-Changing".
A very quick conclusion. It is imperative that the USA re-thinks its political attitude and recognises the fact that the world is changing very rapidly. At the moment Europe's star is in the ascendancy. I don't think it's any secret that we are vying for position as economic top dog for this and maybe next century. To enhance our position we will, over the next few years, absorb the new East European States into the European Union, states which have already applied to join. Not for any economic advantage but for the markets that will be opened to us once they become part of the Union.
Personally I feel it's crazy for America not to participate in this new change. Your expertise, knowledge, innovation and above all drive is needed. The lack of enthusiasm by your current government and the constant talk about isolationism make the rest of us feel frustrated but certainly not anti.
Oliver Clozoff said:
It's just so damned predictable and tired. You're obviously right CD, but your approach is wrong. It should be obvious what the results will be of chastising the citizens of a country that has gone from being a colonial backwater at the far corner of the world to the world's lone superpower in the space of than 250 years. America has done just fine to this point, being isolationist and building a world economic empire (rather than a political one) by turns. America has obviously been doing something right.
EvilBollWeevil said:
Well, me, the UN, Michael Moore. I'd say I'm in alright company.
